Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14249/eia.2021.30.6.361

Stakeholder Perception on the Transplanting Damaged Trees  

Moon, Yoonjung (Division of Ecological Assessment, National Institute of Ecology)
Park, Hongjun (Division of Ecological Assessment, National Institute of Ecology)
Cha, Jaegyu (Division of Ecological Assessment, National Institute of Ecology)
Na, Jinjoo (Division of Ecological Assessment, National Institute of Ecology)
Lee, Seonmi (Division of Ecological Assessment, National Institute of Ecology)
Publication Information
Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment / v.30, no.6, 2021 , pp. 361-379 More about this Journal
Abstract
About 10% of trees damaged by the development projects are to be transplanted when conducting the Environmental Impact Assessment. However, various problems have been raised during transplantation. In this study, we confirm the stakeholder's perceptions of the problems that occur during transplantation. The survey was conducted from October 9 to 25, 2020. Among the stakeholder groups, 36 respondents participated in the consulting institute group, 44 from the review institute group, and 83 from the developer·agency group (total of 163). All three groups responded that it was necessary to transplant some of the damaged trees even if the development charge increased because the damage caused by the development project was serious. The most serious problem was 'high mortality'. The response rate was high that all three groups should plant the same species with the same quantity as an alternative method in case of withering. In order to reduce the mortality rate, small-sized trees were transplanted and transplanted trees were expanded to include planted species and landscape trees. In addition, the number of transplanted trees was high in response to calculating the transplantratio to the number of native tree damaged. The percentage of respondents who said that it was necessary to allocate a separate manager was also high. The results will be used as basic data to improve problems that occur during transplantation of damaged trees.
Keywords
Environmental impact assessment; Temporary transplantation; Transplanted tree; Tree death; Tree mortality rate;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Ban YU, Joo KS, Jeong HK, Hwang GH. 2010. Improvement of EIS Documentation & Consultation Precess through Expert Survey Method 19(2): 141-151. [Korean Literature]
2 Lee SC, Jo BY, Choi SH. 2015. A Study of Establishment Ratio of Native Tree Transplant. J. KILA. 43(2): 23-29. [Korean Literature]
3 Lee JH. 2020. Environmental Impact Assessment Consultation Based on Land Environment and Natural & Ecological Environment. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment 29(1): 45-46. [Korean Literature]   DOI
4 Cho HR. 2010. Cost effectiveness depending on the Native Tree Treatment Methods. MS degree, Graduate School of Chungnam National University, p. 82. [Korean Literature]
5 Cho HR, Kim SB, Oh DK. 2009. Cost effectiveness depending on the native tree treatment methods. Journal of the Korean Society of Environmental Restoration Technology 12(6): 51-62. [Korean Literature]
6 Commission of the European Communities. 1985. Council directive of 27 Jun 1985 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment. Official Journal of the European Communities L175: 40-48.
7 Korea Land Development Corporation. 1994. The Study of Utilizing Wild Plants in Land Development District-Focused on New Town (Bundang and Ilsan)-. Korea Land Development Corporation Report, p. 113. [Korean Literature]
8 Korea Land & Housing Corporation. 2020. LH Construction Specification. [Korean Literature]
9 Lee HS, Im JH. 2019. SPSS new UI manual. Jyphyunjae, Seoul. p. 200. [Korean Literature]
10 Lee SD, Choi SH. 2009. Study on the Selection Criteria for Transplanting Trees in the Forest Reserve Areas Designated for Future Development. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology 23(6): 535-544. [Korean Literature]
11 Lee SD, Kang HK. 2012. Transplantation Method of Damage Ecosystem Associated with Development of the Borrow Pits. Kor. J. Env. Eco. 26(3): 394-405. [Korean Literature]
12 Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. 2019. Standard specification for landscaping construction. Notice of Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport 2019-387 (2019.7.26.). [Korean Literature]
13 National Institute of Ecology. 2020. Operational improvement of temporary transplant site in Environmental Impact Assessment, p. 76. [Korean Literature]
14 Pak SI, Oh TH. 2010. The application of Analysis of variance (ANOVA). Journal of Veterianary Clinics 27(1): 71-78. [Korean Literature]
15 Cronbach LJ, Shavelson RJ. 2004. My current thoughts on coefficient alpha and successor procedures. Educational and Psychological Measurement 64(3): 391-418.   DOI
16 Glasson J, Therivel R, Chadwick A. 2005. Introduction to Environmental Impact Assessment. Principles and procedures, process, practice and prospects (3rd edition). UCL Press, London, p. 448.
17 Jay S, Jones C, Slinn P, Wood C. 2007. Environmental impact assessment: Retrospect and prospect. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 27: 287-300. DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2006.12.001.   DOI
18 Kim JH. 2019. Stakeholder perceptions of cultural heritage utilization. Internation Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research 33(1): 51-66. [Korean Literature]   DOI
19 Kim SM, Lee IS. 2007. The Issues of Topsoil Preservation in Land Development Projects. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 35(2): 91-96. [Korean Literature]
20 Korea Environment Institute. 2015. 「EIA Guideline Series A(Ver1.0)」. p. 7. [Korean Literature]
21 Cho NW. 2020. An Empirical Study on the Institutional Change of Environmental Impact Assessment: Focused on Agreed Terms. Ph.D. Dissertation, graduate school of Yonsei University, p. 172. [Korean Literature]
22 Park CM. 2002. The Restoration Technique of Native Forest Resources on the Development Land applied in the New Campus of Kyushu University, Japan. Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology 5(3): 50-57. [Korean Literature]
23 EIASS (Environmental Impact Assessment Information Suport System). Consultation status statistics. https://www.eiass.go.kr/statistic/statusStatsNew.do (2021.1.23. accessed). [Korean Literature]
24 National Law Information Center. The Environmental Impact Assessment Act. https://www.law.go.kr/lsSc.do?section=&menuId=1&subMenuId=15&tabMenuId=81&eventGubun=060101&query=%ED%99%98%EA%B2%BD%EC%98%81%ED%96%A5%ED%8F%89%EA%B0%80%EB%B2%95#undefined (2021.1.23. accessed). [Korean Literature]
25 Korea Environment Institute. 2017. 「EIA Guideline Series A(Ver2.0)」. p. 21. [Korean Literature]
26 Korea Forest Service. 2020. Statistical Yearbook of Forestry. [Korean Literature]
27 Wood C. 2002. Environmental Impact Assessment: A Comparative Review (2nd edition). Routledge, New York, p. 430.
28 Jung SG. 2012. An Analysis on the use situation of the reusing Landscape tree in lanscaping of re-construction Apartment Complex. Ma degree, the Graduate School of Engineering, Hanyang University, p. 143. [Korean Literature]