1 |
김명수, 2001, 파편화된 서식처 복원을 위한 기초이론 고찰, 한국환경복원녹화기술학회지, 4, 52-61.
|
2 |
서울특별시, 2010, 2010 도시생태현황도 정비제작 -2차년도-, 서울특별시.
|
3 |
송원경, 2011, 공간그래프 이론을 적용한 삵 서식지 네트워크 모형 개발, 서울대학교 박사학위논문.
|
4 |
안동만, 김명수, 2003, 환경친화적인 도시공원녹지계획 연구 - 생물서식처 연결성 향상을 위한 서울시 녹지조성 방안을 중심으로 -. 한국조경학회지, 31, 34-41.
|
5 |
이동근, 송원경, 2008, 삵의 서식지 적합성 평가를 위한 분석단위 설정 및 보전지역 선정 -충청도 지역을 중심으로, 한국조경학회지, 36, 64-72.
|
6 |
이인성, 윤은주, 2008, 도시녹지 평가를 위한 경관지수의 스케일 민감성 분석, 한국조경학회지, 36, 69-79.
|
7 |
임신재, 손승훈, 김규중, 2011, 활엽수림에 설치한 인공새집을 이용한 박새류 번식 생태, 한국임학회지, 100, 397-401.
|
8 |
정용문, 김선태, 김명수, 2002, 대전시 녹지계획을 위한 연결성 분석에 대한 연구, 한국환경복원녹화기술학회지, 5, 14-23.
|
9 |
Adriaensen, F., 2003, The application of 'leastcost' modelling as a functional landscape model, Landscape and Urban Planning, 64, 233-247.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
10 |
Angold, P.G., Sadler, J.P., Hill, M.O., Pullin, A., Rushton, S., Austin, K., Small, E., Wood, B., Wadsworth, R., Sanderson, R. and Thompson, K., 2006, Biodiversity in urban habitat patches, Sci Total Environ, 360, 196-204.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
11 |
Baguette, M. and Dyck, H., 2007, Landscape connectivity and animal behavior: functional grain as a key determinant for dispersal, Landscape Ecology, 22, 1117-1129.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
12 |
Baranyi, G., Saura, S., Podani, J. and Jordan, F., 2011, Contribution of habitat patches to network connectivity: Redundancy and uniqueness of topological indices, Ecological Indicators, 11, 1301-1310.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
13 |
Belisle, M., 2005, Measuring Landscape Connectivity: The Challenge of Behavioral Landscape Ecology, Ecology, 86, 1988-1995.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
14 |
Benton, T.G., Vickery, J.A. and Wilson, J.D., 2003, Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key? Trends Ecol Evol, 18, 182-188.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
15 |
Broquet, T., Ray, N., Petit, E., Fryxell, J.M. and Burel, F., 2006, Genetic isolation by distance and landscape connectivity in the American marten (Martes americana), Landscape Ecology, 21, 877-889.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
16 |
Bunn, A.G., Urban, D.L. and Keitt, T.H., 2000, Landscape connectivity: A conservation application of graph theory, J Environ Manage, 59, 265-278.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
17 |
CastellOn, T.D. and Sieving, K.E., 2006, An Experimental Test of Matrix Permeability and Corridor Use by an Endemic Understory Bird, Conservation Biology, 20, 135-145.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
18 |
Collinge, S.K. and Forman, R.T.T., 1998, A conceptual model of land conversion processes: predictions and evidence from a microlandscape experiment with grass insects, Oikos, 82, 66-84.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
19 |
Coulon, A., Cosson, J.F., Angibault, J.M., Cargnelutti, B., Galan, M., Morellet, N., Petit, E., Aulagnier, S. and Hewison, A.J., 2004, Landscape connectivity influences gene flow in a roe deer population inhabiting a fragmented landscape: an individual-based approach, Mol Ecol, 13, 2841-50.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
20 |
Desrochers, A., Belisle, M., Morand-Ferron, J. and Bourque, J., 2011, Integrating GIS and homing experiments to study avian movement costs, Landscape Ecology, 26, 47-58.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
21 |
Dingemanse, N.J., Both, C., van Noordwijk, A.J., Rutten, A.L. and Drent, P.J., 2003, Natal dispersal and personalities in great tits (Parus major), Proc Biol Sci, 270, 741-7.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
22 |
