Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14249/eia.2020.29.5.377

A Study on Fauna Habitat Valuation of Urban Ecological Maps  

Park, Minkyu (Spatial Ecology Lab RAUM. Co.)
Publication Information
Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment / v.29, no.5, 2020 , pp. 377-390 More about this Journal
Abstract
URBAN ECOLOGICAL MAPS must be created by local governments by NATURAL ENVIRONMENT CONSERVATION ACT, and the maps are generally called biotope map. So far, biotope maps study was a tendency to focus on the type of vegetation, naturalness, land use, landscape ecology theories. However, biotope related studies have not reflected the concept of animal habitat, which is a component of biotope, and that is the limitation of biotope map research. This study suggest a methodology to predict potential habitats for fauna using machine learning to quantify habitat values. The potential habitats of fauna were predicted by spatial statistics using machine learning, and the results were converted into species richness. For biotope type assessments, we classified biotope values into vegetation value and habitat value and evaluated them using a matrix for value summation. The vegetation value was divided into 5 stages based on vegetation nature and land use, and the habitat value was classified into five stages by predicting the species richness predicted by machine learning. This is meaningful because our research can positively reflect the results of field surveys of fauna that were negatively reflected in the evaluation of biotope types in the past. Therefore, in the future, if the biotope map manual is revised, our methodology should be applied.
Keywords
Biotope; Biotope map; Spatial ecology; Machine learning; Habitat;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Allouche O, Tsoar A, Kadmon R. 2006. Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models: prevalence, kappa and the true skill statistic (TSS). Journal of applied ecology 43, 1223-1232.   DOI
2 d'Amen M, Dubuis A, Fernandes RF, Pottier J, Pellissier L, Guisan A. 2015. Using species richness and functional traits predictions to constrain assemblage predictions from stacked species distribution models. Journal of biogeography 42, 1255-1266.   DOI
3 Andersen MC, Watts JM, Freilich JE, Yool SR, Wakefield GI, McCauley JF, Fahnestock PB. 2000. Regression-tree modeling of desert tortoise habitat in the central Mojave Desert. Ecological Applications 10, 890-900.   DOI
4 Andren H, Angelstam P. 1988. Elevated predation rates as an edge effect in habitat islands: experimental evidence. Ecology 69, 544-547.   DOI
5 Araujo MB, New M. 2007. Ensemble forecasting of species distributions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 22, 42-47.   DOI
6 Attrill MJ, Rundle SD. 2002. Ecotone or ecocline: ecological boundaries in estuaries. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 55(6), 929-936.   DOI
7 Bascompte J, Jordano P. 2007. Plant-animal mutualistic networks: the architecture of biodiversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 38, 567-593.   DOI
8 Wintle BA, Elith J, Potts JM. 2005. Fauna habitat modelling and mapping: a review and case study in the Lower Hunter Central Coast region of NSW. Austral Ecology 30, 719-738.   DOI
9 Sukopp H, Weiler S. 1988. Biotope mapping and nature conservation strategies in urban areas of the Federal Republic of Germany. Landscape and urban planning 15, 39-58.   DOI
10 Vazquez DP, Bluthgen N, Cagnolo L, Chacoff NP. 2009. Uniting pattern and process in plant-animal mutualistic networks: a review. Annals of botany 103, 1445-1457.   DOI
11 Wright JF. 1995. Development and use of a system for predicting the macroinvertebrate fauna in flowing waters. Australian Journal of Ecology 20, 181-197.   DOI
12 Chetkiewicz C-LB, St. Clair CC, Boyce MS. 2006. Corridors for Conservation: Integrating Pattern and Process. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 37, 317-342.   DOI
13 Bleyhl B, Sipko T, Trepet S, Bragina E, Leitao PJ, Radeloff VC. Kuemmerle T. 2015. Mapping seasonal European bison habitat in the Caucasus Mountains to identify potential reintroduction sites. Biological Conservation 191, 83-92.   DOI
14 Breininger DR, Provancha MJ, Smith RB. 1991. Mapping Florida scrub jay habitat for purposes of land-use management.
15 Buckley LB, Urban MC, Angilletta MJ, Crozier LG, Rissler LJ, Sears MW. 2010. Can mechanism inform species' distribution models?. Ecology letters 13, 1041-1054.   DOI
16 Choi IK, Ahn GY, Lee EH. 2007. A Comparative Study of Biotope Mapping between Korea and Germany. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology 21, 565-575. [Korean Literature]
17 Choi N, Kil J, Shin Y. 2017. Exploring the Application of Impact Mitigation Regulations through Biotope Maps. Ecology and Resilient Infrastructure 4, 237-244. [Korean Literature]   DOI
18 Choi IK, Lee EH. 2007. A Study on the Classification of Biotope Type in Germany. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 35, 73-81. [Korean Literature]
19 Choi IK, Oh CH, Ahn GY, Lee E-H. 2009. The suggestion for evaluation items and system for assessment of biotope. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology 23, 594-602. [Korean Literature]
