Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5620/eht.e2014015

Nanowastes treatment in environmental media  

Kim, Younghun (Department of Chemical Engineering, Kwangwoon Univeristy)
Publication Information
Environmental Analysis Health and Toxicology / v.29, no., 2014 , pp. 15.1-15.7 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objectives This paper tried to review a recent research trend for the environmental exposure of engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) and its removal efficiency in the nanowaste treatment plants. Methods The studies on the predicted environmental concentrations (PEC) of ENMs obtained by exposure modeling and treatment (or removal) efficiency in nanowaste treatment facilities, such as wastewater treatment plant (WTP) and waste incineration plant (WIP) were investigated. The studies on the landfill of nanowastes also were investigated. Results The Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology group has led the way in developing methods for estimating ENM production and emissions. The PEC values are available for surface water, wastewater treatment plant effluents, biosolids, sediments, soils, and air. Based on the PEC modeling, the major routes for the environmental exposure of the ENMs were found as WTP effluents/sludge. The ENMs entered in the WTP were 90-99% removed and accumulated in the activated sludge and sludge cake. Additionally, the waste ash released from the WIP contain ENMs. Ultimately, landfills are the likely final destination of the disposed sludge or discarded ENMs products. Conclusions Although the removal efficiency of the ENMs using nanowaste treatment facilities is acceptable, the ENMs were accumulated on the sludge and then finally moved to the landfill. Therefore, the monitoring for the ENMs in the environment where the WTP effluent is discharged or biomass disposed is required to increase our knowledge on the fate and transport of the ENMs and to prevent the unintentional exposure (release) in the environment.
Keywords
Environmental exposure; Nanomaterials; Nanowastes; Wastewater treatment plant;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Brown SC, Boyko V, Meyers G, Voetz M, Wohlleben W. Toward advancing nano-object count metrology: a best practice framework. Environ Health Perspect 2013;121(11-12):1282-1291.
2 Lazareva A, Keller AA. Estimating potential life cycle releases of engineered nanomaterials from wastewater treatment plants. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 2014;2 (7):1656-1665.   DOI
3 Keller AA, Lazareva A. Predicted releases of engineered nanomaterials: from global to regional to local. Environ Sci Technol Lett 2014; 1(1):65-70.   DOI
4 Future Markets Inc. The global market for nanomaterials 2002-2016: production volumes, revenues and end user market demand. Edinburgh: Future Markets Inc.; 2012, p, 1-20.
5 Korea Chemicals Management Association. Development of guidance for investigation of usage amount of nanomaterials in Korea. Seoul: Korea Chemicals Management Association; 2011, 58-78 (Korean).
6 Batley GE, Kirby JK, McLaughlin MJ. Fate and risks of nanomaterials in aquatic and terrestrial environments. Acc Chem Res 2013; 46 (3):854-862.   DOI
7 Muller N. Nanoparticles in the environment : risk assessment based on exposure-modelling: what concentrations of nano titanium dioxide, carbon nanotubes and nano silver are we exposed to? [dissertation]. Zurich: Eidgenossische Technische Hochschule Zurich; 2007.
8 Gottschalk F, Sun T, Nowack B. Environmental concentrations of engineered nanomaterials: review of modeling and analytical studies. Environ Pollut 2013;181:287-300.   DOI
9 Boxall A, Chaudhry Q, Sinclair C, Jones A, Aitken R, Jefferson B, et al. Current and future predicted environmental exposure to engineered nanoparticles. London: Central Science Laboratory; 2007, 37-68.
10 Mueller NC, Nowack B. Exposure modeling of engineered nanoparticles in the environment. Environ Sci Technol 2008;42(12):4447-4453.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Gottschalk F, Sonderer T, Scholz RW, Nowack B. Modeled environmental concentrations of engineered nanomaterials (TiO(2), ZnO, Ag, CNT, Fullerenes) for different regions. Environ Sci Technol 2009;43(24):9216-9222.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 National Institute of Environmental Research. Assessment of environmental exposure of nanomaterials in aqueous phase. Incheon: National Institute of Environmental Research; 2013, p. 271-282 (Korean).
