Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14369/skmc.2015.28.2.147

A Study on the Meaning of Splenic Constipation Syndrome(脾約證) in Shanghanlun(傷寒論)  

Ahn, Jin-Hee (Dept. of Korean Medicine, Graduate School, Kyunghee University)
Jeong, Chang-Hyun (Dept. of Korean Medical Classics, College of Korean Medicine, Kyunghee University)
Jang, Woo-Chang (Dept. of Korean Medical Classics, College of Korean Medicine, Kyunghee University)
Baik, You-Sang (Dept. of Korean Medical Classics, College of Korean Medicine, Kyunghee University)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Medical classics / v.28, no.2, 2015 , pp. 147-162 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objectives : The purpose of this study is to investigate splenic constipation syndrome(脾約證) in Shanghanlun by comparing 179 & 247 provisions. Methods : Including Shanghanlun, several texts which contain Cheng Wu-ji, Wan Mi-zhai, Qian Huang, Zhu Gong, Fang You-zhi, Yu Jia-yan, Zhang Lu, Cheng Ying-mao, Zhang Xi-ju, Chen Xiu-yuan, Wu Qian, Xu Ling-tai, You Zai-jing, Zhu Dan-xi's opinion about the splenic constipation syndrome were chosen and comparative consideration was carried out. Results & Conclusions : The following conclusions could be drawn. 247 provisions in Shanghanlun is different from 179 provisions because the beginning of the each splenic constipation syndrome is different. The difference between 179 & 247 provisions are proved by comparing Mild Purgative Decoction which is used Taiyangyangming splenic constipation syndrome and Fructus Cannabis Pill which is used Dorsal pedal pulse splenic constipation syndrome. Cheng Wu-ji's opinion that 179 & 247 provisions is different is meaningful because he is first investigated the different beginning of the splenic constipation syndrome. Several annotator's opinion which oppose Cheng Wu-ji is majority and they set a high value on Jangbu(臟腑) factor. Several annotator's opinion which agree Cheng Wu-ji is minority and they set a high value on splenic constipation syndrome also begins from Taiyangbing. The concept of overlapping of Taiyangyangming is different from the concept of Taiyangyangming. Consequently 179 & 247 provisions has to be distinguished.
Keywords
Shanghanlun(傷寒論); Taiyangyangming(太陽陽明); Splenic Constipation(脾約); Fructus Cannabis Pill(麻子仁丸);
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 You ZJ. Shanghanguanzhuji. Beijing. Zhongguozhongyiyaochubanshe. 1999. p.49, 61. 尤在涇. 傷寒貫珠集(尤在涇醫學全書). 北京. 中國中醫葯出版社. 1999. p.49, 61.
2 Wan Quan. Shanghanzhaijin. Beijing. Zhongguozhongyiyaochubanshe. 1999. p.263, 269. 萬全. 傷寒摘錦(萬密齋醫學全書). 北京. 中國中醫葯出版社. 1999. p.263, 269.
3 Qian Huang. Chongbianzhangzhongjingshanghanlunzheng zhifamingsuyuanji. Shanghai. Shanghaigujichubanshe. 2002. p.19. pp.13-14. 錢潢. 重編張仲景傷寒論證治發明溯源集(續修四庫全書 987 子部.醫家類). 上海. 上海古籍出版社. 2002. p.19. pp.13-14.
4 Compiled by Nie HM, Wang QG, Gao Fei. Shanghanlunjijie. Beijing. Xueyuanchubanshe. 2001. pp.302-305, 610-612, 616-618, 720-721. 聶惠民, 王慶國, 高飛 編集. 傷寒論集解. 北京. 學苑出版社. 2001. pp.302-305, 610-612, 616-618, 720-721.
5 Written by Liu DZ, Translated by Jeong CH and Kim HI. Liuduzhoushanghanlunjiangyi. Paju. Fishwood. 2014. p.419. 류두저우 지음, 정창현, 김혜일 옮김. 劉渡舟傷寒論講義. 파주. 물고기숲. 2014. p.419.
6 Zhu DX. Gezhiyulun. Seoul. Daeseongmunhwasa. 1995. p.659. 朱丹溪. 格致餘論(欽定四庫全書 14 子部 醫家類). 서울. 대성문화사. 1995. p.659.
7 Liu LJ. Analysis on the splenic constipation and Fructus Cannabis Pill syndrome and treatment. Xiaxizhongyixueyuanxuebao. 2011. 34(2). pp.69-70. 劉麗軍. 脾約與麻子仁丸證治辨析. 陜西中醫學院學報. 2011. 34(2). pp.69-70.
