Browse > Article

Soil Physical-chemical Characteristics on Indigenous Plant and Naturalized Plant of Coastal Sand Dune on Central-western Coastal Area, Korea  

Kim, Chan-Beom (Division of Forest Disaster Management, Korea Forest Research Institute)
Son, Yowhan (Division of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Korea University)
Bae, Yeong-Tae (Division of Forest Disaster Management, Korea Forest Research Institute)
Park, Ki-Hyung (Division of Forest Disaster Management, Korea Forest Research Institute)
Youn, Ho-Joong (Division of Forest Disaster Management, Korea Forest Research Institute)
Kim, Kyongha (Division of Forest Disaster Management, Korea Forest Research Institute)
Lee, Chang-Woo (Division of Forest Disaster Management, Korea Forest Research Institute)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Society of Forest Science / v.102, no.3, 2013 , pp. 323-330 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study was conducted to know the effect of major physical-chemical characteristics of soil to be in the area of indigenous and naturalized plant in the sand dune of the western coastal area of Korea. The study was performed on the sand dunes distributed across Taean-gun and Buan-gun and the study period was from April to October in 2010. Sixty nine of $5m{\times}5m$ study plots were installed and the distribution of plants were investigated. We measured the soil characteristics including soil pH, organic matter, total nitrogen, available $P_2O_5$, soil cation exchange capacity, exchangeable cation, EC and NaCl. As a result, soil texture was classified as sand, in case of average pH, NaCl, and EC of soil to be in the area of indigenous herbaceous plant were 7.77, 0.03% and $0.52ds.m^{-1}$, indigenous woody plant of the mean pH, NaCl and EC were 7.31, 0.01%, $0.23ds.m^{-1}$. In case of naturalized herbaceous plant of the mean soil pH, NaCl and EC were 7.12, 0.01%, $0.29ds.m^{-1}$, naturalized woody plant of the mean soil pH, NaCl and EC were 7.34, 0.01%, $0.20ds.m^{-1}$ respectively. On average, naturalize plants showed in low salinity concentration than indigenous plants.
Keywords
sand fixation; salt tolerant plant; restoration; coastal ecosystem; vegetation zone;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 김준민, 임양재, 전의식. 2000. 한국의 귀화식물. 사이언스북스. pp. 281.
2 강병화, 김태완, 심상인, 홍선희, 김건옥, 이용호, 나채선. 2009. 자원식물학 -야생식물과 재배식물-. 향문사, pp. 530.
3 고강석, 강인구, 서민환, 김정현, 김기대, 길지현, 전의식, 이유미. 한국에서의 귀화식물 분포. 1997. 한국생물상연구지 12: 139-164.
4 기상청. 2010. 기후연보. 기상청, pp 311.
5 김종원, 이율경. 2006. 식물사회학적 식생 조사와 평가방법. 월드사이언스. pp. 240.
6 류태복. 2012. 한국 귀화식물상의 생태분류. 계명대학교 석사학위논문. pp. 131.
7 김종원, 정용규. 1995. 김포 매립지와 그 근린 지역의 식물상 분석. 한국생태학회지 18: 31-41.
8 김하송, 오장근. 2010. 다도해 해상국립공원의 귀화식물분포 특성. 한국자원식물학회지 23(2): 187-196.
9 농촌진흥청. 2000. 토양 및 식물체 분석법, pp. 202.
10 민병미. 2004. 통보리사초의 생육 특성. 한국생태학회지 27: 49-55.
11 산림청. 2007. 해안방재림 실태조사 및 정책방향에 대한연구. pp. 329.
12 송호경, 박관수, 박혜림, 서은경, 소순구, 김무열. 2005. 태안군 신두리 해안사구의 식생과 토양특성. 한국환경복원녹화기술학회지 8: 59-68.
13 오승환, 김혁진. 2008. 남해안 및 제주도 일대 해안사구의 자원식물상. 한국자원식물학회지 21: 374-387.
