Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14249/eia.2022.31.6.359

Evaluating Implementation Rate of Wildlife Mitigation Measures in the Environmental Impact Assessment  

Ji-Hoon, Lee (Department of Landscape Architecture, Yeungnam University)
Eun-Sub, Kim (Interdisciplinary program in Landscape Architecture, Seoul National University)
Yong-Won, Mo (Department of Landscape Architecture, Yeungnam University)
Dong-Kun, Lee (Department of Landscape Architecture and Rural System Engineering, Seoul National University)
Publication Information
Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment / v.31, no.6, 2022 , pp. 359-368 More about this Journal
Abstract
It is essential to increase the implementation rate in order to increase the effectiveness of mitigation measures that can mitigate the negative impact of development projects. In the case of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA),research on the implementation evaluation of development projects is insufficient, even though the effectiveness of mitigation measures has been steadily raised. Therefore, this study evaluated the implementation rate of the mitigation measures and identified the cause of the difference in the implementation rate for each mitigation measures in order to understand the current status of the ecological mitigation measures. The implementation rate of urban and road development projects mitigation measures was 56.0% and 64.4%, respectively. the implementation rate of 'Monitoring' mitigation measures was the highest in all development project. But, 'Habitat creation' and 'Accident prevention measures' were low. In addition, it was found that the implementation rate of the mitigation measures were high when the contents of the mitigation measure described in the report were specific. Through this study, it was found that in order to increase the implementation rate of the EIA ecological environment animal mitigation measures, it is necessary to reflect the environmental and geographical characteristics of the target site in detail. Furthermore, it is judged that this study can be used as a basic basis for enhancing the effectiveness of the EIA system introduced to mitigate the negative impact on the environment.
Keywords
Urban development; Monitoring; Ecological mitigation measure; Effectiveness;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Briggs S, Malcolm DH. 2013. Determination of significance in Ecological Impact Assessment: Past change. current practice and future improvements 38: 16-25.
2 Caro-Gonzalez AL, Toro J, Zamorano M. 2021. Effectiveness of environmental impact statement methods: A Colombian case study. Journal of Environmental Management. 300.
3 Comprehensive Plan for Conservation of Endangered Wildlife. 2018. Ministry of Environment. [Korean Literature]
4 Cho KJ, Choi JK, Park YM, Song YI, Sa KH, Lee SB, Jeong JC, Lim YS. 2008. Achievement and Development of EIA over the last 30 years. Korea Environment Institute. [Korean Literature]
5 EIASS. https://www.eiass.go.kr
6 Drayson K, Thompson S. 2013. Ecological mitigation measures in English Environmental Impact Assessment, Journal of Environmental Management. 119: 103-110.
7 Drayson K, Wood G, Thompson S. 2015. Assessing the quality of the ecological component of English Environmental Statements. Journal of Environmental Management: 241-253.
8 Kim JO, Min BW. 2020. Problems and Improvement Strategies of Environmental Impact Assessment by Local Government in South Korea - Case Studies of 8 Local Governments including Seoul, Jeju, Busan and Daejeon -, Journal of Envinronmental Impact Assessment 29(2): 132-143 [Korean Literature]
9 Kim MK, Lee SD. 2021. Survey on the perception of stakeholders on the EIA System in Korea. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment 30(1): 49-60 [Korean Literature]   DOI
10 Korea Environment Institute. 2017. EIA Guideline Series A Ver 2.0. [Korean Literature]
11 Korea Environment Institute. 2004. Environmental Impact Assessment of Road Construction Projects: Analysis of Prediction and Monitoring. [Korean Literatue]
12 Lhyne I, Laerhoven F, Cashmore M, Runaar H. 2017. Theorising EIA effectiveness: A contribution based on the Danish system. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 62: 240-249   DOI
13 Ministry of Environment. 2009. Guidelines for the preparation of EIA reports for the preparation of EIA reports by project type. Government of Korea. [Korean Literature]
14 Ministry of Environment. 2020. environment impact asseessment follow-up management guidebook. Government of Korea. [Korean Literature]
15 Ministry of Environment. 2021. Management Manager's Guide to Environmental Impact Assessment Consultation. [Korean Literature]
16 Park JH, Choi JG. 2016. A Study on Future Direction and Practical Strategy for the Development of Environmental Impact Assessment Follow-Up. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment 25(3): 165-174. [Korean Literature]   DOI
17 Sanchez LE, Gallardo ALCF. 2012. On the successful implementation of mitigation measures. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 23(3): 182-190.   DOI
18 Zhang J, Kornov L, Christensen P. 2013. Critical factors for EIA implementation: Literature review and research options. Journal of Environmental Management, 114: 148-157.
19 Treweek JR, Thompson S, Veitch N, Japp C. 1993. Ecological assessment of proposed road developments: a review of envrionmental statement, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 36(3): 295-307.   DOI
20 Yi PI, Yi YK. 1997. Content Analysis of Mitigation Measures in Environmental Impact Statement, Korean Society of ENvironmental Impact Assessment 6(2): 165-180. [Korean Literature]