Browse > Article

Development of Korean Chemical Ranking and Scoring System (CRS-Korea) and its Application to Prioritizing National Toxic Chemicals  

Park Hoa-Sung (National Institute of Environmental Research)
Kim Ye-shin (Riskcom)
Lee Dong Soo (Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Seoul National University)
Shin Yong-seung (Korea Environment Institute)
Choi Seung-pil (Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Seoul National University)
Park Seong-eun (Environeer)
Kim Myung-hyun (Environeer)
Yang Ji-yeon (Institute for Environmental Research, Yonsei University)
Shin Dong-chun (Institute for Environmental Research, Yonsei University)
Publication Information
Environmental Analysis Health and Toxicology / v.20, no.2, 2005 , pp. 109-121 More about this Journal
Abstract
A chemical ranking and scoring (CRS-Korea) system was developed and proposed to use as the first step to prioritize the toxic chemicals for the purpose of monitoring and detailed risk assessment that might follow as necessary. The CRS-Korea system takes a basic concept of risk assessment (both human health risk and ecological risk) in that risk score is determined by the product of toxicity score and exposure score. Included in the toxicity category are acute toxicity, chronic/sub -chronic toxicity, carcinogenicity, and other toxicity. The exposure category consists of quantity released to the environment, bioconcentration, and persistence. A consistent scheme and a comprehensive chemical data base are offered in the CRS-Korea system to calculate a score for the each component in the two categories by using specific physicochemical, fate, and toxic properties and the quantity of the chemical used. The toxicity score is obtained by adding up all the individual scores for the components in the toxicity category. The exposure score is determined by multiplication of the score of the quantity released with the sum of persistent score and bioconcentration score. Equal weight is given to the toxicity score and the exposure score. As the CRS-Korea system was applied to identify 50 national priority chemicals, it was found that significant data gap exists on toxicity and fate properties and that the uncertainty associated with estimating the quantify released to the environment is notably high. The proposed CRS system is only a screening tool in the first step toward the priority setting and should be used with expert judgement and other considerations necessary.
Keywords
chemical ranking and scoring system; toxic chemicals; priority; risk;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 국립환경연구원. 화학물질 관리 체계 개선을 위한 기반 연구, 1996
2 HSDB (Hazardous Substances Data Bank). http://toxnet. nlm.nih.gov/cgi-bin/sis/htmlgen?HSDB, 2003
3 Mary BS and Adam CS. Chemical ranking and scoring: Guidelines for relative assessment of chemicals, SETAC press 1997a
4 US EPA. Comparative evaluation of chemical ranking and scoring methodology, 1994a
5 Environment Canada. The ARET substance selection process and guideline, 1994
6 박화성, 김예신, 이동수, 신동천. 대기중 유해 화학 물질의 인체 위해도우선순위 선정 연구, 한국환경독성학회지 2004; 19(1): 81-91
7 Environmental Canada. www.ec.gc.ca/ARET. 2003
8 NTP (Natioanl Toxicology Program). http://ntp-server.niehs.nih.gov/, 2003
9 환경부. 유독물 사용실적 보고(1999-2001), 2002
10 환경부. 유해화학물질관리법, 2004
11 Mary BS, Gary AD, Lori EK, Terry WS, John EB, Sheila LJ and Emma LG. A screening method for ranking and scoring chemicals by potential human health and environmental impacts, Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 1997b; 16(2): 372-383   DOI
12 김예신, 박화성, 이동수, 신동천. 화학물질 우선순위 선정 기법에 대한 비교 분석, 한국환경독성학회지 2003; 18(3): 183-191   과학기술학회마을   ScienceOn
13 IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer). httpt//www.iarc.fr/, 2003
14 환경부. 화학물질정보센터(KCIC, Korean Chemicals Information Center). http://kcic.nier.go.kr/, 2003
15 Hansen BG, Haelst AL et al. Priority setting for existing chemicals: The European Union risk ranking method, Environmental Toxicity and chemistry 1999; 18: 772-779   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Gary AD, Mary BS and Sheila J. Comparative evaluation of chemical ranking and scoring methodologies, US EPA 1994
17 Rachel RM, Cheryl LS, Shari AB et al. SCRAM: A Scoring and Ranking System for persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic Substances for the north american great lakes resulting chemical scores and ran kings, Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 2002; 8(3): 537-557   DOI
18 연세대학교 환경공해연구소 위해우려물질 선정 및 평가 연구, 환경부 2003
19 US EPA. Chemical hazard evaluation for management strategies; A method for ranking and scoring chemicals by potential human health and environmental impacts, 1994b
20 EU (European Union). IUCLID (International Uniform-Chemical Information Database), 1996
21 US EPA IRIS. www.epa.gov/iris, 2003
22 US EPA. EPIWIN (Estimation Programs Interface for Windows), 2000
23 Erin MS, Shane AS, John PG et al. SCRAM: A Scoring and Ranking System for Persistent, Bioaccumulative, and Toxic Substances for the North American Great Lakes-Part I : Structure of the Scoring and Ranking System, Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2000; 7(1): 1-11   DOI   ScienceOn