Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14578/jkfs.2013.102.4.537

Comparison of Physiological Characteristics, Stomata and DNA Content between Seedling and 5-year-old Somatic Plant (Somatic Embryo Derived-plant) in Liriodendron tulipifera  

Kim, Yong Wook (Division of Forest Biotechnology, Korea Forest Research Institute)
Moon, Heung Kyu (Division of Forest Biotechnology, Korea Forest Research Institute)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Society of Forest Science / v.102, no.4, 2013 , pp. 537-542 More about this Journal
Abstract
Field performance of somatic plants (somatic embryo derived-plants) of yellow-poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera) produced from somatic embryogenesis was compared with that of seedlings at age 5. In comparison of photosynthetic rate (seedling, $10.67{\mu}mol$ $CO_2m^{-2}s^{-1}$; somatic plant, $9.04{\mu}mol$ $CO_2m^{-2}s^{-1}$), stomatal conductance rate (seedling, 0.2 $H_2Om^{-2}s^{-1}$; somatic plant, 0.166 $H_2Om^{-2}s^{-1}$) and respiration rate (seedling, 1.71 mmol $H_2Om^{-2}s^{-1}$; somatic plant, 1.513 mmol $H_2Om^{-2}s^{-1}$), no significant differences were found between plants. The seedlings were a little higher in comparison of stomatal density (seedling, $23.33/mm^2$; somatic plant, $22.43/mm^2$), length (seedling, $25.83{\mu}m$; somatic plant, $23.46{\mu}m$) and width (seedling, $15.87{\mu}m$; somatic plant, $15.3{\mu}m$). In comparison of DNA content of the leaves using flow cytometry, no differences in ploidy level were found between the seedlings and somatic plants.
Keywords
flow cytometry; photosynthetic rate; seedling; somatic plant; stomata; yellow poplar;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Ryu, K.O., Kim, W.J., Kim, I.S., Choi, H.S., Lee, D.H., and Kim, Y.W. 2008a. Yellow Poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera)-Growth characteristics and Usage techniques. Korea Research Forest Institute Research Bulletin 320: 110-136.
2 Son, S.G., Moon, H.K., Kim, Y.W. and Kim, J.A. 2005. Effect of mother trees and dark culture condition affecting on somatic embryogenesis of Liriodendron tulipifera L. Journal of Korean Forest Society 94: 39-44.   과학기술학회마을
3 Tremblay, L., Levasseur, C. and Tremblay, F.M. 1999. Frequency of somaclonal variation in plants of black spruce (Picea mariana, Pinaceae) and white spruce (P. glauca, Pinaceae) derived from somatic embryogenesis and identification of some factors involved in genetic instability. American Journal Botany 86: 1373-1381.   DOI
4 Valladares, S., Sanchez, C., Martinez, M.T., Ballester, A. and Vieitez, A.M. 2005. Plant regeneration through somatic embryogenesis from tissues of mature oak trees; true-totype conformity of plantlets by RAPD analysis. Plant Cell Reports 25: 879-886.
5 Borechert, T., Fuchs, J., Winkelmann, T., and Hohe A. 2007. Variable DNA content of Cyclamen pericum regenerated via soamtic embryogenesis: rethinking the concept of long-term callus and suspension cultures. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 90: 255-263.   DOI
6 Dai, J., Vendrame, W.A., and Merkle, S.A. 2004. Enhancing the productivity of hybrid yellow-poplar and hybrid sweetgum embryogenic cultures. In Vitro Cellular Developmental Biology-Plant 40: 376-383.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Endemann, M., Hristofroglu, K., Stauber, T., and Wilhelm, E. 2001. Assessment of age-related polyploid in Quercus robur L. somatic embryos and regenerated plants using DNA flow cyometry. Biologia Plantarum 44: 339-345.   DOI
8 Greenwood, M.S., Hopper, C.A., and Hutchison, K.W. 1989. Maturation in larch. I. Effect of age on shoot growth, foliar characteristic in larch, and DNA methylation. Plant Physiolgy 90: 406-412.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Grossnickle, S.C. and Major, J.E. 1994. Interior spruce seedlings compared with emblings produced from somatic embryogenesis. II. Stock quality assessment prior to field planting. Canadian Journal Forest Reserach 24: 1385-1396.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Grossnickle, S.C. and Fan, S. 1998. Genetic variation in summer gas exchange patterns of interior spruce (Picea glauca (Moench Voss ${\time}$ Picea engelmannii Parry ex Engelm). Canadian Journal Forest Reserach 28: 831-840.   DOI
11 Isabel, N., Tremblay, L., Michaud, M., Tremblay, F.M., and Bousquet, J. 1993. RAPDs as an aid to evaluate the genetic integrity of somatic embryogenesis-derived populations of Picea mariana (Mill.) B.S.P. Theological Applied Genetics 86: 81-87.