8 Xiao XR. Splenic constipation is not Fructus Cannabis Pill syndrome. Henanzhongyi. 2009. 29(11). pp.1044-1045. 肖相如. 脾約不是麻子仁丸證. 河南中醫. 2009. 29(11). pp.1044-1045.
9 Compiled by Li SB. Shanghanlunbanbendaquan. Beijing. Xueyuanchubanshe. 2001. p.178. 李順保 編著. 傷寒論版本大全. 北京. 學苑出版社. 2001. p.178.
10 Compiled by Moon JJ et al. Interpretation of Shanghanlun. Seoul. Publisher of Kyunghee Univ. 1996. p.104, 138, 247, 375, 487, 492, 493, 495. pp.138-142, 379-381, 385-387, 487-489. 文濬典 外 6人. 傷寒論精解. 서울. 慶熙大學校出版局. 1996. p.104, 138, 247, 375, 487, 492, 493, 495. pp.138-142, 379-381, 385-387, 487-489.
11 Cheng WJ. Shanghanminglilun. Beijing. Zhongguozhongyiyaochubanshe. 2005. p.107, 191. 成無己. 傷寒明理論(成無己醫學全書). 北京. 中國中醫藥出版社. 2005. p.107, 191.
12 Cheng WJ. Zhujieshanghanlun. Beijing. Zhongguozhongyiyaochubanshe. 2005. p.103, 113. 成無己. 注解傷寒論(成無己醫學全書). 北京. 中國中醫藥出版社. 2005. p.103, 113.
13 Compiled by He Ren. Jinguiyaoluejiaozhu. Beijing. Renminweishengchubanshe. 1990. p.115. 何任 主編. 金匱要略校注. 北京. 人民衛生出版社. 1990. p.115.
14 Yu JY. Shanglunpian. Beijing. Zhongguozhongyiyaochubanshe. 1999. p.64, 67. pp.67-68. 喩嘉言. 尙論篇(喩嘉言醫學全書). 北京. 中國中醫藥出版社. 1999. p.64, 67. pp.67-68.
15 Zhu Gong. Zengzhuleizhenghuorenshu. Seoul. Namsandang. 1987. p.72, 112. 朱肱 撰. 增注類證活人書. 서울. 南山堂. 1987. p.72, 112.
16 Fang YZ. Shanghanluntiaobian. Seoul. Daeseongmunhwasa. 1995. p.57. 方有執. 傷寒論條辨(欽定四庫全書 43 子部 醫家類). 서울. 대성문화사. 1995. p.57.
17 Zhang Lu. Shanghanzuanlun. Beijing. Zhongguozhongyiyaochubanshe. 1999. p.579, 583. 張璐. 傷寒纘論(張璐醫學全書). 北京. 中國中醫藥出版社. 1999. p.579, 583.
18 Cheng YM. Shanghanlunhoutiaobian. Shanghai. Shanghaigujichubanshe. 2002. p.416, 432. 程應旄. 傷寒論後條辨(續修四庫全書 986 子部.醫家類). 上海. 上海古籍出版社. 2002. p.416, 432.
19 Zhang XJ. Shanghanlunzhijie. Shanghai. Shanghaigujichubanshe. 2002. p.238, 251. 張錫駒. 傷寒論直解(續修四庫全書 987 子部. 醫家類). 上海. 上海古籍出版社. 2002. p.238, 251.
20 Chen XY. Shanghanlunqianzhu. Beijing. Zhongguozhongyiyaochubanshe. 2001. p.423, 434. 陳修園. 傷寒論淺注(陳修園醫學全書). 北京. 中國中醫藥出版社. 2001. p.423, 434.
21 Wu Qian. Dingzhengshanghanlunzhu. Beijing. Renminweishengchubanshe. 1982. p.120, 132. 吳謙 編. 訂正傷寒論注(醫宗金鑑). 北京. 人民衛生出版社. 1982. p.120, 132.
22 Xu LT. Shanghanleifang. Beijing. Zhongguozhongyiyaochubanshe. 1999. p.188. 徐靈胎. 傷寒類方(徐靈胎醫學全書). 北京. 中國中醫葯出版社. 1999. p.188.