20 Yahner RH. 1988. Changes in wildlife communities near edges. Conservation biology 2, 333-339.   DOI
21 Zhang C, Ma Y (Eds.). 2012. Ensemble machine learning: methods and applications. Springer Science & Business Media.
22 Zimmermann NE, Edwards TC, Graham CH, Pearman PB, Svenning JC. 2010. New trends in species distribution modelling. Ecography 33, 985-989.   DOI
23 Franklin J, Steadman DW. 1991. The potential for conservation of Polynesian birds through habitat mapping and species translocation. Conservation Biology 5, 506-521.   DOI
24 Choi IK, Oh CH, Lee EH. 2008. The suggestion for classification of biotope type for nationwide application. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology 22, 666-678. [Korean Literature]
25 Coops NC, Catling PC. 1997. Predicting the complexity of habitat in forests from airborne videography for wildlife management. International Journal of Remote Sensing 18, 2677-2682.   DOI
26 Distler T, Schuetz JG, Velasquez-Tibata J, Langham GM. 2015. Stacked species distribution models and macroecological models provide congruent projections of avian species richness under climate change. Journal of Biogeography 42, 976-988.   DOI
27 Druon JN. 2010. Habitat mapping of the Atlantic bluefin tuna derived from satellite data: Its potential as a tool for the sustainable management of pelagic fisheries. Marine Policy 34, 293-297.   DOI
28 Fortuna MA, Bascompte J. 2006. Habitat loss and the structure of plant-animal mutualistic networks. Ecology letters 9, 281-286.   DOI
29 Graham CH, Moritz C, Williams SE. 2006. Habitat history improves prediction of biodiversity in rainforest fauna. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103, 632-636.   DOI
30 Hao T, Elith J, Guillera-Arroita G, Lahoz-Monfort JJ. 2019. A review of evidence about use and performance of species distribution modelling ensembles like BIOMOD. Diversity and Distributions 25, 839-852.   DOI
31 Kim HS. 2012. Classification Biotope Type and Evaluation Value of Individual Biotope: Landscape Ecological Approaches. Dissertation for Ph.D. Thesis. Dongguk University. [Korean Literature]
32 Haslett JR. 1990. Geographic information systems. A new approach to habitat definition and the study of distributions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 5, 214-218.   DOI
33 Jarvis PJ, Young CH. 2005. The mapping of urban habitat and its evaluation. Wolverhampton, University of Wolverhampton 19.
34 Jordano P, Bascompte J, Olesen JM. 2003. Invariant properties in coevolutionary networks of plant-animal interactions. Ecology letters 6, 69-81.   DOI
35 Jung SH, Kim DU, Lim BS, Kim AR, Seol J, Lee CS. 2019. Classification, Analysis on Attributes and Sustainable Management Plan of Biotop Established in Pohang City. Korean Journal of Ecology and Environment 52, 245-265. [Korean Literature]   DOI
36 Ki KS. 2011. Application of Green Recreation Opportunity Based on Biotope Evaluation of Rural Region in the Seoul Metropolitan Area, Korea: A Case of Yangpeong-Gun, Gyeonggi-Do. Dissertation for Ph.D. Thesis. University of Seoul. [Korean Literature]
37 Kim HS, Jang NR. 2019. Gyeonggi-do's Biotope Map Issues and Alternatives. Issue & Diagnosis, 1-26.[Korean Literature]
38 Kim JS, Jung TJ, Hong SH. 2015. Biotope type classification based on the vegetation community in built-up area. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology 29, 454-461.[Korean Literature]   DOI
39 Liu C, White M, Newell G. 2013. Selecting thresholds for the prediction of species occurrence with presence-only data. Journal of biogeography 40, 778-789.   DOI
40 Magura T. 2002. Carabids and forest edge: spatial pattern and edge effect. Forest Ecology and management 157, 23-37.   DOI
41 Oh JH, Cho JH, Cho HJ, Choi MS, Kwon J. 2008. A Study on the Biotope Evaluation and Classification of Urban Forests for Landscape Ecological Management. Journal of the Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies 11, 101-111. [Korean Literature]
42 McComb WC, McGrath MT, Spies TA, Vesely D. 2002. Models for mapping potential habitat at landscape scales: an example using northern spotted owls. Forest Science 48, 203-216.
43 Miyamoto A, Tamura N, Sugimura K, Yamada F. 2004. Predicting habitat distribution of the alien Formosan squirrel using logistic regression model. Global environmental research-english edition- 8, 13-22.
44 Mykra H, Aroviita J, Kotanen J, Hamalainen H, Muotka T. 2008. Predicting the stream macroinvertebrate fauna across regional scales: influence of geographical extent on model performance. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 27, 705-716.   DOI
45 Naimi B, Araujo MB. 2016. sdm: a reproducible and extensible R platform for species distribution modelling. Ecography 39, 368-375.   DOI
46 National law information center. 2019. Guidelines on urban ecological maps. URL http://www.law.go.kr/LSW/admRulLsInfoP.do?admRulSeq=2100000176310. [Korean Literature]
47 Pereira J, Itami R. 1991. GIS-based habitat modeling using logistic multiple regression- A study of the Mt. Graham red squirrel. Photogrammetric engineering and remote sensing 57, 1475-1486.
48 Pineda E, Lobo JM. 2009. Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models to predict amphibian species richness patterns. Journal of Animal Ecology 78, 182-190.   DOI
49 R Core Team. 2020. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/.
50 QGIS org. 2020. QGIS geographic information system. Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project. from http://qgis.org/.
51 Raes N, Roos MC, Slik JF, Van Loon EE and Steege H ter. 2009. Botanical richness and endemicity patterns of Borneo derived from species distribution models. Ecography 32, 180-192.   DOI
52 Randin CF, Dirnbock T, Dullinger S, Zimmermann NE, Zappa M, Guisan A. 2006. Are nichebased species distribution models transferable in space? Journal of biogeography 33, 1689-1703.   DOI