Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5668/JEHS.2018.44.6.524

Size Distributions of Particulate Matter Emitted during 3D Printing and Estimates of Inhalation Exposure  

Park, Jihoon (Institute of Health and Environment, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University)
Jeon, Haejoon (Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University)
Park, Kyungho (The Center of Green Complex Technologies, Korea Conformity Laboratories)
Yoon, Chungsik (Institute of Health and Environment, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University)
Publication Information
Journal of Environmental Health Sciences / v.44, no.6, 2018 , pp. 524-538 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to identify the size distributions of particulate matter emitted during 3D printing according to operational conditions and estimate particle inhalation exposure doses at each respiratory region. Methods: Four types of printing filaments were selected: acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS), polylactic acid (PLA), Laywood, and nylon. A fused deposition modeling (FDM) 3D printer was used for printing. Airborne particles between 10 nm and $10{\mu}m$ were measured before, during, and after printing using real-time monitors under extruder temperatures from 215 to $290^{\circ}C$. Inhalation exposures, including inhaled and deposited doses at the respiratory regions, were estimated using a mathematical model. Results: Nanoparticles dominated among the particles emitted during printing, and more particles were emitted with higher temperatures for all materials. Under all temperature conditions, the Laywood emitted the highest particle concentration, followed by ABS, PLA, and nylon. The particle concentration peaked for the initial 10 to 20 minutes after starting operations and gradually decreased with elapsed time. Nanoparticles accounted for a large proportion of the total inhaled particles in terms of number, and about a half of the inhaled nanoparticles were estimated to be deposited in the alveolar region. In the case of the mass of inhaled and deposited dose, particles between 0.1 and $1.0{\mu}m$ made up a large proportion. Conclusion: The number of consumers using 3D printers is expected to expand, but hazardous emissions such as thermal byproducts from 3D printing are still unclear. Further studies should be conducted and appropriate control strategies considered in order to minimize human exposure.
Keywords
3D printing; filament; extruder temperature; ultrafine particles; inhalation exposure;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Cheves S. A pilot study to evaluate VOCs outgassed in polymer filaments used in 3D printing. 2014: 1-26.
2 Cimino D, Rollo G, Zanetti M, Bracco P. 3d printing technologies: are their materials safe for conservation treatments? IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2018. IOP Publishing, 012029.
3 Lithner D, Larsson Å, Dave G. Environmental and health hazard ranking and assessment of plastic polymers based on chemical composition. Sci Total Environ. 2011; 409(18): 3309-3324.   DOI
4 Stabile L, Scungio M, Buonanno G, Arpino F, Ficco G. Airborne particle emission of a commercial 3D printer: The effect of filament material and printing temperature. Indoor Air. 2017; 27(2): 398-408.   DOI
5 Azimi P, Zhao D, Pouzet C, Crain NE , Stephens B. Emissions of ultrafine particles and volatile organic compounds from commercially available desktop three-dimensional printers with multiple filaments. Environ Sci Technol. 2016; 50(3): 1260-1268.   DOI
6 Kim Y, Yoon C, Ham S, Park J, Kim S, Kwon O, et al. Emissions of nanoparticles and gaseous material from 3D printer operation. Environ Sci Technol. 2015; 49(20): 12044-12053.   DOI
7 Kwon O, Yoon C, Ham S, Park J, Lee J, Yoo D, et al. Characterization and control of nanoparticle emission during 3D printing. Environ Sci Technol. 2017; 51(18): 10357-10368.   DOI
8 International Commission on Radiological Protection. Human Respiratory Tract Model for Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 66. 1994; 24: 1-3.
