Browse > Article

Integrated Approaches of Health Impact Assessment as part of Environmental Assessment in Korea  

Kim, Im-Soon (Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Kwangwoon University)
Park, Joo-Hyun (Kwangwoon Strategic Environmental Assessment Institute, Kwangwoon University)
Han, Sang-Wook (Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Kwangwoon University)
Publication Information
Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment / v.15, no.5, 2006 , pp. 309-322 More about this Journal
Abstract
During the last decade, Health Impact Assessment (HIA) has been discussed worldwide as being an important tool for the development of healthy public policy. HIA has been advanced as a means of bringing potential health impacts to the attention of policy makers, particularly in sectors where health impacts may not otherwise be considered. HIA, a systematic assessment of potential health impacts of proposed public polices, programs, and projects, offers a means to advance population health by bringing public health research to bear on questions of public policy. In Korea, health-related items under current EIA (Environmental Impact Assessment) system can only be found in the categories of hygiene and public health. However, environment and public health are not adequately connected and also health is underestimated even though health is an important objective component for the implementation of Environmental Assessments (EA). As a result, health is not well integrated within criteria for investigating the impacts on environment. This study examines linkages for HIA from the related and relatively well-developed field of Prior Environmental Review System (PERS) which is similar to SEA and EIA in Korea.
Keywords
HIA (Health Impact Assessment); EIA (Environmental Impact Assessment); EA (Environmental Assessment); PERS (Prior Environmental Review System); SEA (Strategic Environmental Assessment);
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 WHO, 1999, Health Impact Assessment: main concepts and suggested approach, Gothenburg consensus paper, 1-11
2 IAIA, 2006, Health Impact Assessment International Best Practice Principles, Special Publications Series No.5, 1-4
3 김임순,한상욱,김혜삼,강선홍,김대권,2006,한 국에서의 EIA와 EMS의 연계방안 연구,환경영향평가학회지,15(3),165-178
4 환경부,2004,환경영향평가서 작성 등에 관한규 정,환경부
5 환경부,2005a,주요 개발 사업에 대한 건강영향 저 감방안,환경부,63, 79-124
6 ATSDR(The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry), 2002, Public Health Assessment Guidance Manual(Update), Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registty Atlanta, Georgia, 1-7
7 EPHIA, 2004, European Policy Health Impact Assessment, 4, 8
8 Health Canada, 2004, Canadian Handbook on Health Impact Assessment: The Basics, Volume 1, 15-20
9 Health Canada, 2004, Canadian Handbook on Health Impact Assessment: Approaches and Decision-Making, Volume 2, 13-14
10 IAIA, 2006, Public Participation International Best Practice Principles, Special Publications Series No.4, 1-3
11 Memorandum of Understanding between the International Association for Impact Assessment and the World Health Organization, 2000, 1-3
12 Rainer Fehr, 1999, Environmental Health Impact Assessment, Evaluation of a Ten-Step Model, UNECE, 2003, Protocol on Strategic Environmental Assessment to the Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context, 1-14
13 The Interorganizational Committee on Principles and Guidelines for Social Impact Assessment, 2003, US principles and guidelines Principles and guidelines for social impact assessment in the USA, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, volume 21, number 3, 231-250   DOI
14 UNEP, 2002, EIA Training Resource Manual. 410-545
15 WHO, 2001, Health Impact Assessment as part of Strategic Environmental Assessment, 10, 14
16 WHO, 2004, European Policy Health Impact Assessment, 4-9
17 환경부,2005b, 환경보건정책 10개년 종합계획 연구,환경부
18 한상욱,2004, 전략환경평가의 현재와 미래: 전략 환경평가의 세계적인 동향과 국내 도입에 따른 시사점,춘계환경영향평가학회 학술발 표기조연설
19 IAIA, 2002, Strategic Environmental Assessment Performance Criteria, Special Publication Series No.1
20 IAIA, 2005, Biodiversity in Impact Assessment, Special Publications Series No.3, 1-4
21 김임순,한상욱,박주현,2006, 유럽연합의 EA에 비춰본 한국의 환경평가제도 개선 방안,환경영향평가학회지,15(2), 139-155
22 IAIA, 2003, International Principles for Social Impact Assessment, Special Publication Series No. 2, 1-8
23 Mahoney M., Durham G., 2002, Health Impact Assessment: a tool for policy development in Australia, report for the Commonwealth Department of Health and Ageing, Deakin University, 27-43
24 김임순,김충곤,강선홍,한상욱,2005, 지속성을 위한 보건영향평가의 국제적인 동향 고찰 및 환경영향평가와의 연계방안 연구,환경영향평가학회지,14(5),1-15
25 Birley, M., 1999, Procedures and Methods for Health Impact Assessment, 11-44
26 IAIA, 2002, The linkages between Impact Assessment and the Sustainable Development Agenda and Recommendations for Actions, 1-12
27 Public Health Commission, 1995, A Guide to Health Impact Assessment, New Zealand, 6-8
28 김임순,김윤신,김대선,서용석,최원욱,한상욱, 2003, 한국에서의 지속성의 구현을 위한 건 강영향평가팀 도입방안,한국EHS평가학회지,1(1), 59-93
29 BMA(British Medical Association), 1994, The Health Impact Assessment of Development projects
30 IAIA, 1999, Principles of Environmental Impact Assessment Best Practice, 1-4
31 UNEP, 2004, Environmental Impact Assessment and Strategic Environmental Assessment: Towards an Integrated Approach, 113-146
32 Health Canada, 2004, Canadian Handbook on Health Impact Assessment: The Multidisciplinary Team, Volume 3, 2728
33 Brian L. Cole, et. al., 2004, Prospects for Health Impact Assessment in the United States: New and Improved Environmental Impact Assessment or Something Different Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, Vol. 29, No. 6
34 Health Canada, 2004, Canadian Handbook on Health Impact Assessment: Health Impacts by Industry Sector, Volume 4, 17-18
35 Mary Mahoney, jenny-Lynn Potter, 2004, Integrating Health Impact Assessment into the Triple Bottom Line Concept, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 24, 151-160   DOI   ScienceOn
36 WHO, 2001, Health Impact Assessment in Development Policy and Planning, Report of an Informal WHO Consultative Meeting, 11-13
37 Council of the European Communities, 2001, Council Directive (200l/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 June 2001 on the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment
38 US DOE, 1993, Recommendations for the Preparation of Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statement. Epidemiology September, Vol. 10, No. 3
39 Asian Development Bank, 1992, Guidelines for Social Analysis of Development Projects, Manila, The Philippines, 3-7
40 김임순,한상욱,2005, 대안적 환경평가시스템 연 구; 통합적 의사결정을 위한 새로운 개념의 영향평가모형 (APEMI IA MODEL)의 국내 적용방안 탐색,환경영향평가학회지,14(4), 3-5
41 Public Health Advisory Committee, 2005, A Guide to Health Impact Assessment: A Policy Tool for New Zealand, 2nd Edition, 3-5
42 UNECE, 2003, Protocol on Strategic Environmental Assessment to the Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context
43 조일형,박재홍,김임순,한상욱,2003,환경영향평 가에 있어서 보건영향평가의 방법,절차 및 적용에 관한 연구,환경영향평가학회지, 12(3), 211-228
44 Council of the European Communities, 1997, Council Directive 97/11/EC of 3 March 1997 amending Directive 85/337/EEC of 27 June 1985 on the Assessment of the Effects of Certain Public and Private Projects on the Environment
45 Larry W., Canter, 1996, Environmental Impact Assessment, Mc. Graw-Hill, 532-534