Driezen, K., Adriaensen, F., Rondinini, C., Doncaster, C.P. and Matthysen, E., 2007, Evaluating least-cost model predictions with empirical dispersal data: A casestudy using radiotracking data of hedgehogs (Erinaceus europaeus), Ecological Modelling, 209, 314-322.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
23 |
Epps, C.W., Wehausen, J.D., Bleich, V.C., Torres, S.G. and Brashares, J.S., 2007, Optimizing dispersal and corridor models using landscape genetics, Journal of Applied Ecology, 44, 714-724.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
24 |
Fall, A., Fortin, M.-J., Manseau, M. and O'Brien, D., 2007, Spatial Graphs: Principles and Applications for Habitat Connectivity, Ecosystems, 10, 448-461.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
25 |
Forester, J.D., Ives, A.R., Turner, M.G., Anderson, D.P., Fortin, D., Beyer, H.L., Smith, D.W. and Boyce, M.S., 2007, State-space models link elk movement patterns to landscape characteristics in Yellowstone National Park, Ecological Monographs, 77, 285-299.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
26 |
Forman, R.T.T. and Baudry, J., 1984, Hedgerows and hedgerow networks in landscape ecology, Environmental Management, 8, 495-510.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
27 |
Freeman, L.C., 1979, Centrality in Social Networks Conceptual Clarification, Social Networks, 1, 215-239.
|
28 |
Gobeil, J.-F. and Villard, M.-A., 2002, Permeability of three boreal forest landscape types to bird movements as determined from experimental translocations, Oikos, 98, 447-453.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
29 |
Goodwin, B.J., 2003, Is landscape connectivity a dependent or independent variable, Landscape Ecology, 18, 687-699.
DOI
|
30 |
Gurrutxaga, M., Rubio, L. and Saura, S., 2011, Key connectors in protected forest area networks and the impact of highways: A transnational case study from the Cantabrian Range to the Western Alps (SW Europe), Landscape and Urban Planning, 101, 310-320.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
31 |
Gustafson, E.J. and Gardner, R.H., 1996, The Effect of Landscape Heterogeneity on the Probability of Patch Colonization, Ecology, 77, 94-107.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
32 |
Hanski, I., 1998, Metapopulation dynamics, Nature, 396, 41-49.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
33 |
Kindlmann, P. and Burel, F., 2008, Connectivity measures: a review, Landscape Ecology, 23, 879-890.
|
34 |
Hanski, I., 1999, Habitat connectivity, habitat continuity, and metapopulations in dynamic landscapes, Oikos, 87, 209-219.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
35 |
Hanski, I., 2001, Spatially realistic theory of metapopulation ecology. Naturwissenschaften, 88, 372-381.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
36 |
James, P.M.A., Rayfield, B., Fortin, M.-J., Fall, A. and Farley, G., 2005, Reserve network design combining spatial graph theory and species' spatial requirements, Geomatica, 59, 121-129.
|
37 |
Krebs, J.R., N.B. Davies, 1981, An Introduction th Behavioural Ecology, Blackwell Science Inc, USA.
|
38 |
Kusak, J., Huber, D., Gomercie, T., Schwaderer, G. and Guzvica, G., 2008, The permeability of highway in Gorski kotar (Croatia) for large mammals, European Journal of Wildlife Research, 55, 7-21.
|
39 |
LaRue, M.A. and Nielsen, C.K., 2008, Modelling potential dispersal corridors for cougars in midwestern North America using least-cost path methods, Ecological Modelling, 212, 372-381.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
40 |
Levins, R., 1969, Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control, Bull. Entom. Soc. Amer., 15, 237-240.