14 이덕봉, 김연창. 1961. 美大陸原産植物의 渡來考. 식물학회지 4(1): 25-30.
15 이영노, 오용자. 1974. 한국의 귀화식물(1). 한국생활과학연구원 논집 12: 87-93.
16 이우철, 전상근. 1984. 한국해안식물의 생태학적 연구: 서해안 사구식생에 관하여. 한국생태학회지 7: 74-84.
17 이유미, 박수현, 정수영, 오승환, 양종철. 2011. 한국내귀화식물의 현황과 고찰. 식물분류학회지 41(1): 87-101.
18 임동옥, 황인천, 황정환, 박선주. 2009. 독도 귀화식물과 관리방안. 한국자원식물학회지 22(1): 96-101.
19 임양재, 전의식. 1980. 한반도의 귀화식물 분포. 한국식물학회지 23: 69-83.
20 이종명, 장용창, 홍선욱, 최현우 2012. 우이도 사구 해안의 외국기인 해양쓰레기 특성. 해양환경안전학회지 18(2): 167-174.
21 Chapman, V.J. 1938. Studies in salt marsh ecology : sections to . Journal of Ecology 26: 114-179.
22 정태현. 1970. 한국동식물도감 제 5권 식물편 보유. 문교부. pp. 232.
23 한희정. 2002. 귀화식물의 지리적 분포와 인위적인 요인 분석 - 아까시나무를 중심으로 -. 경희대학교 석사학위논문. pp. 95.
24 Andrea J.P. 1997. Control of European Beachgrass (Ammophila arenaria) on the West Coast of the United States. California Ecotic Pest Plant Council Symposium, pp. 8.
25 Del Moral, R. and Waston, A.F. 1978. Vegetationon stikine analysis. Northwest Science 33: 43-64.
26 Eilers, H.P. 1975. Plant, plant communities, net production and tide levels: the ecological biogeography of the Nehalem salt marshes. Tillamook Counly, Oregon. Ph. D. Dissertation, Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR, pp. 354.
27 Jefferson, C. 1975. Plant communities and succession and in Oregon coastal salt marshes. Ph. D. Dissertation, Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR, pp. 192.
28 Palibin, J.W. 1898. Conspectus florae Koreae(${\bullet}{\times}$). Acta, Horti Petropolitani. 17: 1-128.
29 Mooney, H.A. 1996. The SCOPE initiatives: The background and plans for a global strategy on invasive species. Norwegian Institute for Nature Rsearch. Trondheim, Norway. pp. 30-33.
30 Nichols, G.E. 1920. The vegetation of Connecticut. . The association of depositing areas along the seacoast. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 47: 511-548.   DOI
31 Parrondo, R.T., Gosselink, J.G., and Hopkimson, C.S. 1978. Effect of salinity and drainage on the growth of three salt marsh grasses. Botanical Gazette 139: 102-107.   DOI
32 Penfound, W.T. 1952. Southern swamps and marshes. The Botanical Review 18: 413-446.   DOI
33 Seeman, J.R. and Critchley, C. 1985. Effect of salt stress on the growth, ion content, stomatal behavior and photosynthetic capacity of a salt-sensitive species, Phaseolus vulgaris L. Planta 164: 151-162.   DOI
34 Pezeshki, S.R and Chambers, J.L. 1986. Effect of soil salinity on stomatal conductance and photosynthesis of green ash. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 16: 569-573.   DOI
35 Robinson, S.P., Downton, T.S. and Millhouse, J.A. 1983. Photosynthesis and ion content of leaves and isolated chloroplasts of salt stressed spinach. Plant Physiology 73: 238-242.   DOI
36 Sarah H.R. 1996. What Traits Distinguish Invasive Plants from Non-invasive Plants?. California Ecotic Pest Plant Council Symposium, pp. 10.
37 Vogl. R.J. 1966. Salt marsh vegetation of upper New Port Bay, California. Ecology 47: 80-87.   DOI