13 Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies. Consumer products inventory: an inventory of nanotechnology-based consumer products introduced on the market [cited 2014 Sep 27]. Available from: http://www.nanotechproject.org/cpi/.
14 von Goetz N, Lorenz C, Windler L, Nowack B, Heuberger M, Hungerbuhler K. Migration of Ag-and TiO2-(Nano)particles from textiles into artificial sweat under physical stress: experiments and exposure modeling. Environ Sci Technol 2013;47(17):9979-9987.   DOI
15 Gondikas AP, von der Kammer F, Reed RB, Wagner S, Ranville JF, Hofmann T. Release of TiO2 nanoparticles from sunscreens into surface waters: a one-year survey at the old Danube recreational Lake. Environ Sci Technol 2014;48(10):5415-5422.   DOI
16 Li L, Hartmann G, Doblinger M, Schuster M. Quantification of nanoscale silver particles removal and release from municipal wastewater treatment plants in Germany. Environ Sci Technol 2013;47(13): 7317-7323.
17 Liu J, Pennell KG, Hurt RH. Kinetics and mechanisms of nanosilver oxysulfidation. Environ Sci Technol 2011;45(17):7345-7353.   DOI
18 Limbach LK, Bereiter R, Muller E, Krebs R, Galli R, Stark WJ. Removal of oxide nanoparticles in a model wastewater treatment plant: influence of agglomeration and surfactants on clearing efficiency. Environ Sci Technol 2008;42(15):5828-5833.   DOI
19 Yang Y, Zhang C, Hu Z. Impact of metallic and metal oxide nanoparticles on wastewater treatment and anaerobic digestion. Environ Sci Process Impacts 2013;15(1):39-48.   DOI
20 Kiser MA, Westerhoff P, Benn T, Wang Y, Perez-Rivera J, Hristovski K. Titanium nanomaterial removal and release from wastewater treatment plants. Environ Sci Technol 2009;43(17):6757-6763.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Jarvie HP, Al-Obaidi H, King SM, Bowes MJ, Lawrence MJ, Drake AF, et al. Fate of silica nanoparticles in simulated primary wastewater treatment. Environ Sci Technol 2009;43(22):8622-8628.   DOI
22 Hou L, Li K, Ding Y, Li Y, Chen J, Wu X, et al. Removal of silver nanoparticles in simulated wastewater treatment processes and its impact on COD and NH(4) reduction. Chemosphere 2012;87(3): 248-252.   DOI
23 Walser T, Limbach LK, Brogioli R, Erismann E, Flamigni L, Hattendorf B, et al. Persistence of engineered nanoparticles in a municipal solid-waste incineration plant. Nat Nanotechnol 2012;7(8): 520-524.   DOI
24 Cheng H, Hu Y. Municipal solid waste (MSW) as a renewable source of energy: current and future practices in China. Bioresour Technol 2010;101(11):3816-3824.   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Vejerano EP, Holder AL, Marr LC. Emissions of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins, and dibenzofurans from incineration of nanomaterials. Environ Sci Technol 2013;47(9):4866-4874.   DOI
26 Mueller NC, Buha J, Wang J, Ulrich A, Nowack B. Modeling the flows of engineered nanomaterials during waste handling. Environ Sci Process Impacts 2013;15(1):251-259.   DOI
27 Yang Y, Gajaraj S, Wall JD, Hu Z. A comparison of nanosilver and silver ion effects on bioreactor landfill operations and methanogenic population dynamics. Water Res 2013;47(10):3422-3430.   DOI
28 Bolyard SC, Reinhart DR, Santra S. Behavior of engineered nanoparticles in landfill leachate. Environ Sci Technol 2013;47(15):8114-8122.