1 |
Lee, S.W., J.H. Lim, M.S. Won and J.M. Lee(2009) Linking Spatial Characteristics of Forest Structure and Burn Severity. J. Korean Env. Res. Tech. 12(5): 28-41. (in Korean with English abstract)
|
2 |
Lyang, D.Y. and K.S. Lee(2010) Responses of an herbaceous community to wild boar(Sus scrofa coreanus Heude) disturbance in a Quercus mongolica forest at Mt. Jeombong, Korea. Journal of Ecology and field biology 33(3): 205-216.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
3 |
Mohr, D. and W. Topp(2001) Forest soil degradation in slopes of the low mountain range of Central Europe - do deer matter? Forstw. Cbl. 120: 220-230.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
4 |
Mohr, D., L.W. Cohnstaedt and W. Tropp(2005) Wild boar and red deer affect soil nutrients and soil biota in steep oak stands of the Eifel. Soil Biol. Biochem. 37: 693-700.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
5 |
Moody, A. and J.A. Jones(2000) Soil response to canopy position and feral pig disturbance beneath Quercus agrifolia on Santa Cruz Island, California. Appl. Soil Ecol. 14: 267-281.
|
6 |
Oh, K.C., J.K. Kim, W.O. Jung and J.K. Min(2001) The Changes of Forest Vegetation and Soil Environmental after Forest Fire. J. Korean Env. Res. & Reveg. Tech. 4(3): 19-29. (in Korean with English abstract)
|
7 |
Pinna, W., G. Nieddu, G. Moniello and M.G. Cappai(2007) Vegetable and animal food sorts found in the gastric content of Sardinian wild boar(Sus scrofa meridionalis). Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 91: 252-255.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
8 |
Rai, B. and A.K. Srivastava(1983) Decomposition and competitive colonization litter by fungi. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 15: 115-117.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
9 |
Risch, A.C., S. Wirthner, M.D. Busse, D.S. Page-Dumroese and M. Schutz(2010) Grubbing by wild boars(Sus scrofa L.) and its impact on hardwood forest soil carbon dioxide emissions in Switzerland. Oecologia 164: 773-784.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
10 |
Ritter, E.(2007) Nitrate in soil solution and nitrogen availability in litter and soil after gap formation in the semi-natural Suserup Skov and two managed beech Fagus sylvatica forest in Denmark. Ecol. Bull. 52: 103-111.
|
11 |
Robertson, G.P., M.A. Huston, F.C. Evans and J.M. Tiedje(1988) Spatial variability in a successional plant community: Patterns of nitrogen availability. Ecology 69: 1,517-1,524.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
12 |
Ryan, M.G. and B.E. Law(2005) Interpreting, measuring and modelling soil respiration. Biogeochemistry 73: 3-27.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
13 |
Schinner, F., R. Ohlinger, E. Kandeler and R. Margesin(1996) Methods in Soil Biology. Springer, Berlin, pp. 190-198.
|
14 |
Sinsabaugh, R.L. and S. Findlay(1995) Microbial Production, Enzyme Activity, and Carbon Turnover in Surface Sediments of the Hudson River Estuary. Microb. Ecol. 30: 127-141.
|
15 |
Sierra, C.(2001) The feral pig(Sus scrofa, Suidae) in Cocos Island, Costa Rica: rootings, soil alterations and erosion. Rev. Biol. Trop. 49: 1,159-1,170.
|
16 |
Singer, F.J., W.T. Swank and E.E.C. Clebsh(1984) Effects of wild pig rooting in a deciduous forest. J. Wildl. Mannage 48: 464-473.
DOI
|
17 |
Sinsabaugh, R.L. and A.E. Linkins(1993) Statistical modelling of litter decomposition from integrated cellulase activity. Ecology 74: 1,594-1,597.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
18 |
Sinsabaugh, R.L., R.K. Antibus, A.E. Linkins, L. Rayburn, D. Repert and T. Weiland(1992) Wood decomposition over a first-order watershed: mass loss as a function of exoenzyme activity. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 24: 743-749.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
19 |
Smith, S.M. and J.M. Tiedje(1979) Phases of denitrification following oxygen depletion in soil. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 11: 261-267.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
20 |
Speir, T.W.(1977) Studies on a climosequence of soils in tussock grasslands. 11. Urease, phosphatase, and sulphatase activities of top soils and their relationship with other properties including plant available sulphur. New Zeal. J. Sci. 20: 159-166.
|
21 |
Tabatabai, M.A.(1977) Effect of trace elements on urease activity in soils. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 2: 9-13.
|
22 |
Tardiff, S.E. and J.A. Stanford(1998) Grizzly bear digging: effects on subalpine meadow plants in relation to mineral nitrogen availability. Ecology 79: 2,219-2,228.
|
23 |
Cushman, J.H., T.A. Tierney and J.M. Hinds(2004) Variable eVects of feral pig disturbances on native and exotic plants in a California grassland. Ecol. Appl. 14: 1,746-1,756.
|
24 |
Tierney, T.A, and J. H. Cushman(2006) Temporal changes in native and exotic vegetation and soil characteristics following disturbances by feral pigs in a California grassland. Biological Invasions 8: 1,073-1,089.