|
41 |
Lookingbill, T.R., Gardner, R.H., Ferrari, J.R. and Keller, C.E., 2010, Combining a dispersal model with network theory to assess habitat connectivity, Ecological Applications, 20, 427-441.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
42 |
Matthysen, E., Van de Casteele, T. and Adriaensen, F., 2005, Do sibling tits (Parus major, P. caeruleus) disperse over similar distances and in similar directions? Oecologia, 143, 301-7.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
43 |
Merriam, G., 1984, Connectivity: a fundamental ecological characteristic of landscape pattern. - In: Brandt, J. and Agger P. (des), Proceedings of the 1st international seminar on methodology in landscape ecological research and planning, Roskilde Univ., Denmark, pp. 5-15.
|
44 |
Minor, E.S. and Lookingbill, T.R., 2010, A multiscale network analysis of protectedarea connectivity for mammals in the United States, Conserv Biol, 24, 1549-58.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
45 |
O'Brien, D., Manseau, M., Fall, A. and Fortin, M.-J., 2006, Testing the importance of spatial configuration of winter habitat for woodland caribou: An application of graph theory, Biological Conservation, 130, 70-83.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
46 |
Minor, E.S. and Urban, D.L., 2007, Graph theory as a proxy for spatially explicit population models in conservation planning, Ecological Applications, 17, 1771-1782.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
47 |
Moilanen, A. and Hanski, I., 1998, Metapopulation dynamics: Effects of habitat quality and landscape structure, Ecology, 79, 2503-2515.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
48 |
O'Neill, R.V., Krummel, J.R., Gardner, R.H., Sugihara, G., Jackson, B., DeAngelis, D.L., Milne, B.T., Turner, M.G., Zygmunt, B., Christensen, S.W., Dale, V.H. and Graham, R.L., 1988, Indices of landscape pattern, Landscape Ecology, 1, 153-162.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
49 |
Pascual-Hortal, L. and Saura, S., 2008, Integrating landscape connectivity in broad-scale forest plann.ng through a new graph-based habitat availability methodology: application to capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) in Catalonia (NE Spain), European Journal of Forest Research, 127, 23-31.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
50 |
Pither, J. and Taylor, P.D., 1998, An experimental assessment of landscape connectivity, Oikos, 83, 166-174.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
51 |
Pullinger, M.G. and Johnson, C.J., 2010, Maintaining or restoring connectivity of modified landscapes: evaluating the least-cost path model with multiple sources of ecological information, Landscape Ecology, 25, 1547-1560.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
52 |
Ray, N., Lehmann, A. and Loly, P., 2002, Modeling spatial distribution of amphibian populations: A GIS approach based on habitat matrix permeability, Biodiversity and Conservation, 11, 2143-2165.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
53 |
Rayfield, B., Fortin, M.-J. and Fall, A., 2009, The sensitivity of least-cost habitat graphs to relative cost surface values, Landscape Ecology, 25, 519-532.
|
54 |
Ricotta, C., Carranza, M.L., Avena, G. and Blasi, C., 2000, Quantitative comparison of the diversity of landscapes with actual vs. potential natural vegetation, Applied Vegetation Science, 3, 157-162.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
55 |
Saura, S., Vogt, P., Velazquez, J., Hernando, A. and Tejera, R., 2011, Key structural forest connectors can be identified by combining landscape spatial pattern and network analyses, Forest Ecology and Management, 262, 150-160.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
56 |
Ricketts, T.H., 2001, The matrix matters: Effective isolation in fragmented landscapes, The American Naturalist, 158, 87-99.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
57 |
Rustigian, H.L., Santelmann, M.V. and Schumaker, N.H., 2003, Assessing the potential impacts of alternative landscape designs on amphibian population dynamics, Landscape Ecology, 18, 65-81.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
58 |
Saura, S. and Pascual-Hortal, L., 2007, A new habitat availability index to integrate connectivity in landscape conservation planning: Comparison with existing indices and application to a case study, Landscape and Urban Planning, 83, 91-103.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
59 |
Schick, R.S., Loarie, S.R., Colchero, F., Best, B.D., Boustany, A., Conde, D.A., Halpin, P.N., Joppa, L.N., McClellan, C.M. and Clark, J.S., 2008, Understanding movement data and movement processes: current and emerging directions, Ecol Lett, 11, 1338-50.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
60 |
Singleton, P.H., 2001, Using weighted distance and least-cost corridor analysis to evaluate regional-scale large carnivore habitat connectivity in Washington, ICOET, pp. 583-594.
