Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.46670/JSST.2021.30.5.290

Robust architecture search using network adaptation  

Rana, Amrita (Department of Electronic Engineering, Daegu Universtiy)
Kim, Kyung Ki (Department of Electronic Engineering, Daegu Universtiy)
Publication Information
Journal of Sensor Science and Technology / v.30, no.5, 2021 , pp. 290-294 More about this Journal
Abstract
Experts have designed popular and successful model architectures, which, however, were not the optimal option for different scenarios. Despite the remarkable performances achieved by deep neural networks, manually designed networks for classification tasks are the backbone of object detection. One major challenge is the ImageNet pre-training of the search space representation; moreover, the searched network incurs huge computational cost. Therefore, to overcome the obstacle of the pre-training process, we introduce a network adaptation technique using a pre-trained backbone model tested on ImageNet. The adaptation method can efficiently adapt the manually designed network on ImageNet to the new object-detection task. Neural architecture search (NAS) is adopted to adapt the architecture of the network. The adaptation is conducted on the MobileNetV2 network. The proposed NAS is tested using SSDLite detector. The results demonstrate increased performance compared to existing network architecture in terms of search cost, total number of adder arithmetics (Madds), and mean Average Precision(mAP). The total computational cost of the proposed NAS is much less than that of the State Of The Art (SOTA) NAS method.
Keywords
Neural architecture search; Deep neural networks; Search space; Parameter remapping; Detection;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 T. Elsken, J. H. Metzen, and F. Hutter, "Neural architecture search: A survey", J. Mach. Learn. Res., Vol. 20, No.1, pp. 1-21, 2019.
2 B. Zoph and Q. V. Le, "Neural architecture search with reinforcement learning", Proc. of Int. Conf. on Learn. Representations, pp. 1611.01578(1)-1611.01578(16), Toulon, France, 2017.
3 B. Zoph, V. Vasudevan, J. Shlens, and Q. V. Le. "Learning transferable architectures for scalable image recognition", Proc. of IEEE Conf. on Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit., pp. 8697-8710, Salt Lake City, Utah, 2018.
4 E. Real, A. Aggarwal, Y. Huang, and Q. V. Le. "Regularized evolution for image classifier architecture search", Proc. of AAAI Conf. on artif. intel., Hawaii, United States, pp. 4780-4789, 2019.
5 G. Huang, Z. Liu, L. V. D. Maaten, and K. Q. Weinberger, "Densely connected convolutional networks", Proc. of IEEE Conf. on Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit., pp.4700-4708, Honolulu, Hawaii, 2017.
6 Y. Chen, T. Yang, X. Zhang, G. Meng, X. Xiao, and J. Sun, "DetNAS: Backbone search for object detection", Proc. of Adv. Neural. Inf. Process. Syst., pp. 6642-6652, Montreal, Canada, 2019.
7 J. Deng, W. Dong, R. Socher, L. J. Li, K. Li, and F. F. Li, "Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database", Proc. IEEE Conf. on Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit., pp. 248-255, Miami, Florida, 2009.
8 T. Lin, M. Maire, S. J. Belongie, L. Bourdev, R. Girshick, J. Hays, P. Perona, D. Ramanan, C. L. Zitnick, and P. Dollar, "Microsoft coco: Common objects in context", Proc. of Comput. Vis. ECCV, pp. 740-755, Zurich, Switzerland, 2014.
9 R. J. Wang, X. Li, and C. X. Ling, "Pelee: A real-time object detection system on mobile devices", Proc. of Adv. Neural. Inf. Process. Syst., pp. 184.06882(1)-184.06882(10), Montreal, Canada, 2018.
10 W. Liu, D. Anguelov, D. Erhan, C. Szegedy, S. Reed, C. Y. Fu, and A. C. Berg, "SSD: Single shot multibox detector", Proc. of Comput. Vis. ECCV, pp. 21-37, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2016.
11 H. Pham, M. Y. Guan, B. Zoph, Q. V. Le, and J. Dean, "Efficient neural architecture search via parameter sharing", Proc. of Int. Conf. on Mach. Learn., pp. 4095-4104, Stockholm, Sweden, 2018.
12 H. Liu, K. Simonyan, and Y. Yang, "DARTS: Differentiable architecture search", Proc. of Int. Conf. on Learn. Representations, pp. 1806.09055(1)-1806.09055(13), New Orleans, United States, 2019.
13 Z. Li, C. Peng, G. Yu, X. Zhang, Y. Deng, and J. Sun, "Detnet: Design backbone for object detection", Proc. of Comput. Vis. ECCV, pp. 334-350, Munich, Germany, 2018.
14 M. Sandler, A. Howard, M. Zhu, A. Zhmoginov, and L. C. Chen, "MobilenetV2: Inverted residuals and linear bottlenecks", Proc. of IEEE Conf. on Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit., pp. 4510-4520, Salt Lake City, Utah, 2018.