DOI
|
25 |
Anderson, J.P.E. and K.H. Domsch(1978) A physiological method for the quantitative measurement of microbial biomass in soils. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 10: 215-221.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
26 |
Bardgett, R.D. and D.A. Wardle(2003) Herbivore mediated linkages between aboveground and belowground communities. Ecology 84: 2,258-2,268.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
27 |
Dalal, R.C.(1975) Urease activity in some Trinidad soils. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 7: 5-8.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
28 |
Dendooven, L. and J. M. Anderson(1994) Dynamics of reduction enzymes involved in the denitrification process in pasture soil. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 26: 1,501-1,506.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
29 |
Dick, R.P. and M.A. Tabatabai(1992) Potential uses of soil enzymes. In: Metting, Jr., F.B.(Ed.), Soil Microbial Ecology: Applications in Agricultural and Environmental Management. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp. 95-127.
|
30 |
Dick, R.P.(1994) Soil enzyme activities as indicators of soil quality. In: Doran, J.W., Coleman, D.C., Bezdicek, D.F., Stewart, B.A.(Eds.), Defining Soil Quality for a Sustainable Environment. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp. 107-124.
|
31 |
Eivazi, F. and M.A. Tabatabai(1988) Glucosidases and agalactosidases in soils. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 20: 601-606.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
32 |
Groot Bruinderink, G.W.T.A. and E. Hazebroek(1996) Wild boar(Sus scrofa scrofa L.) rooting and forest regeneration on podzolic soils in the Netherlands. For. Ecol. Manag. 88: 71-80.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
33 |
Frankenberger, W.T. and W.A. Dick(1983) Relationship between enzyme activities and microbial growth and activity indices in soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J., 47: 945-951.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
34 |
Gabet, E.J., O.J. Reichmann and E.W. Seabloom(2003) The effect of bioturbation on soil processes and sediment transport. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet Sci. 31: 249-273.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
35 |
Genov, P.(1981) Food composition of wild boar in north-eastern and western Poland. Acta Theriol 26: 185-205.
|
36 |
Ineson, A.(1977) Splash erosion, animal activity and sediment supply in a small forested Luxemburg catchment. Earth Surf. Process & Landf. 2: 153-160.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
37 |
Jefferies, R.L., D.R. Klein and G.R. Shaver(1994) Vertebrate herbivores and northen plant communities: reciprocal influences and processes. Oikos 71: 193-206.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
38 |
Knowles, R.(1982) Denitrification. Microbiological Reviews. 46: 43-70.
|
39 |
Koch, A.S. and E. Matzner(1993) Heterogeneity of soil and soil solution chemistry under Norway spruce(Picea abies Karst.) and Euroupean beech(Fagus silvatica L.) as influenced by disturbance from the stem basis. Plant and Soil 151: 227-237.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
40 |
Kotanen, P.M.(1995) Responses of vegetation to changing regime of disturbance: effects of feral pigs in a Californian coastal prairie. Ecography 18: 190-199.
DOI
|
41 |
Trangmar, B.B., R.S. Yost, M.K. Wade, G. Uehara and M. Sudjadi(1987) Spatial variation of soil properties and rice yield on recently cleared land. Soil Science Society of American Journal 51: 668-674.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
42 |
Kumar, Jha D., G.D. Sharma and R.R. Mishra(1992) Soil microbial population numbers and enzymes activities in relation to altitude and forest degradation. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 24: 761-767 .
DOI
ScienceOn
|
43 |
Lacki, M.J. and R.A. Lancia(1986) Effects of wild pigs on beech growth in Great Smoky Mountains National Park. J. Wildl. Mannage. 50: 655-659.
DOI
|
44 |
Ladd, J.N. and J.H.A. Butler(1972) Short-term assays of soil proteolytic enzyme activities using proteins and peptide derivatives as substrates. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 4: 19-30.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
45 |
Van der Wal, R., S. Sjorgertsen, S.J. Wooding, E.J. Cooper, I.S. Jonsdottir, D. Kuipers and T.A.D Fox, A.D. Huiskes(2007) Spring feeding by pinkfooted geese reduces carbon stock and sink strength in tundra ecosystems. Glob. Chang. Biol. 13: 539-545.
DOI
ScienceOn
|