Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14249/eia.2018.27.4.367

Accessibility Analysis in Mapping Cultural Ecosystem Service of Namyangju-si  

Jun, Baysok (Bureau of Ecological Research, Division of Ecosystem Services & Research Planning, National Institute of Ecology)
Kang, Wanmo (Cheongju University, College of Science Engineering, Department of Urban Planning)
Lee, Jaehyuck (Bureau of Ecological Research, Division of Ecosystem Services & Research Planning, National Institute of Ecology)
Kim, Sunghoon (Bureau of Ecological Research, Division of Ecosystem Services & Research Planning, National Institute of Ecology)
Kim, Byeori (Bureau of Ecological Research, Division of Ecosystem Services & Research Planning, National Institute of Ecology)
Kim, Ilkwon (Bureau of Ecological Research, Division of Ecosystem Services & Research Planning, National Institute of Ecology)
Lee, Jooeun (Bureau of Ecological Research, Division of Ecosystem Services & Research Planning, National Institute of Ecology)
Kwon, Hyuksoo (Bureau of Ecological Research, Division of Ecosystem Services & Research Planning, National Institute of Ecology)
Publication Information
Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment / v.27, no.4, 2018 , pp. 367-377 More about this Journal
Abstract
A cultural ecosystem service(CES), which is non-material benefit that human gains from ecosystem, has been recently further recognized as gross national income increases. Previous researches proposed to quantify the value of CES, which still remains as a challenging issue today due to its social and cultural subjectivity. This study proposes new way of assessing CES which is called Cultural Service Opportunity Spectrum(CSOS). CSOS is accessibility based CES assessment methodology for regional scale and it is designed to be applicable for any regions in Korea for supporting decision making process. CSOS employed public spatial data which are road network and population density map. In addition, the results of 'Rapid Assessment of Natural Assets' implemented by National Institute of Ecology, Korea were used as a complementary data. CSOS was applied to Namyangju-si and the methodology resulted in revealing specific areas with great accessibility to 'Natural Assets' in the region. Based on the results, the advantages and limitations of the methodology were discussed with regard to weighting three main factors and in contrast to Scenic Quality model and Recreation model of InVEST which have been commonly used for assessing CES today due to its convenience today.
Keywords
Cultural Ecosystem Service; Accessibility; Decision making support information; ecosystem service benefits; Natural assets; Public spatial data;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Ala-Hulkko T, Kotavaara O, Alahuhta J, Helle P, Hjort J. 2016. Introducing accessibility analysis in mapping cultural ecosystem services. Ecological indicators 66: 416-427.   DOI
2 Burkhard B, Maes J. 2017. Mapping ecosystem services. Advanced Books 1
3 Chan KM, Guerry AD, Balvanera P, Klain S, Satterfield T, Basurto X, Bostrom A, Chuenpagdee R, Gould R, Halpern BS, Hannahs N. 2012. Where are cultural and social in ecosystem services? A framework for constructive engagement. BioScience 62(8): 744-56.   DOI
4 Gomez-Baggethun E, Barton DN. 2013. Classifying and valuing ecosystem services for urban planning. Ecological Economics 86: 235-245.   DOI
5 Haines-Young R, Potschin MB. 2017. Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES) V5.1 and Guidance on the Application of the Revised Structure.
6 Hansen WG. 1959. How Accessibility Shapes Land Use. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 25(2): 73-76.   DOI
7 Hernández-Morcillo M, Plieninger T, Bieling C. 2013. An empirical review of cultural ecosystem service indicators. Ecological indicators 29: 434-444.   DOI
8 Jensen FS, Koch NE. 1997. Recreation in Forests 1976/77-1993/94 Forskningsserien nr 20. Forskningscentret for Skov& Landskab. Horsholm.
9 Jensen FS. 2003. Recreation in 592 Forests and other Nature Areas Skovbrugsserien nr. 32-2003. Forskningscentret for Skov & Landskab. Horsholm.
10 Kim EY, Kim JY, Jung HJ, Song WK. 2017. Development and Feasibility of Indicators for Ecosystem Service Evaluation. Journal of Environmental Impact Assess. 26(4): 227-241. [Korean Literature]   DOI
11 Korea Culture & Tourism Institute. 2018. Visitors of Main tourist destination 2004-2018. Korea Culture & Tourism Institute. [Korean Literature]
12 Korea National Park Service. 2018. Yearly Visitors to National parks. Korea National Park Service. [Korean Literature]
13 La Rosa D, Spyra M, Inostroza L. 2016. Indicators of Cultural Ecosystem Services for urban planning: A review. Ecological indicators 61: 74-89.   DOI
14 MA(Millenium Ecosystem Assessment). 2005. Ecosystem and human well-being: biodiversity synthesis. World Resources Institute. Washington DC.
15 Nahuelhual L, Carmona A, Aguayo M, Echeverria C. 2014. Land use change and ecosystem services provision: a case study of recreation and ecotourism opportunities in southern Chile. Landscape ecology 29(2): 329-344.   DOI
16 National Institute of Special Education. 2009. Terminologies of special education. [Korean Literature]
17 Natural England. 2011. Monitor of Engagement with the Natural Environment: The National Survey on People and the Natural Environment - Annual Report from the 2010-11 Survey. Natural England Commissioned Report083.
18 National Spatial Data Infrastructure Portal: http://market.nsdi.go.kr/ [Korean Literature]
19 Sievanen T, Neuvonen M. 2011. Working Papers of the Finnish Forest Research Institute 212. Finnish Forest Research Institute.
20 Sen A, Darnell A, Crowe A, Bateman I, Munday P, Foden J. 2011. Economic Assessment of the Recreational Value of Ecosystems Report to the Economics Team of the UK National Ecosystem Assessment. University of East Anglia.
21 Steiner F. 2014. Frontiers in urban ecological design and planning research. Landscape and Urban Planning 125: 304-311.   DOI
22 National Institute of Ecology. 2017. Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystem Services. National Insistute of Ecology. [Korean Literature]