Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14578/jkfs.2011.100.3.3

German Forest Recreation in Nature Parks (Naturpark)  

Lee, Ju-Hyoung (Department of Forest Resources, Yeung-Nam University)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Society of Forest Science / v.100, no.3, 2011 , pp. 334-343 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of the present research is to study the recreational use of German Nature Parks with comparing the Korean Recreational Forests. They were studied because both were not only founded for nature protection, but also for recreational use. The recreational offerings of German Nature Parks and Korean Recreational Forests found to reflect the expectations of their recreation users. Therefore the recreational uses of both countries will be recognized throughout this study. To review recreational offerings, services and infrastructure, a complete search of all German Nature Parks and Korean Recreational Forests was conducted. In summary, there were very good and varied activities that posed few demands on German Nature Parks. Some broad and very good offerings could be identified in the form of environmental education programs as well as many different kinds of services and infrastructure. Korean Recreational Forests were characterized by passive activities having few environmental education programs with only simple tour themes. The reason for this condition was that there were fewer holiday periods in Korea than in Germany and the conurbation life style in Korea, due to geological conditions, has led to less experience with nature.
Keywords
german naturepark; naturpark; korean recreational forests; recreation; comparative study;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 김우역 역. 2003. 인류학의 역사와 이론. 앨런 바너드. 한길사
2 독일통계청. 2010. 통계연보. 독일통계청.
3 산림청. 2010, 임업통계연보 제40호. 산림청.
4 윤영일. 2000. 국립공원에 현존하는 문제의 근원적 특성고찰 - 동서자연관의 차이로 조명한 문제점의 특성 -. 한국공원휴양학회지 2(2): 113-121.
5 이주형. 2010. 사회적 배경과 관련법을 통해서 본 독일 숲휴양. 한국산림휴양학회지 14(4): 81-91.
6 조한혜정. 1998. 불균형 발전 속의 주체형성. 철학과 현실 37: 222-247.
7 Ammer, U. and Proebstl, U. 1991. Freizeit und Natur: Probleme und Loesungsmoeglichkeiten einer oekologisch vertraeglichen Freizeitnutzung. Paul Parey, Berlin/Hamburg. 228pp.
8 Bundesministerium fuer Ernaehrung, Landwirtschaft und Verbraucherschutz. 2002. Bundeswaldinventur 2. Bundesministerium fuer Ernaehrung, Landwirtschaft und Verbraucherschutz.
9 Buerger-Arndt, R. and Bell, S. 2009. The recreation planning process. In: Bell, S. et al (Hrsg.) European Forest Recreation and Tourism. Taylor & Francis Verlg. pp. 177-206.
10 Eyer, H. 1960. Der Wald als Gegengewicht gegen die Zivilisationsschaeden unserer Zeit. pp. 40-53.
11 Job, H. 1993. Braucht Deutschland die Naturparke noch ? - Eine Stellungnahme zur Diskussion um Grossschutzgebiete. In: Naturschutz und Landespflege 25(4) Muenchen, Hannover, Berlin.
12 Kuester, H. 1999. Geschichte der Landschaft in Mitteleuropa. Verlag C.H.Beck Muenchen.
13 Lee, J.H. and Buerger-Arndt, R. 2010. Freizeitund Erholungsangebote in Deutschen Naturparken. Naturschutz und Naturparke. VNP. Heft 216: 33-39.
14 Lee, J.H. 2010. Walderholung in Korea und in Deutschland. University Press Goettingen.
15 OECD. 2009. OECD Employment Outlook 2009. OECD Publishing. pp. 272-273.
16 Scharpf, H. 1998. Tourismus in Grossschutzgebieten. In: Engelhardt, W. Freizeit, Tourismus und Umwelt. Economica Verl.
17 VDN(Verband Deutscher Naturpark). 2003. 40 Jahre Naturparke. Verband Deutscher Naturparke e.V.
18 VDN(Verband Deutscher Naturpark). 2005. Die deutschen Naturparke - Aufgabe und Ziele. Schriftenreihe des Verbandes Deutscher Naturparke e.V.