Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14249/eia.2015.24.1.99

A Review on the Public Appeals of the Ecosystem and Nature Map  

Ahn, Kyunghwan (National Institute of Environmental Research)
Shin, Youngkyu (National Institute of Environmental Research)
Kim, Jiyeon (National Institute of Environmental Research)
Lee, Yeoulkyung (Institute of Cham-Ecology)
Lim, Jeongcheol (National Institute of Environmental Research)
Ha, Jeongwook (National Institute of Ecology)
Kwon, Hyuksoo (National Institute of Ecology)
Suh, Jaehwa (National Institute of Environmental Research)
Kim, Myungjin (National Institute of Environmental Research)
Publication Information
Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment / v.24, no.1, 2015 , pp. 99-109 More about this Journal
Abstract
The Ecosystem and Nature Map (ENM) is basic map for current status of natural resources. The map has been offered information to ecological conservation and restoration, as well as to land use planning and policy making. The map composed of 794 sheets in 1:25,000 scale classifies total areas into three grade zones (1st, 2nd and 3rd grade zones) and separately managed zone. In 2005, the first draft Ecosystem and Nature Map was prepared by the second National Ecosystem Survey. It was opened for the people to search and appeal. So 1,419 cases of public appeals on the first draft Ecosystem and Nature Map were submitted in 2005. After partial revision, the first Ecosystem and Nature Map was announced in 2007. The second draft Ecosystem and Nature Map was prepared by the third National Ecosystem Survey and opened to public in 2012. As a result, 1,263 cases of public appeals were submitted in 2012. Since the first announcement of the Ecosystem and Nature Map in April 2007, 182 cases of public appeals on the Map were submitted until December 2013. Among them, 159 cases were announced with revision. According to the first Ecosystem and Nature Map announced in 2007, graded areas covered 7.5% in the 1st grade zone, 39.2% in the 2nd grade zone and 44.7% in the 3rd grade zone of the national land area, respectively. In the second draft Ecosystem and Nature Map in 2012, areas of the 1st grade zone and the 2nd grade zone were 9.2% increased 1.7 percentage points and 45.5% increased 6.3 percentage points, and areas of the 3rd grade zone were 36.6% decreased 8.1 percentage points. Among areas of the 1st grade zone, Gangwondo occupies 54.3% in 2007 and 47.6% in 2012. Gangwondo consists of the highest percentage of the 1st grade zone and the smallest of the 3rd grade zone. Seoul has the highest percentage of the 3rd grade zone. There were the highest increase of the 1st grade zone in Gyeongsangbukdo and the highest decrease in Jeollabukdo and Seoul. Vegetation is the most important evaluation factor to determine the grade of the Ecosystem and Nature Map.
Keywords
Ecosystem and Nature Map; public appeal; National Ecosystem Survey;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 국가법령정보센터. 2014. http://www.law.go.kr (2014, 8.3). (National law information center. 2014. www.law.go.kr (accessed 3 August 2014).)
2 김창회, 강종현, 김명진. 2013. 우리나라 전국자연환경조사 현황과 발전방안. 한국환경영향평가학회지, 22(6), 725-738. (Kim CH, Kang JH, Kim M. 2013. Status and development of the National Ecosystem Survey in Korea. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment, 22(6), 725-738.)   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn
3 노백호, 정흥락, 배수영. 2005. 생태자연도를 이용한 야생 동식물 서식지 관리방안 연구, 한국환경정책평가연구원. (Rho PH, Choung HL, Bae SY. 2005. Habitat management of wildlife by the Ecosystem and Nature Map, Korea Environment Institute.)
4 류상규. 2004. 생태자연도를 활용한 개발가능지 평가: 충주시 사례, 산업과학논문집, 12, 1-12. (Ryu SK. 2004. Developable land assesment using Ecological Map-The case of Chungju, Journal of Industrial Science and Technology, 12, 1-12.)
5 신영철, 민동기. 2005. 생태자연도 1등급지의 경제적 가치 추정, 자원.환경경제연구, 14(1), 25-51. (Shin YC, Min DK. 2005. Estimating the economic value of first-grade Area in Ecological Nature Status, Environmental and Resource Economic Review, 14(1), 25-52.)
6 유팔무. 1998. 비정부사회운동단체(NGO)의 역사와 사회적 역할:시민운동과 정부와의 관계를 중심으로, 동서연구, 10(2), 77-119. (Ryu PM. 1998. The history and social function of nongovernmental social movement organization in recent Korea, Journal of East and Studies, 10(2), 77-119.)
7 이종수. 2007. 국토환경지리정보 고도화 전략 연구-국토환경성평가지도, 생태자연도, 토지피복지도를 중심으로, 환경정책연구, 6(2), 97-122. (Lee JS. 2007. A study on advancing strategy for national environmental geographic informations-Focused on the National Environmental Assessment Map, Ecological Map and Land Cover Map, Journal of Environmental Policy, 6(2), 97-122.)   과학기술학회마을
8 전성우. 2001. 생태자연도 작성 및 활용을 위한 원격 탐사기법 연구(III), 한국환경정책평가연구원. (Joen SW. 2001. Remote sensing technique for mapping and using of the Ecosystem and Nature Map (III), Korea Environment Institute.)
9 전성우, 정휘철. 1999. 생태자연도 작성 및 활용을 위한 원격탐사기법 연구(II), 한국환경정책평가연구원. (Joen SW, Jung HC. 1999. Remote sensing technique for mapping and using of the Ecosystem and Nature Map (II), Korea Environment Institute.)
10 전성우, 정성문. 1998. 생태자연도 작성 및 활용을 위한 원격탐사기법 연구(I), 한국환경정책평가연구원. (Jeon SW, Jeong SM. 1998. Remote sensing technique for mapping and using of the Ecosystem and Nature Map (I), Korea Environment Institute.)
11 전성우, 조정건, 정휘철. 2000. 생태자연도 작성 및 활용을 위한 원격탐사기법 연구(III): 하천주변습지분류도 작성을 중심으로, 환경정책연구, 1-101. (Jeon SW, Joe JG, Jung HC. 2000. Remote sensing technique for mapping and using of the Ecosystem and Nature Map, Journal of Environmental Policy, 18.)
12 정흥락. 2008. 생태.자연도의 정밀도 향상을 위한 현존식생도 제작기법의 개선방안, 환경포럼, 12(4), 1-8. (Choung HL. 2008. Improvement mapping technique of actual vegetation for accuracy enhancement on the Ecosystem and Nature Map. Environmental Forum, 12(4), 1-8.)
13 정흥락, 권영한, 이현우, 송종석, 이규송. 2004. 생태자연도 활용에 있어 식생보전등급 적용 연구, 한국환경정책평가연구원. (Choung HL, Kwun YH, Lee HW, Song JS, Lee KS. 2004. Applying conservation of vegetation value on Ecosystem and Nature Map, Korea Environment Institute.)
14 환경부, 국립환경과학원. 2006. 제3차 전국자연환경조사 지침, 국립환경과학원. (Ministry of Environment, National Institute of Environmental Research. 2006. Guideline of the 3rd National Ecosystem Survey, National Institute of Environmental Research.)
15 USDA-U.S forest service. 2014. www.fs.fed.us (2014.10.1.).
16 환경부. 2014. http://www.me.go.kr (2014.3.5.) (Ministry of Environment. 2014. http://www.me.go.kr (assessed 10 March 2014).)
17 Bundesamt fur naturschutz. 2014. http://www.bfn.de/0311_schutzw_landsch.html(2014.10.1.).