Factors affecting Crop Damage by the Wild Boar (Sus scrofa) : A case study in Geochang County, Gyeongnam Province, Korea |
Lee, Seong-Min
(Daejeon Sejong Research Institute)
Lee, Eun-Jae (Daejeon Sejong Research Institute) Park, Hee-Bok (National Institute of Ecology) Seo, Chang-Wan (National Institute of Ecology) |
1 | Schlageter, A. and D. Haag-Wackernagel(2012) Evaluation of an odor repellent for protecting crops from wild boar damage. Journal of Pest Science 86(2): 209-215. |
2 | Schley, L., D. Dufrene, A. Krier, A.C. Frantz(2008) Patterns of crop damage by wild boar (Sus scrofa) in Luxembourg over a 10-year period. European Journal of Wildlife Research 54: 589-599. DOI |
3 | Schley, L. and T.J. Roper(2003) Diet of wild boar Sus scrofa in Western Europe, with particular reference to consumption of agricultural crops. Mammal Review 33(1): 43-56. DOI |
4 | Thapa, S.(2010) Effectiveness of crop protection methods against wildlife damage: A case study of two village at Bardia National Park, Nepal. Crop Protection 29: 1297-1304. DOI |
5 | Honda, T. and M. Sugita(2007) Environmental factors affecting damage by wild boars (Sus scrofa) to rice fields in Yamanashi Prefecture, central Japan. Mammals Study 32(4): 173-176. DOI |
6 | Honda, T., Y. Miyagawa, H. Ueda and M. Inoue(2009) Effectiveness of newly-designed electric fences in reducing crop damage by medium and large mammals. Mammals Study34(1): 13-17. DOI |
7 | Hone, J.(2007) Wildlife Damage Control, CSIRO Publishing, Victoria 179pp. |
8 | Mazzoni della Stella, R., F. Calovi, and L. Burrini(1995) The wild boar management in a province of the central Italy. Journal of Mountain Ecology 3: 213-216. |
9 | Hone, J. and B. Atkinson(1983) Evaluation of fencing to control feral pig movement. Australian Wildlife Research 10: 499-505. DOI |
10 | Lee, S.M. and W.S. Lee(2014) Diet of The Wild boar (Sus scrofa) in Agricultural Land of Geochang, Gyeonam Province, Korea. Journal of Korea Forest Society 103(2): 307-312. (in Korean with English abstract) DOI |
11 | McIlroy, J.C.(1995) New techniques for an old problem-recent advances in feral pig control in Australia. Journal of Mountain Ecology3: 241-244. |
12 | Ministry of Environment(MoE).(2014) Habitat Use Characteristics and Development of Damage Prevention Technique in Wild Boar (Sus scrofa), Sejong, Korea, 229pp. (in Korean with English abstract) |
13 | Naughton-Treves, L.(1998) Predicting patterns of crop damage by wildlife around Kibale national park, Uganda. Conservation Biology 12: 156-168. DOI |
14 | Honda, T.(2005) Evaluation of simple fences in preventing wild boar(Sus scrofa) damage to agricultural crops: Verification from factor "installation and maintenance". Wildlife Conservation Japan 9: 93-102. |
15 | Reidy, M.M., T.A. Campbell and D.G. Hewitt(2008) Evaluation of electric fencing to inhibit feral pig movements. The Journal of Wildlife Management 72(4): 1012-1018. DOI |
16 | Geisser, H. and H.U. Reyer(2004) Efficacy of hunting, feeding, and fencing to reduce crop damage by wild boars. Journal of Wildlife Management 68: 939-946. DOI |
17 | Amichi, A., F.Serrani, C.M. Rossi and R. Primi(2012) Increase in crop damage caused by wild boar (Sus scrofa L.): the "refuge effect". Agronomy for sustainable development 32(3): 683-692. DOI |
18 | Bleier, N., R. Lehoczki, D. Ujvary, L. Szemethy and S. Csanyi (2012) Relationships between wild ungulates density and crop damage in Hungary. Acta Theriologica 57: 351-359. DOI |
19 | Cai, J., Z. Jiang, Y. Zeng, C. Li and B.D. Bravery(2008) Factors affecting crop damage by wild boar and methods of mitigation in a gian panda reserve. European Journal of Wildlife Research 54: 723-728. DOI |
20 | Conover, M.(2002) Resolving Human-Wildlife Conflicts: The Science of Wildlife Damage Management. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, 418pp. |
21 | Geochang County.(2012) Statical year book of Geochang. Geochang, 473pp. (in Korean) |
22 | Herrero, J., A. Garcia-Serrano, S. Couto, VM. Ortuno, and R. Garcia-Gonzalez(2006) Diet of wild boar Sus scrofa L. and crop damage in an intensive agroecosystem. European Journal of Wildlife Research 52: 245-250. DOI |