Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5668/JEHS.2011.37.4.267

Exposure Assessment to Particulates and Noise among Sculptors at a College of Fine Art  

Cho, Hyun-Woo (Department of Environmental Health, Graduate School of Public Health and Institute of Health and Environment, Seoul National University)
Yoon, Chung-Sik (Department of Environmental Health, Graduate School of Public Health and Institute of Health and Environment, Seoul National University)
Ham, Seung-Hon (Department of Environmental Health, Graduate School of Public Health and Institute of Health and Environment, Seoul National University)
Lee, Lim-Kyu (Department of Environmental Health, Graduate School of Public Health and Institute of Health and Environment, Seoul National University)
Park, Ji-Hoon (Department of Environmental Health, Graduate School of Public Health and Institute of Health and Environment, Seoul National University)
Park, Dong-Jin (Department of Environmental Health, Graduate School of Public Health and Institute of Health and Environment, Seoul National University)
Chung, Jin-Ho (Institute of Environmental Protection and Safety, Seoul National University)
Yeom, Jong-Soo (Institute of Environmental Protection and Safety, Seoul National University)
Seo, Kyu-Jin (Institute of Environmental Protection and Safety, Seoul National University)
Publication Information
Journal of Environmental Health Sciences / v.37, no.4, 2011 , pp. 267-278 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objectives: A great number of hazardous agents can be emitted from various types of art-creation in a fine arts college, but little data on exposure assessment has been published. A variety of processes encompassing toxic or non-toxic materials, tools, and components are involved in a sculptor work at a fine art college. The aim of this study was to assess exposure levels to particulates and noise during sculpture classes in a college of fine arts. Methods: Students in sculpture classes participated in this study. Mass, number, and surface area concentrations of particulates, noise level, temperature and relative humidity were monitored by both personal and area sampling during the tasks of metal, wood, and stone sculpting. Results: The number and surface concentration of particulates was the highest in the task of wood sculpting, followed by metal and stone work. The mass concentration of particulates was the highest in stone sculpting (personal GM 3.0 mg/$m^3$, GSD 3.0), followed by wood (personal GM 1.5 mg/$m^3$, GSD 1.8) and metal work (personal GM 0.95 mg/$m^3$, GSD 1.51) in that order. Occupational exposure limits (OEL) for particulates depends on the type of particulate. For wood dust, 86% (six subjects) of the personal samples and all area samples exceeded the Korean OEL for wood dust (1 mg/$m^3$), while 20% (two subjects) among stone sculpting students were exposed above the Korean OEL (10 mg/$m^3$). In contrast, metal sculpting did not exceed the OEL (5 mg/$m^3$). For noise level, metal sculpting students (Leq 95.1 dB(A) in the morning, 85.3 dB(A) in the afternoon) were exposed the most, followed by stone sculpting (88.3 dB(A)), and wood sculpting (84.8 dB(A)) in that order. Compared with the 90 dB(A) of the Korean OEL and 85 dB(A) of the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists' threshold limit value (ACGIH-TLV) for noise, 100% of the subjects (five subjects) and area samples during metal sculpting in the morning session exceeded both OELs, but only three subjects (60%) exceeded the ACGIH-TLV in the afternoon session. For stone sculpting, 50% (one subject) and 100% (two subjects) exceeded the Korean OEL and ACGIH-TLV, respectively, but the area sample did not exceed either OEL. During wood sculpting, two subjects (40%) exceeded ACGIH TLV. Conclusions: This work evaluated the sculptors' exposure to particulate matter and noise in fine art college, and revealed a poor working environment for the participating students. Effective measures should be supplemented by the administration of colleges.
