Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14578/jkfs.2011.100.3.23

Study on Application of IUCN Management Category System on Baekdudaegan Protected Area  

Kim, Seongil (Department of Forest Resources, Seoul National University)
Kang, Mihee (Department of Forest Resources, Yeungnam University)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Society of Forest Science / v.100, no.3, 2011 , pp. 494-503 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study was aimed at applying the IUCN category system to the Baekdudaegan Protected Area. A classification key was developed to apply the system to the overlapped designated protected areas inside of Baekdudaegan Protected Area. Korea national parks and forests managers' and experts' opinions were collected and they all agreed to the use of multiple classification in Baekdudaegan Protected Area. For example, the type of natural forests among the Forest Genetic Resources Reserves was classified to be IUCN Category Ia while other types of Forest Genetic Resources Reserve was classified to be Category IV. And the Protected Forest Landscape was classified to be Category V while the other types of protected forests were classified to be Category VI. The study suggests the need of classification of forest protected areas including Baekdudaegan Protected Area using IUCN system accompanying with protected areas management effectiveness evaluation.
Keywords
IUCN management category system; Baekdudaegan Protected Area; classification key; WDPA;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Bishop, K., Dudley, N., Phillips, A. and Stolton, S. 2004. Speaking a Common Language: The uses and performance of the IUCN System of Management Categories for Protected Areas. Cardiff University, IUCN-The World Conservation Union, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK, and UNEP-World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge, UK.
2 Chape, Stuart. 2004. Systematic assignment of protected area management categories: an opportunity for achieving a measurable framework. PARKS, 1493): 51-62.
3 Dudley, N. ed. 2008. Guidelines for Applying Protected Area Management Categories. IUCN, Gland, Switerland.
4 Frank, G., Parviainen, J., Vandekerhove, K., Latham, J., Schuck, A. and Little, D. 2007. COST Action E27: Protected Forest Areas in Europe-Analysis and Harmonisation (PROFOR) - Results, Conclusions and Recommendations Federal Research and Training Centre for Forests, natural Hazards and Landscape (BFW). Vienna, Austria.
5 IUCN WCPA. 2006. Regional Action Plan for the Protected Areas of East Asia. Unpublished report.
6 IUCN. 1994. Guidelines for Protected Area Management Categories. NPPA with the assistance of WCMC. IUCN, Gland, Swizerland and Cambridge, UK.
7 MacKinnon, J. and Yan, Xie eds. 2008. Regional Action Plan for the Protected Areas of East Asia: 2006-2010. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Bangkok, Thailand.
8 WCPA Australia and New Zealand Region. 2000. Application of IUCN Protected Area Management Categories.
9 Phillips, A. 2003. Management Guidelines for IUCN Category V Protected Areas Protected Landscapes/Seascapes. Best Practice Protected Area Guidelines Series 9. IUCN.
10 국립공원관리공단. 2006. 우리나라 보호지역에 IUCN 카테고리 채택 방안: 국립공원을 중심으로. 국립공원관리공단. pp. 150.
11 김 현. 2008. 우리나라 국립공원에 세계자연보전연맹(IUCN) 보호지역 관리 범주 적용에 관한 연구. 서울대학교 석사학위논문.
12 산림청. 2006. 백두대간보호 기본계획: 2006-2015. 산림청. pp. 133.
13 우형택. 2002. 국제기준에 근거한 남북한 자연보호지역의 실상 비교. 한국환경과학회지 11(1): 1-14.
14 허학영, 김 현, 이영주, 김성일. 2007. 우리나라 보호지역에 IUCN 카테고리 적용 방안에 관한 연구. 환경정책연구 6(2): 71-96.
15 Averous, Christian. 2006. 한국의 OECD 환경성과 평가. 환경부. pp. 5-10.
16 Locke, H. and Dearden, P. 2005. Rethinking Protected Area Categories and the New Paradigm. Environmental Conservation 32(1): 1-10.   DOI   ScienceOn