Browse > Article

A Study on the Alternative Environmental Assessment System in KOREA : Applying New Conceptual Model(APEMI IA MODEL) into Impact Assessment for Better Integrated Decision-Making  

Kim, Im Soon (Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Kwangwoon University)
Han, Sang Wook (Kwangwoon Strategic Environmental Assessment Institute(KWSEAI))
Publication Information
Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment / v.14, no.4, 2005 , pp. 179-193 More about this Journal
Abstract
As the world's attention turns to sustainability and the considerations of cumulative effects, the concept of Strategic Environmental Assessment(SEA) has become more significant and urgent and increasing number of countries and international organizations now undertake some forms of SEA. The term SEA, however, is variously defined and understood; generally it means a formal process of systematic analysis of the environmental effects on development policies, plans, programmes and other proposed strategic actions. This process extends the aims and principles of EIA upstream in the decision-making process, beyond the project level in which major alternatives are still open. There is a shift toward more integrative approaches and greater use of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) as sustainability tools in cooperation with Environmental Management System (EMS). Currently, Korea has EIA system and Prior Environmental Review System (PERS) which is different type of SEA as Environment Assessment (EA) system. APEMI IA MODEL integrated following three pillar(refer to attached figure.1) ; First pillar symbolized decision making cycle with planning process. Second pillar symbolized integrated assessment which tying SEA and EIA with specific impacts assessment(eg: social impact assessment, economic impact assessment, health impact assessment etc) in cooperation with EMS. Third pillar symbolized EA best practical procedure of International Association for Impact Assessment(IAIA). Considering the above, we applied new conceptual model(APEMI IA MODEL) into Impact Assessment for better integrated decision-making in KOREA as an alternative IA system(IS IA MODEL A and B refer to attached figure 4, 5).
Keywords
SEA; EIA; EMS; Sustainable Development; APEMI IA MODEL; IS IA MODEL(A, B);
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 World Bank, 2002, Strategic Environmental Assessment in world Bank Operations; Experience to Date-Future Potential, 1-51
2 Lawrence B. Cahill, 2001, Environmental Health and Safety Audits 8th Edition, Government Institutes Rockville, Maryland. 89-127
3 The NEPA TASK FORCE, 2003, Modernizing NEPA Implementationon the Council on Environmental Quality, Executive office of president of the United States, 7-18
4 U.S. Institute for Environmental Conflict Resolution, 2001, Report and Recommendation on a NEPA Pilot Project Initiative, 1-10
5 UNEP, 2004, Environmental Impact Assessment and Strategic Environmental Assessment: Towards an Integrated Approach, 1-147
6 한국개발연구원, 1999, 예비타당성 조사수행을 위한 일반지침 연구, 1-22
7 IAIA, 1999, Principes of Environmental Impact Assessment Best Practice, 1-4
8 Bjorn Lomborg, 2004, Global Crises, Global Solutions, Cambridge University Press. 129-150
9 U.S. Institute for Environmental Conflict Resolution, 2004, Final Report Online Dialogue on Conflict Situation Assessment, 5-9
10 한상욱, 2004, 새로운 환경평가 패러다임과 우리의 대응, 2004년도 한국 환경영향평가학회 추계학술발표회자료집
11 WHO (2001), Health Impact Assessment in Development Policy and Planing, Report of an Informal WHO Consultative Meeting, Cartagena, Colombia 28 May, 2001, 5-23
