Browse > Article

Species Diversity, Composition and Stand Structure of Tropical Deciduous Forests in Myanmar  

Oo, Thaung Naing (Silviculture and Restoration Ecology Laboratory, Department of Forest Sciences, Seoul National University)
Lee, Don Koo (Silviculture and Restoration Ecology Laboratory, Department of Forest Sciences, Seoul National University)
Combalicer, Marilyn (Silviculture and Restoration Ecology Laboratory, Department of Forest Sciences, Seoul National University)
Kyi, Yin Yin (Forest Development Division, Forest Research Institute, Forest Department)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Society of Forest Science / v.97, no.2, 2008 , pp. 171-180 More about this Journal
Abstract
The characterization of tree species and forest stand conditions is useful in the planning of activities aimed to conserve biodiversity. The main objective of this study was to describe tree species diversity, species composition and stand structure of tropical deciduous forests distributed in three regions in Myanmar. Forest inventory was conducted in the Oktwin teak bearing forest, the Letpanpin community forest and Alaungdaw Kathapa National Park. According to the Jackknife estimator of species richness, 85 species (${\pm}18.16$), 70 species (${\pm}5.88$) and 186 species (${\pm}17.10$) belonging to 31 families were found in the Oktwin teak bearing forest, 33 families in Letpanpin community forest and 53 families in Alaungdaw Kathapa national park, respectively. Shannon's diversity indices were significantly different among the forests (p<0.05). It ranged from 3.36 to 4.36. Mean tree density (n/ha) of the Oktwin teak bearing forest, Letpanpin community forest and Alaungdaw Kathapa National Park were 488 (${\pm}18.6$), 535 (${\pm}15.6$) and 412 (${\pm}14.1$), while basal areas per hectare were $46.96m^2({\pm}3.23),\;49.01m^2({\pm}5.08)\;and\;60.03m^2({\pm}3.88)$, respectively. At the family level, Verbenaceae, Myrtaceae and Combretaceae occupied the highest importance value index, while at the species level it was Tectona grandis, Lagerstoremia speciosa and Xylia xylocarpa.
Keywords
diameter size distribution; floristic similarity; importance value; species richness; stock density;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Curtis, J.T. and McIntosh, R.P. 1951. An upland forest continuum in the prairie-forest border region on Wisconsin. Ecology 32: 476-496   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Magurran, A.E. 1988. Ecological Diversity and Its Measurement. Croom Helm, London
3 Manokaran, N. and Kochummen, K.M. 1987. Recruitment, growth and mortality of tree species in a lowland dipterocarp forest in Peninsular Malaysia. J. Trop. Ecol. 3: 315-330   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Martijena, N.E. and Bullock, S.H. 1994. Monospecific dominance of a tropical deciduous forest in Mexico. J. Biogeogr. 21: 63-74.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Mather, P.M. 1976. Computational Methods of Multivariate Analysis in Physical Geography. J. Wiley & Sons, London
6 Okali, D.U.U. and Ola-adams, B.A. 1987. Tree population changes in treated rain forest at Omo Forest Reserve, South-western Nigeria. J. Trop. Ecol. 3: 291- 313   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Simpson, E.H. 1949. Measurement of diversity. Nature 163: 168
8 Zin, A.T. 2000. Potentialities and Constraints of Teak Bearing Forest For Sustainable Forest Management Under Current Management System in Ok-twin Township Forest, Bago Yoma Region, Myanmar. 'MSc Thesis', Dresden Technical Universtiy, Tharandt, Germany
9 Whitemore, T.C. 1984. Tropical Rain Forests of the Far East. Second edition. Oxford University Press. Oxford
10 Crow, T.R. 1980. A rainforest chronicle: a 30-year record of change in structure and composition at El Verde, Puerto Rico. Biotropica 12: 42-55   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Hitimana, J., Kiyiapi, J.L. and Njunge, J.T. 2004. Forest structure characteristics in disturbed and undisturbed sites of Mt. Elgon Moist Lower Montane Forest, western Kenya. For. Ecol. Manage. 194, 269: 291