Keywords
Sculptors; College of fine art; Noise; Fine particle;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Park JY, Ramachandran G, Raynor PC, Eberly LE, Olson G Jr. Comparison exposure zones by different exposure metrics using statistical parameters: contrast and precision. Ann Occup Hyg. 2010; 54(7): 799-812.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Buonanno G, Morawska L, Stabile L. Exposure to welding particles in automotive plants. J Aerosol Sci. 2011; 42: 295-304.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Methner M, Hodson L, Dames A, Geraci C. Nanoparticle emission assessment technique (NEAT) for the identification and measurement of potential inhalation exposure to engineered nanomaterials- Part B: results from 12 field studies. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2010; 7: 163-176.   DOI
4 Demange M, Gorner P, Elcabache J-M, Wrobel R. Field comparison of 37-mm closed-face cassettes and IOM samplers. Appl Occup Environ Hyg. 2002; 17(2): 200-208.   DOI
5 Yamanaka MW, Guidotti TL, Koehncke N, Taylor FM, Taylor C, Harman L. Wood dust levels in Alberta sawmills. Archives of Environmental & Occupational Health. 2009; 64(4): 270-277.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Flanagan ME, Seixas N, Majar M, Camp J, Morgan M. Silica dust exposures during selected construction activities. AIHA J. 2003; 64: 319-328.   DOI
7 Lee T, Harper M, Slaven JE, Lee KY, Rando RJ, Maples EH. Wood dust sampling: field evaluation of personal samplers when large particles are present. Ann Occup Hyg. 2011; 55(2): 180-191.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Junttila S, Tossavainen A, Hartikainen T, Harma P, Korhonen K, Suominen V, et al. Airborne mineral dust at nine crushed rock plants in Finland. Appl Occup Environ Hyg. 1997; 12(12): 882-886.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Fulekar MH. Occupational exposure to dust in quartz manufacturing industry. Ann Occup Hyg. 1999; 43(4): 269-273.   DOI
10 Hattis D. Occupational noise sources and exposures in construction industries. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment. 1998; 4(6): 1417-1441.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Landen D, Wilkins S, Stephenson M, McWilliams L. Noise exposure and hearing loss among sand and gravel miners. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2004; 1: 532- 541.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Gupta S, McCann M, Harrison J. Health hazards in the arts and crafts. Leonardo. 1991; 24(5): 569-572.   DOI
13 McCann MF. Occupational and environmental hazards in art. Environmental Research. 1992; 59: 139- 144.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Hamilton S. Health hazards and safety tips for artists. Canadian Artists Representation/Le Front Des Artistes Canadians (CARFAC), 2000.
15 U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC). Art and craft safety guide. Bethesda, MD 20814. Available from: http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/ pubs/5015.pdf [accessed 25 July 2011].
16 Ahman M, Soderman E, Cynkier I, Birgitta KH. Work-related respiratory problems in industrial arts teachers. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1995; 67: 111-118.   DOI
17 Ahmed HO, Dennis JH, Badran O, Ismail M, Ballal SG, Ashoor A, et al. Occupational noise exposure and hearing loss of workers in two plants in eastern Saudi arabia. Ann Occup Hyg. 2001; 45(5): 371-380.   DOI
18 Kim WT, Kim DH, Lee CK, Ahn JH, Lee CH, Kim HD, et al. Hearing asymmetry among occupationally noise-exposed workers. J Korean Soc Occup Environ Hyg. 2007; 17(2): 153-159.   과학기술학회마을
19 Shamssain MH. Pulmonary function and symptoms in workers exposed to wood dust. Thorax. 1992; 47: 84-87.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Parks CG, Conrad K, Cooper GS. Occupational exposure to crystalline silica and autoimmune disease. Environmental Health Perspectives. 1999; 107(5): 793-802.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Lumens MEGL, Spee T. Determinants of exposure to respirable quartz dust in the construction industry. Ann Occup Hyg. 2001; 45(7): 585-595.   DOI
22 Harris MK, Ewing WM, Longo W, EdPasquale C, Mount MD, Hatfield R, et al. Manganese exposures during shielded metal arc welding (SMAW) in an enclosed space. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2005; 2: 375-382.   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Meeker JD, Susi P, Flynn MR. Manganese and welding fume exposure and control in construction. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2007; 4: 943-951.   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Dasch J, D'Arcy J. Physical and chemical characterization of airborne particles from welding operations in automotive plants. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2008; 5: 444-454.   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Deam RT, Simpson SW, Haidar J. A semi-empirical model of the fume formation from gas metal arc welding. J Phys D Appl Phys. 2000; 33: 1393-1402.   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Schlunssen V, Vinzents PS, Mikkelsen AB, Schaumburg I. Wood dust exposure in the Danish furniture industry using conventional and passive monitors. Ann Occup Hyg. 2001; 45(2): 157-164.   DOI
27 Ministry of education, science and technology. The entrance quota of all colleges in Korea, 2010. Available: http://www.mest.go.kr/web/1114/ko/board/view. do?bbsId=153&boardSeq=15438 [accessed 25 July 2011].
28 Siedlecki JT. Potential health hazards of sculptors' materials. Pergamon Press. 1971; 4: 381-384.
29 Vincent JH, Clement CF. Ultrafine particles in workplace atmospheres. Phil Trans R Soc Lond A. 2000; 358: 2673-2682.   DOI   ScienceOn
30 Siedlecki JT. Potential health hazards of materials used by artists and sculptors. Art Education. 1972; 25: 21-26.
31 Hagaman S. Art hazards: concerns of the art teacher. Art Education. 1986; 39(3): 44-46.   DOI   ScienceOn
32 Niemeyer S, Rich W. Arts and crafts can be hazardous. Historical materials from university of nebraska-lincoln extension NF93-125; 1993.
33 Park K. Toxicity of nanomaterials and strategy of risk assessment. J Environ Toxicol. 2005; 20(4): 259-271.
34 Moroni B, Viti C. Grain size, chemistry, and structure of fine and ultrafine particles in stainless steel welding fumes. J Aerosol Sci. 2009; 40(11): 938- 949.   DOI   ScienceOn