1 |
Damigos, D. and Kaliampakos, D., 2003, Assessing the benefits of reclaiming urban quarries: a CVM analysis, Landscape and Urban Planning, 64, 249-258
DOI
ScienceOn
|
2 |
홍성표, 김정흠, 1996, 조건부가치측정법에 의한 대기환경의 경제적 가치평가, 충남대학교 경영경제연구소 경제논총, 12, 65-75
|
3 |
Piper, S. and Martin, W.E., 2001, Evaluating the ccuracy of the benefit transfer method: A rural water supply application in the USA, Journal of Environmental Management, 63, 223-235
DOI
ScienceOn
|
4 |
Kawabe, M. and Oka, T., 1996, Benefit fromimprovement of organic contamination ofTokyo bay, Marine Pollution Bulletin, 32(11),788-793
DOI
ScienceOn
|
5 |
황영순, 엄미정, 김태유, 1999, 수돗물 공급신뢰도 개선의 가치측정, 환경경제연구, 8(1), 109-126
PUBMED
|
6 |
엄영숙, 2001, 만경강 수질개선 편익측정을 위한 조건부가치평가에 있어서 범위효과 분석, 자원·환경경제연구, 10(3), 387-412
|
7 |
유승훈, 김태유, 1999, 조건부가치측정법을 이용한 서울시 오존오염 저감정책의 편익분석, 한국정책학회보, 8(3), 191-211
|
8 |
장태구, 1997, 임의가치법(CVM)을 이용한 환경재의 가치평가 : 낙동강의 편익 산출을 중심으로, 한국지역개발학회지, 9(1), 55-69
|
9 |
Brauer, I., 2003, Money as an indicator: to make use of economic evaluation for biodiversity conservation, Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 98, 483-491
DOI
ScienceOn
|
10 |
Christie, M., 2001, A comparison of alternative contingent valuation elicitation treatments for the evaluation of complex environmental policy, Journal of Environmental Management, 62, 255-269
DOI
PUBMED
ScienceOn
|
11 |
Koss, P. and Khawaja, M.S., 2001, The value of water supply reliability in California: a contingent valuation study, Water Policy, 3, 165-174
DOI
ScienceOn
|
12 |
Turpie, J.K., 2003, The existence value of biodiversity in South Africa: how interest, experience, knowledge, income and perceived level of treat influence local willingness to pay, Ecological Economics, 46, 199~216
DOI
ScienceOn
|
13 |
Margai, F.L., 1995, Evaluating the potential for environmental quality improvement in a community distressed by manmade hazards, Journal of Environmental Management, 44, 181-190
DOI
ScienceOn
|
14 |
Roomratanapun, W., 2001, Introducing centralised wastewater treatment in Bangkok: a study of factors determining its acceptability, Habit International, 25, 359-371
DOI
ScienceOn
|
15 |
Willis, K.G. and Garrod, G.D., 1998, Watercompanies and river environments: the external costs of water abstraction, Utilities Policy, 7, 35-45
DOI
ScienceOn
|
16 |
Stenger, A. and Willinger, M., 1998, Preservation value for groundwater quality in a large aquifer: a contingent-valuation study of the Alsatian aquifer, Journal of Environmental Management, 53, 177-193
DOI
ScienceOn
|
17 |
김종대, 이동수, 조문기, 2002, 조건부가치측정법 (CVM)에 의한 지불의사액(WTP)의 추정, 충북대학교 산업과 경영, 15(1), 173-191
|
18 |
김광임, 민동기, 정회성, 염현정, 김미숙, 1999, 수질오염의 사회적 비용 계량화 연구 : 한강수계를 중심으로, 한국환경정책·평가연구원
|
19 |
신영철, 1997, 이중양분선택형 질문 CVM을 이용한 한강 수질개선 편익 측정, 환경경제연구, 6(1), 171-192
|
20 |
곽승준, 유승훈, 김찬준, 2002, 농촌폐비닐의 재활용확대정책에 대한 경제적 편익측정, 한국재정·공공경제학회 정책논총, 17(1), 23-45
|