9 Wojtyla S, Klama P, Baran T. Is 3D printing safe? Analysis of the thermal treatment of thermoplastics: ABS, PLA, PET, and nylon. J Occup Env Hyg. 2017; 14(6): D80-D85.   DOI
10 Choi C. Characteristics of particle emissions according to parameter setting. Dissertation of Graduate School of Hanyang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 2016
11 Stefaniak AB, LeBouf RF, Yi J, Ham J, Nurkewicz T, Schwegler-Berry DE, et al. Characterization of chemical contaminants generated by a desktop fused deposition modeling 3-dimensional Printer. J Occup Env Hyg. 2017; 14(7): 540-550.   DOI
12 Steinle P. Characterization of emissions from a desktop 3D printer and indoor air measurements in office settings. J Occup Env Hyg. 2016; 13(2): 121-132.   DOI
13 Yi J, LeBouf RF, Duling MG, Nurkiewicz T, Chen BT, Schwegler-Berry D, et al. Emission of particulate matter from a desktop three-dimensional (3D) printer. J Toxic Env Health Part A. 2016; 79(11): 453-465.   DOI
14 Afshar-Mohajer N, Wu CY, Ladun T, Rajon DA, Huang Y. Characterization of particulate matters and total VOC emissions from a binder jetting 3D printer. Build Environ. 2015; 93: 293-301.   DOI
15 Du Preez S, Johnson A, LeBouf RF, Linde SJ, Stefaniak AB, Du Plessis J. Exposures during industrial 3-D printing and post-processing tasks. Rapid Prototyping J. 2018;1-8.
16 Ryan T, Hubbard D. 3-D printing hazards: Literature review & preliminary hazard assessment. Prof Saf. 2016; 61(6): 56-62.
17 Stephens B, Azimi P, El Orch Z, Ramos T. Ultrafine particle emissions from desktop 3D printers. Atmos Environ. 2013; 79: 334-339.   DOI
18 Yang Y, Li L. Total volatile organic compound emission evaluation and control for stereolithography additive manufacturing process. J Clean Prod. 2018; 170: 1268-1278.   DOI
19 Deng Y, Cao SJ, Chen A, Guo Y. The impact of manufacturing parameters on submicron particle emissions from a desktop 3D printer in the perspective of emission reduction. Build Environ. 2016; 104: 311-319.   DOI
20 Zhou Y, Kong X, Chen A, Cao S. Investigation of ultrafine particle emissions of desktop 3D printers in the clean room. Procedia Engineer. 2015; 121: 506-512.   DOI
21 Mansour OY. Thermal degradation of some thermoplastic polymers in presence of lignin. Polym-Plast Technol. 1992; 31(9-10): 747-758.   DOI
22 Rutkowski JV, Levin BC. Acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene copolymers(ABS): Pyrolysis and combustion products and their toxicity-a review of the literature. Fire Mater. 1986; 10(3-4): 93-105.   DOI
23 Park J, Ham S, Jang M, Lee J, Kim S, Kim S, et al. Spatial-Temporal Dispersion of Aerosolized Nanoparticles During the Use of Consumer Spray Products and Estimates of Inhalation Exposure. Environ Sci Technol. 2017; 51(13): 7624-7638.   DOI
24 Nazarenko Y, Lioy PJ, Mainelis G. Quantitative assessment of inhalation exposure and deposited dose of aerosol from nanotechnology-based consumer sprays. Environ Sci Nano. 2014; 1: 161-171.   DOI
25 Azimi P, Fazli T, Stephens B. Predicting concentrations of ultrafine particles and volatile organic compounds resulting from desktop 3D printer operation and the impact of potential control strategies. J Ind Ecol 2017; 21(S1): S107-S119.   DOI
26 Wong KV, Hernandez A. A review of additive manufacturing. ISRN Mecha Eng. 2012: 1-10.
27 Noorani R. Rapid prototyping: principles and applications. New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc.; 2006.
28 Vance ME, Pegues V, Van Montfrans S, Leng W, Marr LC. Aerosol emissions from fuse-deposition modeling 3D printers in a chamber and in real indoor environments. Environ Sci Technol. 2017; 51(17): 9516-9523.   DOI