Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14702/JPEE.2021.061

A Study on the Perceptions of Evaluation Fairness: Focusing on the Case of K University  

Yoon, Gwan-Sik (Department of Human Resource Development, KOREATCH)
Park, Min-Ju (Tecno-HRD Graduate Shool, KOREATCH)
Publication Information
Journal of Practical Engineering Education / v.13, no.1, 2021 , pp. 61-72 More about this Journal
Abstract
The educational field is also changing according to the change to the fourth industry. This is a new teaching method, and as performance evaluation is widely used, interest in the fairness of evaluation is also increasing. Students are interested in whether they are being evaluated fairly and examine the methods and processes of evaluation, which affects their confidence in evaluation. Accordingly, in this study, the evaluation fairness of K University students was classified into distribution fairness, procedural fairness, and interaction fairness, and examined through interviews. From the results, measures such as factors that hinder the fairness of evaluation and efforts to improve were derived.
Keywords
Distribution fairness; Evaluation fairness; Interaction fairness; Performance evaluation; Procedural fairness;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 K. S. Jeong, "The free semester policy and improving teaching and learning in Middle School," Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 399-421, 2013.
2 T. R. Tyler, "The psychology of procedural justice: a test of the group-value model," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 830-838, November 1989.   DOI
3 S. J. Kim and H. K. Kang, "Problem based learning evaluation and evaluation agents-focused on tutor, peer and self evaluation," Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society, vol. 14, no. 8, pp. 3732-3738, August 2013.   DOI
4 J. S. Seol and I. A. Kang, "An activity theoretical analysis on elementary school teachers' practice of constructivist education," Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 353-382, 2013.
5 J. H. Brown and R. J. Shavelson, "Assessing hands-on science: A teachers' guide to performance assessment," CA: Sage Publication Company, 1996.
6 R. Cropanzano and J. Greenberg, "Progress in organizational justice: Tunneling through the maze," International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, vol. 12, pp. 317-372, January 1997.   DOI
7 K. H. Kim, "Psychometric approaches of the validity verifications in performance assessments," Ewha Womans University doctor's Thesis, 2000.
8 H. G. Jeong, "Study on the examination of element hampering performance assessment and on the method of activating performance assessment," Yonsei University Master's Thesis, 2000.
9 C. Oberg, "Guiding classroom instruction through performance assessment," Journal of Case Studies in Accreditation and Assessment, vol. 1, pp. 1-11, September 2010.
10 J. J. Mintze, J. H. Wandersee, and J. D. Novak, "Teaching science for understanding: A human constructivist view," Cambridge, MA: Academic Press, 1998.
11 M. H. Min and J. R. Park, "Research on the assessment of physical and psychomotor domain in physical education at high school," School Sports Research Institute, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 313-341, 2009.
12 E. Shohamy, "Assessment in multicultural societies: Applying democratic principles and practices to language testing," in B. Norton and K. Toohey eds., Critical pedagogies and language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 72-92, 2004.
13 R. Driver and B. Bell, "Students' thinking and the learning of science: A constructivist view," School Science Review, vol. 67, no. 240, pp. 443-456, March 1986.
14 G. Kulm and S. M. Malcolm, "Science assessment in the service of reform," American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, D.C., 1991.
15 W. M. Roth, "Experimenting in a constructivist high school physics laboratory," Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 197-223, February 1994.   DOI
16 R. M. Chory, "Enhancing student perceptions of fairness: The relationship between instructor credibility and classroom justice," Communication Education, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 89-105, January 2007.   DOI
17 M. Deutsch, Distributive Justice: A Social-Psychological Perspective, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1985.
18 S. M. Horan, R. M. Chory, and A. K. Goodboy, "Understanding students'classroom justice experiences and responses," Communication Education, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 453-474, October 2010.   DOI
19 R. M. Chory-Assad, "Classroom justice: Perceptions of fairness as a predictor of student motivation, learning, and aggression," Communication Quarterly, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 58-77, January 2002.   DOI
20 R. J. Bies and J. S. Moag, "Interactional communication criteria of fairness," Research on Negotiation in Organizations, vol. 1, pp. 43-55, 1986.
21 K. H. Koh, C. Tan, and P. T. Ng, "Creating thinking schools through authentic assessment: The case in Singapore," Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 135-149, May 2012.   DOI
22 S. U. Choi and S. W. Choi, "The impact of justice perception on academic burnout for instructor's assessment of academic performance," Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 1-20, March 2019.
23 S. K. Baek, Theory and Practice of Performance Evaluation, Seoul: Wonmisa, 1998.
24 K. I. Han and K. H. Han, "Awareness, current status and support request of special education teachers on curriculum reconstruction and performance assessment of students," Journal of Educational Innovation Research, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 271-295, 2019.   DOI
25 H. J. Kim, "Gender differences in university students' perceptions on competency-based performance assessment," Asia-pacific Journal of Multimedia Services Convergent with Art, Humanities, and Sociology, vol. 50, no. 11, pp. 131-140, 2019.