Browse > Article

A Classic Viewpoint on Fish Removal Biomanipulation in Whole-lake Studies  

Chung, Sang-Ok (Harmful Algal Blooming Control Laboratory (HABCL)-NRL, Kongju National University)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Ecology and Environment / v.36, no.3, 2003 , pp. 375-380 More about this Journal
Abstract
For some decades eutrophication poses a great problem in water quality management in fresh-waters. To solve this problem, studies based on "bottom-up" hypothesis have been mostly carried out worldwidely unlike biomanipulation. This implies that not only fish but also fish stock playa key role down to other food web components in pelagic ecosystem. It is generally accepted that biomanipulation becomes a potent tool for eutrophication control. For a practical application of this, however, further development and understanding of the food web under the specific lake condition on a whole-lake scale are needed. The question is how can we maintain the positive effects resulted from biomanipulation (fortuitous or planned) for a long period.
Keywords
fish removal hiornanipulation;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Chung, S.O. 2001. Phytoplankton dynamics and recolonizationafter a biomanipulation of the Pontde-Salars reservoir, Thèse de 3ème cycle. Univ.Toulouse III. 174pp.
2 Drenner, R.W. and K.D.Hambright. 1999. Biomanipulationof fish assemblages as a lake restorationtechnique. Arch. Hydrobiol. 146: 129-165.
3 Hrbᡠcek, J., M. Dvoˇrakova, V. Koˇrínek and L. Procházkóva.1961. Demonstration of the effect of thefish stockon the species composition of zooplanktonand the intensity of metabolism of the wholeplankton association. Verh. Int. Verein. Limnol.14: 192-195.
4 Jeppesen, E., M. Sondergaard, J.P. Jensen, E. Mortensenand O. Sortkaer. 1996. Fish-induced changesin zooplankton on phytoplankton and bacterioplankton:a long-term study in shallow hypertrophicLake Sobygaard. J. Plankton Res. 18: 1605-1625.
5 Jeppesen, E., M. Sondergaard, T. Lauridsen, L. Jungeand L. Jensen. 1997. Top-down control in freshwaterlakes: the role of nutrient state, submergedmacrophytes and water depth. Hydrobiol. 342/343: 151-164.
6 McQueen, D.J., J.R. Prost and E.L. Mills. 1986. Tro-phic relationshps in freshwater pelagic ecosystems.Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 43: 1571-1581.
7 McQueen, D.J. 1998. Freshwater food web biomanipulation:A powerful tool for water quality improvement,but maintenance is required. Lake andReserv. Manage. 3: 83-94.
8 Meijer, M.-L., M.W. de Haan, A.W. Brekelaar and H.Buiteveld. 1990. Is reduction of benthivorous fishan important cause of high transparency followingmanipulation in small lakes. Hydrobiol. 200/201: 303-315.
9 Schindler, D.W. 1988. Experimental studies of chemicalstressors on whole-lake ecosystems. Verh.Int. Verein. Limnol. 23: 11-41.
10 Shapiro, J. 1990. Biomanipulation : the next phasemakingit stable. Hydrobiol. 200/201: 13-17.
11 Shapiro, J. and D.I. Wright. 1984. Lake restorationby biomanipulations. Round Lake, Minnesota-thefirst two years. Freshwat. Biol. 14: 371-383.
12 van Donk, E., R.D. Gluati and M.P. Grimm. 1989.Food-web manipulation of Lake Zwemlust : Positiveand negative effects during the first two years.Hydrobiol. Bull. 23: 19-35.
13 Vighi, M., D. Sandroni and G. Ferri. 1995. Biomanipulationof trophic chain in two small eutrophiclakes. Mem. Ist. Ital. Idrobiol. 53: 157-175.
14 Francisco, P. and J.-N. Tourenq. 1997. The drainageof a large reservoir considered as an experimental biomanipulation. First results: fish control on thestructure and biochemical composition of plankton.Annls. Limnol. 33: 121-133.
15 Odum, E.P. 1971. Fundamentals of ecology (3rd ed.),W.B. Saunders Com., Philadelphia : 574pp.
16 Prejs, A., J. Pijanowaska, P. Koperski., A. Martyniak,S. Boron and P. Hilwa. 1997. Food-web manipulationin a small, eutophic Lake Wirbel, Poland:Long-term changes in fish biomass : a basic measureof water quality. A case study. Hydrobiol.342/343: 383-386.
17 Reynolds, C.S. 1997. Vegetation processes in the pelagic:a model for ecosystem theory : Excellence onecology N􀆆9. Ecology Institute. Oldendorf/LuheGermany. 371pp.
18 Hjerne, O. and S. Hansson. 2002. The role of fish andfisheries in Baltic Sea nutrient dynamics. Limnol.Oceanogr. 47(4): 1023-1032.
19 Reinertsen, H., A. Jensen, J.I. Koksvik, A. Langelandand Y. Olsen. 1990. Effects of fish removal on thelimnetic ecosystem of a eutrophic lake. Can. J.Fish. Aquat. Sci. 47: 166-173.
20 Pijanowska, J. and A. Prejs. 1997. Food-web manipulationin shallow, eutrophic lakes : Bridging thegap between the whole-lake approach and behaviouraland demographic studies. Hydrobiol. 342/343: 305-310.
