Browse > Article

Estimation of Biomass of Pinus densiflora Stands Burnt Out by the 2005 Yangyang Forest Fire  

Lee Byung-Doo (Dept. of Forest Resources, Seoul National Univ.)
Chang Kwang-Min (Dept. of Forest Resources, Seoul National Univ.)
Chung Joo-Sang (Dept. of Forest Resources, Seoul National Univ.)
Lee Myung-Bo (Korea Forest Research Institute)
Lee Si-Young (Kangwon National Univ.)
Kim Hyung-Ho (Korea Forest Research Institute)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology / v.20, no.2, 2006 , pp. 267-273 More about this Journal
Abstract
The biomass of Pinus densiflora stands burnt out by the 2005 Yangyang forest fire was estimated based on the grades of fire severity; light, moderate and heavy. In order to measure the post-fire ground biomass in kg/ha, the ground fuels including shrub layer were collected and weighted and the crown biomass was estimated using allometric regressions and leaf area index for dry weight of P. densiflora. The pre-fire biomass was assumed to be equal to that of non-damaged P. densiflora stands having the same characteristics. The results indicated that the forest fire burnt out fuels of stands; 3,693 kg/ha in the light-damaged, 8,724 kg/ha in the moderately-damaged, and 17,451 kg/ha in the heavily-damaged forest stands.
Keywords
FIRE SEVERITY; FUEL; LEAF AREA INDEX;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 이병두(2005) GIS와 RS를 이용한 2000년 삼척산불 행동 특성 분석 및 산불확산예측모델 개발. 서울대학교박사학위 논문, 117쪽
2 Allison, E.C., Z.F. Peter and E.C. Joseph(2005) Comparison of burn severity assessments using Differenced Normalized Burn Ratio and ground data. International Journal of Wildland Fire 14: 189-198   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Haugaasen, T., J. Barlow and C.A. Peres(2003) Surface wildfires in central Amazonia: Short-term impact on forest structure and carbon loss. Forest Ecology and Management 179: 321-331   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Holden, Z.A., A.M.S. Smith, P. Morgan, M.G. Rollins and P.E. Gessler(2005) Evaluation of novel thermally enhanced spectral indices for mapping fire perimeters and comparisons with fire atlas data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 26(21): 4801-4808   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Key, C.H. and N.C. Benson(2004) Landscape assessment: ground measure of severity, the Composite Burn Index; and remote sensing of severity, the Normalized Burn Ratio. In 'FIREMON: Fire Effects Monitoring and Inventory System'. USDA Forest Services, Rocky MountainsResearch Station General Technical Report
6 Sah, J.P., M.S. Ross, S. Koptur and J.R. Snyder(2004) Estimating aboveground biomass of broad leaved woody plants in the understory of Florida Keys pine forests. Forest Ecology and management 230: 319-329
7 Sunar, F. and C. Ozkan(2001) Forest fire analysis with remote sensing data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 22(12): 2265-2277   DOI
8 Van Wagtendonk, J.W., R.R. Root and C.H. Key(2004) Comparison of AVIRIS and Landsat ETM+ detection capabilities for burn severity. Remote Sensing of Environment 92: 397-408   DOI   ScienceOn
9 White, J.D., K.C. Ryan, C.C. Key and S.W. Running(1996) Remote sensing of forest fire severity and vegetation recovery. International Journal of Remote Sensing 6: 125-136
10 정주상, 이병두, 김형호(2002) GIS 및 판별분석에 의한 삼척 산불지역의 소나무임분 피해도 추정. 한국임학회지 91(3): 355-361
11 이병두, 이시영, 정주상(2005) 2005년 강원도 양양산불 행동 특성. 한국화재.소방학회 논문지 19(4): 6
12 Chafer, C.J., M. Noonan and E. Macnaught(2004) The post-fire measurement of fire severity and intensity in the Christmas 2001 Sydney wildfires. International Journal of Wildland Fire 13: 227-240   DOI   ScienceOn
13 김형호, 이병두, 정주상(2002) 인공신경망 적용에 의한 Landsat 7 ETM+ 영상해독과 소나무림의 산불피해등급 추정. 한국임학회지 91(6): 706-713
14 원강영, 임정호(2001) 단일 시기의 Landsat 7 ETM+ 영상을 이용한 산불피해지도 작성. 한국원격탐사학회지 17(1): 85-97
15 Isave, A.S., G.N. Korovin, S.A. Bartalev and D.V. Ershov(2002) Using remote sensing to assess russian forest fire carbon emissions. Climatic change 55: 235-249   DOI   ScienceOn
16 박인협, 김준선(1989) 한국산 4개 지역형 소나무천연림의 물질 현존량 추정식에 관한 연구. 한국임학회지 78(3): 323-330
17 Bartelink, H.H.(1996) Allometric relationships on biomass and needle area of Douglas-fir. Forest Ecology and Management 86: 193-203   DOI   ScienceOn