Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14578/jkfs.2011.100.4.3

International Trend of REDD Discussion and It's Policy Implication  

Kim, Tongil (Division Forest Recreation & Culture, Korea Forest Research Institute)
Kim, Seong-il (Department of Forest Sciences, Seoul National University)
Teplyakov, Victor K. (Department of Forest Sciences, Seoul National University)
Lee, Dong-Ho (Department of Forest Sciences, Seoul National University)
Choi, Gayoung (Department of Forest Sciences, Seoul National University)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Society of Forest Science / v.100, no.4, 2011 , pp. 548-557 More about this Journal
Abstract
REDD is recognized as a cost-effective and the most appropriate way of managing global GHG emissions. It is negotiated in a global context under the UNFCCC. The main issues of the REDD mechanism are divided into two parts: 1) developing forest carbon verification and measurement system for reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation, 2) establishing an appropriate system of incentives for developing countries. REDD can provide stability in carbon offset credits. However, the most important task is to establish a clear legal framework and appropriate governance structures with relevant countries. There is a wide opportunities for Republic of Korea to take a lead in cutting off greenhouse gasses in the Post-Kyoto period.
Keywords
REDD; REDD+; forest carbon; climate change; forest governance;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 김성일. 2011. REDD가 Hot한 이유 7가지. Anybook.
2 녹색성장위원회. 2009a. 온실가스 감축목표. http://www.greengrowth.go.kr/www/policy/onsil/onsil.cms (2011.10.20.)
3 녹색성장위원회. 2009b. 국가 온실가스 중기(2020년) 감축목표의 설정방안.
4 배재수. 2007. 기후변화협약하 개발도상국 산림전용의 감축 논의 과정 및 전망. 산림경제연구 15(1): 67-79.
5 배재수, 배기강. 2009. 개도국의 산림전용으로 인한 온실가스 배출량 감축 및 산림탄소축적 증진 활동의 탄소 배출권 잠재력 평가. 한국임학회지 98(3): 263-271.
6 산림청. 2009a. 기후변화협약 및 교토의정서에서 산림분야 논의 흐름 및 동향 분석. 기후변화대응 산림정책연구개발 사업단 연구보고서.
7 산림청. 2009b. 기후변화 대응 및 적응을 위한 산림부문 아시아지역 협력 촉진 메커니즘 개발.
8 산림청. 2010. 개도국 탄소흡수원 분야 기후변화 대응역량강화를 위한 국제협력사업 확대방안.
9 한국농촌경제연구원. 2010. 기후변화협약 REDD+ 메커니즘의 이해와 향후 협상전망.
10 Boer, R. 2010. Forest Carbon Project Opportunity in Indonesia. 2010 한국-인도네시아 REDD+ 협력을 위한 국제세미나 자료집.
11 Dudley, N., Stolton, S., Belokurov, A., Kruger, L., Lopoukhine, N., Mackinnon, K., Sandwith, T. and Sekhran, N., eds, 2010. Natural Solutions : Protected Areas Helping People Cope with Climate Change. IUCN-WCPA, TNC, UNDP, WCS, The World Bank and WWF, Gland, Swtizerland, Washington DC and Newyotk, USA.
12 Ecosystem Marketplace and New Carbon Finance. 2008. Forging a New Frontier : State of the Voluntary Carbon Markets 2008.
13 FAO. 2006. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2005 : Progress towards Sustainable Forestry Management. FAO Forestry Paper 147. Food and Agriculture organizations of the United Nations.
14 FAO. 2010. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2010 : Main Report, FAO Forestry Paper 163. Food and Agriculture organizations of the United Nations.
15 FERN. 2008. An Overview of Selected REDD Proposals.
16 IPCC. 2001. Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Contribution of WG I to the Third Assessment Report of the IPCC. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
17 IPCC. 2007. Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fourth Assessment Report.
18 Johns, T. and Johnson, E., eds. 2008. An overview of readiness for REDD: A compilation of readiness activities prepared on behalf of the Forum on Readiness for REDD. Woods Hole Research Center. (Olse, N. and Bishop, J. 2009. The Financial Costs of REDD : Evidence form Brzail and Indonesia. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland)에서 재 인용.
19 Rollinson, T.J.D. 2007. Forests and Climate Change: Conclusions and the Way Forward. pp. 233-240. In : Freer- Smith, P.H., Broadmeadow, M.S.J. and Lynch, J.M. eds. Forestry & Climate Change. Cromwell Press Group, Trowbridge, UK.
20 Point Carbon. 2010. Carbon 2010 - Return of the Sovereign. Tvinnereim, E. and Rone, K.(eds.)
21 Sathaye, J.A., Makundi, W., Dale, L., Chan, P. and Andrasko, K. 2007. GHG Mitigation Potential, Cost and Benefits in global forest. A dynamic partial equilibrium approach. Energy Journal, Special Issue 3. pp. 127-172.
22 The Nature Conservancy, CCBA(The Climate, Community and Biodiversity Alliance), Conervation International, GTZ, Rainforest Alliance and World Wildlife Fund. 2009. Introductory Course on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation : A Participant Resource Manual.
23 Stern, N. 2006. Stern Review: The Economics of Climate Change. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, UK.
24 Stern, N. 2007. The Economics of Climate Change : The Stern Review. Cambridge and New York.
25 Takashi, H. 2010. Hatoyama Initiative and Japanese Carbon Market. Carbon Expo 2010.
26 UN-REDD Programme. 2010. Perspectives on REDD+.
27 UNEP-WCMC. 2007. Reducing Emissions from Deforestation : A key opportunity for attaining multiple benefits. Cambridge. pp. 15.