21 Stenson, J.A.E., T. Bohlin and L. Henrikson et al.1978. Effects of fish removal in a small lake. Verh.Int. Verein. Limnol. 20: 794-801.
22 Phillips, G.F. and B. Moss. 1993. Is biomanipulationan useful technique in lake management? National NationalRivers Authority, Bristol: pp. 1-43.
23 Reynolds, C.S. 1994. Invited review: The ecologicalbasis for the successful biomanipulation of aquaticcommunities. Arch. Hydrobiol. 130: 1-33.
24 Edmonson, W.T. 1994a. Experiments and quasi-experimentsin limnology. Bull. Mar. Sci. 53: 65-83.
25 Gulati, R.D., E.H.R.R. Lammens, M.-L. Meijer andE. van Donk. 1990. Biomanipulation-tool for watermanagement. Hydrobiol. 200/201: 627pp.
26 Lathrop, R.C., S.R. Carpenter and L.G. Rudstam. 1996. Water clarity in Lake Mendota since 1900 : responses to differing levels of nutrients and herbivory. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 53: 2250-2261.
27 Vollenweider, R.A. 1976. Advances in defining criticalload levels for phosphorus in lake eutrophication.Mem. Ist. Ital. Idrobiol. 33: 53-83.
28 Shapiro, J. 1995. Lake restoration by biomanipulation-a personal view. Environ. Rev. 3: 83-93.
29 van Donk, E., M.P. Grimm, R.D. Gulati and J.P.G.Klein Breteler. 1990. Whole-lake food-web manipulationas a means to study community interactionsin a small ecosystem. Hydrobiol. 200/201:275-289.
30 Horppila, J., H. Peltonen, T. Malinen, E. Luokkanenand T. Kairesalo. 1998. Top-down or bottom-upeffects by fish: Issues of concerns in biomanipulationof lakes. Restoration Ecology 6: 20-28.
31 Søndergaard, M., E. Jeppesen, E. Mortensen, E. Dall,P. Kristensen and O. Sortkjaer. 1990. Phytoplanktonbiomass reduction after planktivorousfish reduction in a shallow, eutrophic lake : acombined effect of reduced internal P-loading andincreased zooplankton grazing. Hydrobiol. 200/201: 229-240.
32 Lammens, E.H. R.R., R.D. Gulati, M.-L. Meijer andE. van Donk. 1990. The first biomanipulation conference: a synthesis. Hydrobiol. 200/201: 619-627.
33 Meijer, M.-L. and H. Hosper. 1997. Effects of biomanipulationin the large and shallow Lake Wolderwijd,The Netherlands. Hydrobiol. 342/343: 335-349.
34 Benndorf, J. 1995. Possibilities and limits for controllingeutrophication by biomanipulation. Int.Revue. ges. Hydrobiol. 80: 519-534.
35 Breukelaar, A.W., E.H.R. Lammens, J.P.G. KleinBreteler and I. Tatrani. 1994. Effect of benthivorousbream (Albramis brama L.) and carp (Cyprinuscaprio L.) on sediment resuspension and concentrationsof nutrients and chlorophyll a. Freshwat.Biol. 32: 113-121.
36 Edmonson, W.T. 1994b. Sixty years of Lake Washington: A curriculum vitae. Lake Reservoir Manage.10: 75-84.
37 Goldyn, R., A. Kozak and W. Romanowicz. 1997.Food-web manipulation in the Maltànski Reservoir.Hydrobiol. 342/343: 319-325.
38 Hanson, M.A. and M.G. Butler. 1994. Responses ofplankton, turbidity, and macrophytes to biomanipulationin a shallow Prairie Lake. Can. J. Fish.Aquat. Sci. 51: 1180-1188.
39 Kasprzak, P., L. Krienitz and R. Koschell. 1993.Changes in the plankton of Lake Feldberger Haussee(Germany, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern) in responseto biomanipulation. Arch. Hydrobiol. 128:149-168.
40 Carpenter, S.R., J.F. Kitchell and J.R. Hodgson. 1985.Cascading trophic interactions and lake Productivity:Fish predation and herbivory can regulatelake ecosystems. BioScience 35: 634-639.
41 Vanni, M.J., C. Luecke, J.F. Kitchell and J.J. Magnuson.1990. Effects of planktivorous fish mortalityon the plankton community of Lake Mendota,Wisconsin : Implications for biomanipulation.Hydrobiol. 200/201: 329-336.
42 Meijer, M.-L., E. Jeppesen, E. van Donk, B. Moss, M.Scheffer, E. Lammens, E. van Nes, J.A. vanBerkum, G.J. de Jong, B.A. Faafeng and J.P.Jensen. 1994. Long-term responses to fish-stockreduction in small shallow lakes : interpretationof five-year results of four biomanipulation casesin The Netherlands and Denmark. Hydrobiol.275/276: 457-466.
43 Shapiro, J., V. Mamara and M. Lynch. 1975. Biomanipulation: an ecosystem approach to lake restoration,In: Proc. Sym. on Water quality managementthrough biological control (Brezonik and Foxeds.). University of Florida, pp. 85-99.
44 Gophen, M. 1990. Biomanipulation : retrospectiveand future development. Hydrobiol. 200/201: 1-11.
45 Johnson, T.B. and J.F. Kitchell. 1996. Long-termchanges in zooplanktivorous fish community composition:implications for food webs. Can. J. Fish.Aquat. Sci. 53: 2792-2803.