Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14369/skmc.2016.29.4.061

A Study on Suwenliuqixuanzhumiyu  

Yun, Chang-yeol (Dept. of Medical Classics, College of Korean Medicine, Deajeon University)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Medical classics / v.29, no.4, 2016 , pp. 61-73 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objectives : Suwenliuqixuanzhumiyu is a book that strongly influenced the following generations' theory of five Circuits and six Qi. It is understood that Wangbing authored the book during the Tang dynasty, but another theory suggests that a nameless author devised the book falsely in Wangbing's name. A comprehensive research is greatly significant in the development of the theory of five Circuits and six Qi. Methods : The study will focus on the analysis on the truth about Suwenliuqixuanzhumiyu, its impact on the following generations' theory of five Circuits and six Qi, the contents and comparison of Suwen's xuanzhumiyu, and the 17 books and 27 chapters of xuanzhumiyu. Results & Conclusions : First, xuanzhu was authored by Wangbing sometime around 762 AD, and Suwenliuqixuanzhumiyu was written in 690 during the rule of Empress Wu Zetian, meaning that Wangbing is not the author of Suwenliuqixuanzhumiyu. Second, Wangbing's style of writing is regular yet elegant, and keeps itself within the range of medical style of writing, but Suwenliuqixuanzhumiyu is written in a very rough style, and finds itself within the range of Tao literatures and books on trickery. Third, Wangbing's xuanzhu is a commentary on Suwen, whereas Suwenliuqixuanzhumiyu is consisting of the theory of five Circuits and six Qi, and trickeries predictive picture. As such, the two books have entirely different characters. Theories that received relatively significant impacts to the following generations' the theory of five Circuits and six Qi include Gandeokbu, Jeongwhadaewha, and the Calculation method of normal Qi. Suwen's chapter on the theory of five Circuits and six Qi and Suwenliuqixuanzhumiyu have many inconsistent and differing theories, leading the scholars to believe that they are dealing with different theory of five Circuits and six Qi which derived from separate schools of beliefs.
Keywords
Wangbing; Xuanzhu; Suwenliuqixuanzhumiyu; Five Circuits and six Qi; Gandeokbu;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Gwak AC. Hwangjenaegyeong Somun Gyoju(1). Beijing. People′s Medical Publishing House. 1992. 郭靄春 主編. 黃帝內經素問校注(上). 北京. 人民衛生出版社. 1992.
2 Yeong Y ed.. Sagojeonseochongmok(1). Beijing. Chung Hwa Book Co. 1995. 永瑢 撰. 四庫全書總目(上冊). 北京. 中華書局. 1995.
3 Eom SU ed.. Zhongguo yiji tongkao. Seoul. Uiseongdang. 1993. 嚴世芸 編著. 中國醫籍通考. 서울. 醫聖堂. 1993.
4 Yu OS original work. Chang RP ed.. Somunungirono. Beijing. Xueyuanchubanshe. 2008. 劉溫舒 原著. 張立平 校注. 素問運氣論奧. 北京. 學苑出版社. 2008.
5 Chang GB. Yugyeongdoik. Seoul. Seongbosa. 1982. 張介賓. 類經圖翼. 서울. 成輔社. 1982.
6 Tal T ed.. History Song Dynasty(15). Beijing. Chung Hwa Book Co. 1990. 脫脫 撰. 宋史(15). 北京. 中華書局. 1990.
7 So Y, Seop GN. A Study on Hyeonjumileo an infectious disease. Chinese Journal of Basic Medicine in Traditional Chinese Medicine. 2012. 18(10). 蘇穎, 聶金娜. 玄珠密語疫理鉤玄. 中國中醫基礎醫學雜志. 2012. 18(10).
8 Chang DB. A Study on Wang Bing and Hyeonjumileo Contents. Chinese Archives of Traditional Chinese Medicine. 2005. 23(4). 張登本. 王冰與玄珠密語源流考. 中醫藥學刊. 2005. 23(4).
9 Hyeong RY. The Spreading Process of The Editions of Suwen Liuqi Xuanzhumiyu And Dispute over Whether It Is The Work Xuanzhu by Wang Bing or Not. Chinese Archives of Traditional Chinese Medicine. 2010. 28(10). 荊麗娟. 素問六氣玄珠密語版本流傳情况及與王冰玄珠眞僞辨疑. 中華中醫藥學刊. 2010. 28(10).