|
61 |
Singleton, P.H., Gaines, W.L. and Lehmkuhl, J.F., 2002, Landscape Permeability for Large Carnivores in Washington: A Geographic Information System Weighted-Distance and Least-Cost Corridor Assessment, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Pacific Northewest Research Station, Portland.
|
62 |
Szulkin, M. and Sheldon, B.C., 2008, Dispersal as a means of inbreeding avoidance in a wild bird population, Proc Biol Sci, 275, 703-11.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
63 |
Taylor, P.D., Fahrig, L., Henein, K. and Merriam, G., 1993, Connectivity is a element of landscape structure, Oikos, 68, 571-573.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
64 |
Tischendorf, L., 2001, Can landscape indices predict ecological processes consistently, Landscape Ecology, 16, 235-254.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
65 |
Tischendorf, L. and Fahrig, L., 2000a, How should we measure landscape connectivity? Landscape Ecology, 15, 633-641.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
66 |
Verbeylen, G., Bruyn, L.D., Adriaensen, F. and Matthysen, E., 2003, Does matrix resistance influence Red squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris L. 1758) distribution in an urban landscape? Landscape Ecology, 18, 791-805.
DOI
|
67 |
Tischendorf, L. and Fahrig, L., 2000b, On the usage and measurement of landscape connectivity, Oikos, 90, 7-19.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
68 |
Turner, M.G., 1989, Landscape ecology: the effect of pattern on process, Annual review of ecology and systematics, 20, 171-197.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
69 |
Urban, D. and Keitt, T., 2001, Landscape connectivity: A graph-theoretic perspective, Ecology, 82, 1205-1218.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
70 |
Verheyen, K., Vellend, M., Calster, H.V., Peterken, G. and Hermy, M., 2004, Metapopulation dynamics in changing landscapes: A new spatially realistic model for forest plants, Ecology, 82, 3302-3312.
|
71 |
Verhulst, S., Perrins, C.M. and Riddington, R., 1997, Natal dispersal of great tits in a patchy environment, Ecology, 78, 864-872.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
72 |
Whitcomb, R.F., Robbins, C.S., Lynch, J.F., Whitcomb, B.L., Klimkiewicz, M.K. and Bystrak, D., 1981, Effects of forest fragmentation on avifauna of the Eastern Deciduous Forest, Springer-Verlag, New York, USA.
|
73 |
Winfree, R., Dushoff, J., Crone, E.E., Schultz, C.B., Budny, R.V., Williams, N.M. and Kremen, C., 2005, Testing Simple Indices of Habitat Proximity, The American Naturalist, 165, 707-717.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
74 |
With, K.A., Gardner, R.H. and Turner, M.G., 1997, Landscape connectivity and population distributions in heterogeneous environments, Oikos, 78, 151-169.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
75 |
Zetterberg, A., Mortberg, U.M. and Balfors, B., 2010, Making graph theory operational for landscape ecological assessments, planning, and design, Landscape and Urban Planning, 95, 181-191.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
76 |
Zozaya, E.L., Brotons, L. and Saura, S., 2011, Recent fire history and connectivity patterns determine bird species distribution dynamics in landscapes dominated by land abandonment, Landscape Ecology, 27, 171-184.
|