Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14248/JKOSSE.2019.15.2.047

A Study on the Application of MOEs, MOPs, TPMs for the Integrated Logistics Support  

Seo, Yang Woo (ILS R&D Lab, LIG Nex1)
Oh, Young Il (ILS R&D Lab, LIG Nex1)
Park, Eun Shim (ILS R&D Lab, LIG Nex1)
Lim, Seong Jun (ILS R&D Lab, LIG Nex1)
Lee, Seung Sang (ILS R&D Lab, LIG Nex1)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society of Systems Engineering / v.15, no.2, 2019 , pp. 47-56 More about this Journal
Abstract
Although the weapon systems are becoming more diverse and complex, they are progressing in a short development period and a longer test and evaluation period. The more difficult the given environment is, the more efforts and performance of quantitative target values can be made by development agencies to carry out stable projects. However, these target values of the Integrated Logistics Support are not specified in the requirements and being set during the system development phase. In this paper, application of MOEs, MOPs and TPMs for ILS are presented and provided the basis for carrying out systematic Verification & Validation activities. As a result that MOEs of the ILS were chosen as Availability and MOPs as Mission Reliability, Logistics Reliability, Maintainability and Supportability and TPMs as MTBF, MTBCF, MTTR and so on. In particular, it is appropriate tailoring and apply the TPMs considering the cost, schedule, scope of work and characteristics of the project.
Keywords
Measures of Effectives; Measures of Performances; Technical Performance Measures; Key Performance Parameters; Integrated Logistics Support;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Garry J. Roedler, Lockheed Martin Cheryl Jones, US Army, Technical Measurement, A Collaborative Project of PSM, INCOSE and Industry, Technical Measurement, p7, 9-11, 18, 26, 29, 36, 51-53, 2005.
2 Elizabeth Hull, Ken Jackson, Jeremy Dick, Requirements Engineering, 3rd Edition, Springer, p3, 2010.
3 The Influence of Reliability, Maintainability, Quality, Supportability and Interoperability on System Affordability, Reliability Information Analysis Center, p39-40, 2013.
4 Eric C. Honour, Systems Engineering Return on Investment, University of South Australia, p2, 2013.
5 Integrated Logistics Support Development Guide, dapa, p17, 2015.
6 DAG Guidebook, Defense Acquisition University, p144, 2004.
7 Benjamin S. Blanchard, Logistics Engineering and Management, 6th Edition, PEARSON, p23, 41-42, 2004.
8 Benjamin S. Blanchard, System Engineering and Analysis, 5th Edition, PEARSON, p56, 2011.
9 Defense Acquisition Program Administration Summary, dapa, P169, 2008.
10 Department of the Army Pamphlet 700-56, Logistics Supportability Planning & Procedures in Army Acquisition, p55-69, 2006.
11 MIL-HDBK-338B, Electrical Reliability Design Handbook, Section 6: Reliability Specification, Allocation, Modeling & Prediction, Department of Defense, p20, 1998.
12 MIL-STD-785B, Reliability Program for System & Equipment Development & Production, Task 201: Reliability Modeling, Department of Defense, p1, 1980.
13 DoD Guide for Achieving, Reliability, Availability and Maintainability, Chapter 3: Understand and Document User Needs and Constraints, Department of Defense, p7, 2005.
14 Defense Acquisition Program Administration Regulation, Defense Acquisition Program Administration, p133-135, 2018.