Browse > Article

Characteristics of Musim Stream by Surveyed Sites Based on EPT-group of Aquatic Insects1a  

Shin, Hyun-Seon (Limnological Laboratory, University of Shiga Prefecture)
Mitamura, Osamu (Limnological Laboratory, University of Shiga Prefecture)
Kim, Sook-Jung (Dept. of Health Administration, Kyungbuk College)
Choi, Jun-Kil (Dept. of Biological Science, Sangji Univ.)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology / v.22, no.4, 2008 , pp. 420-426 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study compared and analyzed EPT ratio, EPT richness and EPT number(number of species and individuals) of a total of 9 selected sites individually using EPT-group of aquatic insects in Musim stream, also compared similarity ratio between the sampling sites using UPGMA(Unweighted Paired Group Method using Arithmetic average) based on analysis subsequent to species structure of aquatic insects, and compared and analyzed a functional feeding groups(FFGs) of aquatic insects based on stream order. As a result, the aquatic insect group of 2,269 individuals is classified as 71 species, 36 families, and 8 orders, and EPT ratio and EPT richness at sites 3(0.72 and 3.89, respectively) were found to be relatively higher than those at the other sites; by contrast, those at site 9(0.03 and 0.09, respectively) were relatively low. EPT number of species and individuals was found to be lowest at site 9. As a result of UPGMA analysis, the sampling sites in Musim stream were divided into three groups, including A1(site 1, 7, 8), A2(site 2, 3, 4, 5, 6) and B(site 9). According to the results of FFGs, there was not shown specific difference in the number of functional feeding groups by each sites; however, there appeared a little more shredders and scrappers in the upper and mid stream comparing to other sampling sites while collector-filterers and collector-gatherers were found to be dominant in number in the lower stream. According to this research result, the sampling sites in Musim stream were found to have an effect on not only EPT richness, EPT ratio, and EPT number but also FFGs structure.
Keywords
EPT RICHNESS; EPT RATIO; UPGMA; FUNCTIONAL FEEDING GROUPS;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 배연재, 원두희, 황득휘, 진영헌, 황정미(2003) 경기도 가평천의 하순에 따른 수서곤충 군집조성과 섭식기능군. 한국육수학회지36(1): 21-28
2 윤일병(1988) 한국동식물도감 제 30권 동물편(수서곤충류). 문교부, 서울, 840
3 윤일병, 공동수, 유재근(1992b) 저서성 대형무척추동물에 의한 생물학적 수질평가 연구 (III). 한국환경생물학회지 25: 177-183
4 환경백서(1997) 제3장 수환경보전 . 환경부행정간행물. 380000-67030-06-51. pp 315-360
5 Davis, S.D., S.W. Golladay, G. Vellidis and C.M. Pringle(2003) Macroinvertebrate biomonitoring in intermittent coastal plain stream impacted by animal agriculture. J. Environ. Qual. 32: 1036-1043   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Cummins, K.W.(1962) An evaluation of some techniques for the collection and analysis of benthic samples with special emphasis on lotic water. Am. Midl. Nat. 67: 477-504   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Klemm, D.J., P.A. Lewis, F. Fulk and J.M. Lazorchak(1990) Macroinvertebrate field and laboratory methods for evaluating the biological integrity of surface waters. EPA. Cincinnati Oh, USA
8 위인선, 나철호(1991) 수질환경오염에 대한 수서곤충 지표종에 관한 연구. 한국환경생물학회지 1: 42-54
9 Hellawell, J.M.(1986) Biological indicators of fresh water pollution and environmental management. Elsevier. London, 546
10 곽인실, 송미영, 전태수(2004) 저서성 대형무척추동물의 자연적 교란에 대한 영향. 한국육수학회지 37(1): 87-95
11 윤일병, 공동수, 유재근(1992a) 저서성 대형무척추동물에 의한 생물학적 수질평가 연구 (II). 한국환경생물학회지 10: 77-84
12 Coimbra, C.N., M.A.S Graca and R.M. Cortes(1996) The effects of a basic effluent on macroinvertebrate community structure in a temporary Mediterranean river. Environmental Pollution 94(3): 301-307   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Pennak, R.W. (1989) Fresh water invertebrates of the United States (3rd cd.). John Wiley & Sons. New York, 628
14 Kawai, T.(1985) An illustrated book of aquatic insets of Japan. Tokai University
15 Cummins, K.W. and M.J. Klug(1979) Feeding ecology of stream invertebrates. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 10: 147-172   DOI
16 배연재, 이병훈(2001) 한국 하천생태계의 환경훼손과 담수절지동물의 생물다양성 피해 및 보전. 한국곤충학회지 31(2): 63-76
17 Jaccard, P.(1908) Nouvelles recherches sur la distribution florale. Bul. Soc. Vaudoise Sci. Nat. 44: 223-270
18 Rutherford, D.A., A.A. Echelle and O.E. Maughan(1987) Changes in the fauna of the little river drainage, south-eastern Oklahoma, 1948-1955 to 1981-1982: Test of the hypothesis of environmental degradation. Community and evolutionary ecology of north American stream fishes. Univ. of Oklahoma. pp. 178-183
19 Hynes, H.B.N. and M.J. Coleman(1968) A simple method of assessing the annual production of stram benthos. Limnol. Oceanogr. 13: 569-573   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Merritt, R.W. and K.W. Cummins(1996) An introduction to the aquatic insects of North America. 3rd. Kendall/Hunt. Dubuque, Iowa
21 Resh, V.H. and G. Grodhaus(1983) Aquatic insects in urban environments. pp. 247-276 In Urban Entomology: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. G.W. Frankie and C.S.Koehler, editors. Praeger Publishers. New York
22 Allan, J.D.(1995) Stream Ecology. Structure and Function of Running Waters. Chapman & Hall, Landon
23 Rosenberg, D.M. and V.H. Resh(1993) Freshwater Biomonitoring and Benthic Macroinvertebrates. Chapman & Hall (Eds.). London
24 윤일병(1995) 수서곤충검색도설. 정행사, 서울, 7-218쪽
25 Peitz, D.G.(2003) Macroinvertebrate monitoring as an indicator of water quality: Status report for pipestone Creek, Pipestone National Monument, 1989-2002. 1-13