12 Mani, S. and Parthasarathy, N. 2005. Biodiversity assessment of trees in five inland tropical dry evergreen forests of peninsular India. Systematic and Biodiversity 3: 1-12   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Torti, S.D., Coley, P.D. and Kursar, T.A. 2001. Causes and consequences of monodominance in tropical lowland forests. Am. Nat. 157: 141-153   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Gross, N.D., Torti, S.D., Feener, Jr. D.H. and Coley, P.D. 2000. Monodominance in an African rain forest: is reduced herbivory important? Biotropica 32: 430-439   DOI
15 Rennolls, K. and Laumonier, Y. 2000. Species diversity structure analysis at two sites in the tropical rain forest of Sumatra. J. Trop. Ecol. 16: 253-270   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Krebs, C.J. 1999. Ecological Methodology (Second edition). Addison Wesley Longman, Inc, Canada
17 Kyaw, N.N. 2003. Site Influence on Growth and Phenotype of Teak (Tectona grandis Linn. f.) in Natural Forests of Myanmar. 'PhD Dissertation', Der Georg- August-Universitat Gottingen, Cuvillier Verlag, Gottingen, Germany
18 Thaung, N.O. and Lee, D.K. 2007. Species composition and stand structure of natural forest, timber-harvested forest and degraded forest in the Bago Yoma Region of Myanmar. Jour. Korean For. Soc. 96: 572-579
19 Trejo, I. and Dirzo, R. 2000. Deforestation of seasonally dry tropical forest: a national and local analysis in Mexico. Biol. Conser. 94: 133-142   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Win, O. and Sint, N. 1997. Manual for Watershed Management. ICIMOD, Kathman, Nepal
21 Heltshe, J.F. and Forrester, N.E. 1983. Estimating species richness using Jackknife procedure. Biometric 39, 1: 1-11   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Mani, S. and Parthasarathy, N. 2006. Tree diversity and stand structure in inland and coastal tropical dry evergreen forests of peninsular India. Curr. Sci. 90: 1238- 1246
23 Nascimento, M.T., Proctor, J. and Villela, D.M. 1997. Forest structure, floristic composition and soils of an Amazonian monodominant forest on Maraca Island, Roraima, Brazil. Edinburgh Journal of Botany 54: 1-38   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Anon. 2007. Climatic Data of Myanmar (Unpublished). Department of Meteorology and Hydrology, Yangon, Myanmar
25 Phillips, O.L., Martinez, R.V., Vargas, P.N., Monteagudo, A.L., Zans, M.C., Sanchez, W.G., Cruz, A.P., Timana, M., Ylihalla, M. and Rose, S. 2003. Efficient plot-based floristic assessment of tropical forests. J. Trop. Ecol. 19: 629-645   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Proctor, J., Anderson, J.M., Chai, P. and Vallack, H.W. 1983. Ecological studies in four contrasting lowland rain forests in Gunung Mulu National Park, Sarawak. J. Ecol. 71: 237-260   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Davis, L.S. and Johnson, K.N. 1987. Forest Management. Third edition. McGraw-Hill, New York
28 Matius, P., Toma, T. and Sutisna, M. 2000. Tree Species Composition of A Burned Lowland Dipterocarp Forest in Bukit Soeharto, East Kalimantan. pp. 99-106. In: Guhardja, E. (Ed.), Rainforest Ecosystems of East Kalimantan: El Nino, Drought, Fire and Human Impacts. Springer-Verlag, Tokyo
29 Uhl, C. and Murphy, P.G. 1981. Composition, structure and regeneration of a Tierra Firme forest in the Amazon basin of Venezuela. J. Trop. Ecol. 22: 219-237
30 Read, J., Hallam, P. and Cherrier, J. 1995. The anomaly of monodominant tropical rain forests: some preliminary observations in the Nothofagus-dominated rainforests of New Caledonia. J. Trop. Ecol. 11: 359-389   DOI   ScienceOn
31 Rubin, B.D., Manion, P.D. and Langendoen, D.F. 2006. Diameter distributions and structural sustainability in forests. For. Ecol. Manage. 222, 427: 438
32 Swaine, M.D., Hall, J.B. and Alexander, I.J. 1987. Tree population dynamics at Kade, Ghana (1968-1982). J. Trop. Ecol. 3: 331-345   DOI   ScienceOn
33 Pascal, J.P. and Pelissier, R. 1996. Structure and floristic composition of a tropical evergreen forest in southwest India. J. Trop. Ecol. 12: 191-214   DOI   ScienceOn
34 Jacobs, M. 1988. The Tropical Rain Forest: A First Encounter. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany
35 Lieberman, D. and Lieberman, M. 1987. Forest tree growth and dynamics at La Selva, Costa Rica (1969-1982). J. Trop. Ecol. 3: 347-358   DOI   ScienceOn
36 Manokaran, N. and La-Frankie, J.V. 1990. Stand structure of Pasoh Reserve Forest, a lowland rain forest in Peninsular Malaysia. J. Trop. For. Sci. 3: 14-24