12 Annie Donnelly 1998, A Directory of Impact Assessment Guidelines, International Institute for Environmental and Development. 31-42
13 김임순외, 2004a, 전략환경평가를 통한환경영향 평가의 개선방안에 관한 연구: 대안적 환경 평가 모형 APEMI IA MODEL의 제안, 환경정책 12(2), 81-110
14 Fondawione Enrico Mattei, 2002, Toward An Analytical Strategic Environmental Assessment-ANSEA Towards Better Decision-Making New Concepts in Strategic Environmental Assessment
15 김은식, 한상욱, 2001, 국책개발사업(새만금 간척사업개발)과 환경영향평가 : 공공사업 추진절차의 재정립과 전략환경평가 제도 도입, 한국환경영향평가학회 학술대회 발표 자료집, 3-24
16 서원상, 2004, 지속적 개발의 '지속성' 개념에 관한 법학적 접근, 환경정책연구 3(2) 통권5호, 82-83
17 EC, 2003a, Commissions Guidance on the Implementation of Directive 2001/42/EC on the Assessment of the Effects of Certain and Plans and Programmes on the Environment, 1-63
18 U.S. CEQ, 1997, 'The National Environmental Policy Act: A Study of Its Effectiveness After Twenty Five Years, 1-47
19 한상욱, 2003, 전략적 환경평가 -현재와 미래-, 2003년도 한국환경정책학회 정기총회 및 학술대회자료집, 9-49
20 국무조정실, 2004, 국책사업타당성 조사제도개선방안, 1-12
21 환경부홈페이지, www.me.go.kr
22 IAIA, 2002a, Strategic Environmental Assessment, Performance Criteria, Special Publication 1, 1
23 WHO, 2002, The World Summit on Sustainable Development Report by the Secretariat, Fifty-Fifth World Health Assembly Provisional Agenda Item 13.3
24 CSIR, 2000, Strategic Environmental Assessment in South Africa. 1-36
25 감사원, 2003, 경인운하건설사업 추진실태, 1-6
26 정연만, 2003, 환경영향평가제도의 발전방향, 한국영향평가학회 2003년 추계학술 발표회 자료집, 39-46
27 Christopher Wood, 1995, Environmental Impact Assessment A Comparative Review. LONGMAM. 266-288
28 EnvironmentCanada, 2003, Strategic Environmental Assessment at Environment Canada
29 IAIA, 2002b, The Linkages Between Impact Assessment and the Sustainable Development Agenda, and Recommendations for Actions, 1-12
30 Larry Canter, Barry Sadler, 1997, A Tool kit for effective eia practice-Review of Methods and Perspectives on their Application. IAIA. 5-40
31 Ministry of the Environment, Japan, 2003, Effective SEA System and Case Studies, 2-37
32 UN, 2005, UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs Division for Sustainable Development http://www.un.org/esa/ sustdev/natlinfo/indicators/isd.htm
33 UNDP, 2003, Benefits of a Strategic Environmental Assessment, 1-5
34 Barry Dalal-Clayton and Barry Sadler, 2004, The Status and Potential of Strategic Environmental Assessment, 1-112
35 Boelie Elzen Frank W. Geels Ken Green, 2004. System Innovation and the Transition to Sustainability Theory, Evidence and Policy, 1-47
36 ICON, 2001, SEA and International of the Environment into Strategic Decision Making Final Report, 1
37 The Government of the HongKong, 2004, HongKong Strategic Environmental Assesment Manual, 25-66
38 UNEP, 2002, EIA Training Resource Manual, 410-545
39 건설교통부, 2005, 국토업무편람, 289-293
40 한상욱, 1999, 지속가능한 개발과 전략환경평가, 지속가능개발위원회설치 운영에 관한 토론회, 서울특별시녹색 서울시민위원회
41 EC, 2003b, How successful are the Member States in implementing the EIA Directive, Adoption of the 5 Years Report on the application and Effectiveness of the EIA Directive(Directive 85/337/EEC as amended by Directive 97/11/EC)
42 L. J. Walker and J Johnston, 1999, Guidelines for the Assessment of Indirect and Cumulative Impacts as well as Impact Interactions, Hyder, 2-14
43 Barry Sadler, 1997, International Study of the Effectiveness of Environmental Assessment. Final Report Environmental Assessment in a Changing World: Evaluating Practice to Improve Performance, CEAA, IAIA, 1996, 139-182
44 김임순 외, 2004b , 전략환경평가를 통한 환경영향 평가의 개선방안에 관한 연구 보건영향평가 제도 도입을 통한 보건과 환경의 통합적 접근, 대한위생학회 19(4), 34-47