Browse > Article

Cross-cultural Comparison of Landscape Preference for the National Park: An Approach from a Typicality of Landscape  

Lee, Duk-Jae (Ecology Research Center, Dongguk University)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology / v.20, no.4, 2006 , pp. 482-492 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study has a purpose of examining the relationship between visual preference and typicality of natural landscapes in view of cross-cultural comparison. Both the photographs of the Cairngorms National Park of Scotland and those of the Jirisan National Park of Korea were used for selecting typical landscape of each National Park. To measure landscape preferences, a photo-questionnaire was implemented to the visitors of each National Park. Results showed that there was a significant relationship between age and number of visits and that Cairngorms visitors had visited the Park more frequently. The high typicality of Cairngorms landscape was negatively related to visual preferences. On the other hand, in case of Jirisan visitors, the high typicality of Jirlsan landscape was positively related to visual preferences. Although there was a significant relationship between typicality and visual preference, the way in which they were related differed between the separate cultural regions.
Keywords
BRITISH NATIONAL PARK; CAIRNGORMS; JIRISAN; FRIEDMAN TEST;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Association of National Park Authorities(2005) [online] URL. http://www.anpa.gov.uk/
2 Hekkert, P. and van Wieringen, P.C.W.(1990) Complexity and prototypicality as determinants of the appraisal of cubist paintings. British Journal of Psychology 81: 483-495   DOI
3 Herzog, T.R., Herbert, E.J., Kaplan, R., and Crooks, C.L.(2000) Cultural and developmental comparisons of landscape perceptions and preferences. Environment and Behavior 32(3): 323-346   DOI
4 Langlois, J .R. and Roggman, L.A.(1990) Attractive faces are only average. Psychological Sciences 1: 115-121   DOI
5 Loken, B. and Ward, J.(1990) Alternative Approaches to Understanding the Determinants of Typicality. Journal of Consumer Research 17: 111-126   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Lynch, K.(1960) Image of the City. Cambridge, MIT Press, 202pp
7 Murray, W.H.(1962) Highland Landscape. Aberdeen: National Trust for Scotland. 80pp
8 Yu, K.(1995) Cultural variations in landscape preference: comparisons among Chinese sub-groups and western design experts. Landscape and Urban Planning 32: 107-126   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Murphy, G.L. and Ross, B.H.(2005) The two faces oftypicality in category-based Induction. Cognition 95: 175-200   DOI   ScienceOn
10 권태호와 이준우(2003) 백두대간 마루금 등산로 및 주변 환경의 훼손실태: 만복대-복성이재 구간을 대상으로. 한국 환경생태학회지 16(4): 465-474
11 Gold, J.R. and Gold, M.M.(1995) Imagining Scotland: tradition, representation, and promotion in Scottish tourism since 1750. Aldershot, Hants, England, Scolar Press, 228pp
12 Martindale,C., Moore, K., and West, A.(1988) Relationship of preference judgments to typicality, novelty, and mere exposure. Empirical Studies of the Arts 6(1): 79-96   DOI
13 Peron, E., Purcell, A.T., Staats, H.J., Falchero, S. and Lamb, R.J.(1998) Models of preference for outdoor scenes: Some experimental evidence. Environment and Behavior 30: 282-305   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Ross R.T.(1974) Optimal orders in the method of paired comparisons. In Maranell, G.M. (ed), Scaling: A Sourcebook for Behavioral Scientists. Chicago, Aldine Publishing Company, 106-109pp
15 IUCN.(1994) Guidelines for protected areas management categories. Cambridge, UK, Gland, Switzerland: IUCN. 261pp
16 Bowring, J.(2002) Reading the Phone Book: cultural landscape myths in public art. Landscape Research 27(4): 343-358   DOI
17 Mandler, G.(1975) Mind and Emotion. New York, John Wiley, 296pp
18 하혜숙(1994) 지리산 지역의 이상향에 대한 연구. 경상대학교 석사학위논문, 52pp
19 Ateljevic, I. and Doorne, S.(2002) Representing New Zealand: Tourism Imagery and Ideology. Annals of Tourism Research 29(3): 648-667   DOI   ScienceOn
20 오구균과 이정은(2003) 백두대간의 식물상, 식생, 이용 및 환경훼손에관한학술자료: 지리산천왕봉부터 덕유산 향적봉 사이를 중심으로. 한국환경생태학회지 16(4): 475-486
21 Burnett, C.R., Medin, L.D., Ross, D.N. and Blok, S.V.(2005) Ideal is Typical. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 59(1): 3-10   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Siegel, S.N. and Castellan, J.(1988) Nonparametric statistics for the behavioural sciences(2nd ed.). New York, McGraw-Hill, 399pp
23 김세천(1988) 지리산국립공원의 경관관리에 관한기초연구(1) 경관자원을 중심으로. 전북대학교 농대논문집 19: 71-89
24 Posner, M.I.(1986) Empirical studies of prototypes. In Craig, C. (ed.), Noun Classes and Categorization. John Benjamins Philadelphia, 53-61pp
25 Barsalou, L.W.(1985) Ideals, Central Tendency, and Frequency of Instantiation as Determinants of Graded Structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 11: 629-654   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Andrews, M.(1989) The Search for the Picturesque: Landscape aesthetics and Tourism in Britain 1760-1800. Aldershot: Scolar Press, 287pp
27 Hekkert, P., Snelders, H.M.J.J. and van Wieringen, P.C.W.(2003) Most advanced, yet acceptable: Typicality and novelty as joint predictors of aesthetic preference. British Journal of Psychology 94: 111-124   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Rosch, E.H.(1973) On the internal structure of perceptual and semantic cetegories. In Moore, T.E.(Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language. New York, Academic Press, 111-144pp
29 Barsalou, L.W.(1991) Deriving categories to achieve goals. In Bower, G.H.(Ed.), The psychology oflearning and motivation: Advances in research and theory. San Diego, CA, Academic Press. 462pp
30 Jang, M., Cho, G., Song, H., Byeon, H., Kim, H., Joo, G.(2003) Fish Distribution and Water Quality of Mountain Streams in the Jirisan National Park, Korea. Korean Journal of Ecology 26(6): 297-305   DOI