12 Joshi, P., Joshi, N., and Purohit, S.D. 2006. Stomatal characteristics during micropropagation of Wrightia tomentosa. Biologia Plantarum 50: 275-278.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Kim, Y.W., Han, M.S., Moon, H.K. and Park, S.Y. 2011. Effects of ABA, reduced nitrogen source and osmoticum for somatic embryogenesis in Liriodendron tulipifera. Korean Journal of Plant Biotechnology 38: 186-190.   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Kim, Y.W., Kim, J.C., Youn, Y., Moon, H.K., and Lee, J.S. 2002. Morphological and physiological characteristics of emblings derived from somatic embryos, seedlings, and mature trees in Larix leptolepis. Journal of Korean Forest Society 99: 623-637.
15 Kim, Y.W. and Moon, H.K. 2012. Comparison of growth characteristics between 5-year-old emblings derived form somatic embryos and seedlings in Liriodendron tulipifera. Journal of Korean Forest Society 101: 613-618.
16 Lamhamedi, M.S., Chamberland, H., Bernier, P.Y., and Tremblay, F.M. 2000. Clonal variation in morphology, growth, physiology, anatomy and ultrastructure of container-grown white spruce somatic plants. Tree Physiology 20: 869-880.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Lee, J.S., Moon, H.K., and Kim Y.W. 2003. Mass propagation of Liriodendron tulipifera L. via somatic embryogenesis. Korean Journal of Plant Biotechnology 30: 359-363.   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Merkle, S.A. and Sommer, H.E. 1986. Somatic embryogenesis in tissue cultures of Liriodendron tulipifera. Canadian Journal Forest Reserach 16: 420-422.   DOI
19 Lee, S.H., Tewari, R.K., Hahn, E.J., and Paek K.Y. 2007. Phuton flux density and light quality induce changes in growth, stomatal development, photosynthesis and transpiration of Withania Somnifera (L.) Dunal. plantlets. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 90: 141-151.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Menendez-Yuffa, A., Barry-Etienne, D., Bertrand, B., Georget, F., and Etienne, H. 2010. A comparative analysis of the development and quality of nursery plants derived from somatic embryogenesis and from seedlings for large-scale propagation of coffee (Coffea arabica L.). Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 102: 297-307.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Merkle, S.A., Sotak, R.J., Wieeko, A.T., and Dommer H.E. 1990. Maturation and conversion of Liriodendron tulipifera somatic embryos. In Vitro Cellular Developmental Biology-Plant 26: 1086-1093.   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Murashige, T. and Skoog, F. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays tobacco tissue cultures. Physiologia Plantarum 15: 473-497.   DOI
23 Nsangou, M. and Greenwood, M. 1998. Physiological and morphological differences between somatic, in vitro germinated, and normal seedlings of red spruce (Picea rubens Sarg.). Canadian Journal Forest Reserach 28: 1088-1092.   DOI
24 O'Neill, GA., Russell, J.H., Hooge, B.D., Ott, P.K., and Hawkins C.B.D. 2005. Estimating gains from genetic tests of somatic emblings of interior spruce. Forest Genetics 12: 57-66.
25 Ryu, K.O., Kim, W.J., Kim, I.S., Choi, H.S., Lee, D.H., and Kim Y.W. 2008a. Yellow Poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera)-Growth characteristics and Usage techniques. Korea Research Forest Institute Research Bulletin 320: 19-33.