Browse > Article

Ecological Diagnosis on Korean Red Pine (Pinus densiflora Seibold & Zucc) Stands in Isolated Urban Forest  

Cho, Hyun-Je (College of Environment, Keimyung University)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Society of Forest Science / v.96, no.4, 2007 , pp. 419-424 More about this Journal
Abstract
The urban forest offer many opportunities to maintain and enhance local and regional biological diversity. Pinus densiflora stands in isolated urban forest in five areas of Seoul, Incheon, Daegu, Ulsan, and Cheongju were investigated by landscape and community ecological methods for diagnosis of current status and construction of conservation plan. Species composition of five study areas revealed regional characteristics. As the result of stand dynamics, absence of pine seedlings and saplings were observed. Cheongju, significantly, revealed highest species diversity (H'=1.86) and richness (24) among study areas, and the opposite was true for Daegu (1.35 for H', and 14 for richness). Ratio of alien species was highest in Daegu (15.8%) (F=5.05, p=0.0016). Based on landscape analysis, complexity of pine patch was higher in local city than metropolitans, but statistically not significant (p=0.133). Complexity of pine patch revealed significant positive correlation with diversity and richness, but not with percentage of aliens. Synthetically, ecological management based on community and landscape ecological information was recommended. Cautious artificial regeneration strategy was necessary to regenerate pine forest in urban area.
Keywords
Pinus densiflora; urban forest; urbanization; ecological management; regeneration;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 국가표준식물목록. 2006. http://www.koreaplants.go.kr
2 이창복. 1985. 대한식물도감. 향문사
3 Bastian, O., Bernhardt, A. 1993. Anthropogenic landscape changes in Central Europe and the role of bioindication. Landscape Ecology 8: 139-151   DOI
4 Cho, HJ., Cho, J.H., Lee, C.S. 1999. Forest Vegetation Units and Landscape Structure of Mt. Inwang in Seoul, Korea. Jour. Korean For. Soc. 88: 342-351
5 Dale, Y.H., Brown, S., Haeuber, R.A., Hobbs, N.T., Huntly, N., Niman, R.J., Ridbsame, W.E., Turner, M.G., Valone, T.J. 2000. Ecological principles and guidelines for managing the use of land. Ecological Applications 10: 639-670
6 Kamada, M., Nakagoshi, N., Nehira, K. 1991. Pine forest ecology and landscape management : A comparative study in Japan and Korea. In: Coniferous forest ecology from an international perspective (Nakagoshi N, Golley FB, eds). SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague, pp. 4362
7 Lee, C.S., Lee, A.N., Cho, Y.C. 2007b. Restoration planning of the Seoul Metropolitan area, Korea toward eco- city. In: Urban forests (Carreiro MM ed). Springer, New York (in press)
8 이창석. 1995. 한국소나무림에서의 교란 후 재생과정. 한국생태학회지 18: 189-201
9 진영환, 이돈구. 2000. 묘목의 Gap내 생장 및 생리적 적응 과정. 한국임학회지 89: 452-460
10 Sharitz, R.R., Boring, L.R., Vanlear, D.H., Pinder, J.E. 1992. Integrating ecological concepts with natural resource management of southern forest. Ecological Applications 2: 226-237   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Lee, C.S., Hong, S.K. Changes of landscape pattern and vegetation structure in rural area disturbed by fire. Kor. J. Ecol. 21: 389-399
12 Magurran AE. 2004. Measuring Biological Diversity, Blackwell Publishing, Massachusetts
13 박수현. 1995. 한국귀화식물도감. 일조각
14 Cho, H.J., Cho, Y.C., Lee, C.S. 2006. Degradation of Lowland Forest Landscape and Management Strategy to Improve Ecological Quality in Mt. Baekja and Its Surroundings. J. Ecol. Field BioI. 29(5): 101-105
15 Anderson EM. 1993. Conservation biology and the urban forest. Proceedings of the sixth national urban forest conference. pp 234-238
16 McCune, B., Grace, J.B. 2002. Analysis of Ecological Communities. MjM Software Design. Gleneden Beach, Ore gon, USA
17 Riitters, K., Wickham, R., O'Neill, R., Jones, B., Smith, E. 2000. Global-scale patterns of forest fragmentation. Conservation Ecology 4: 3. [online] URL: http://www. conseleoI.org/vol 4/iss2/ art3
18 Braun-Blanquet, J. 1964. Pflanzensoziologie. Grundze der Begetaionskunde. Springer-Verlag, Wein
19 Curtis, J.T., McIntosh, R.P. 1951. An upland forest continuum in the prairie-forest border region of Wisconsin. Ecology 32: 476-498   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Elton, C.S. 1958. The ecology of invasions by animals and plants. Methuen, London
21 McCarigal, K., Marks, B.J. 1995. FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-351. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Station, Portland, Oregon
22 Lee, C.S, Song, H.G., Kim, H.S., Lee, B., Pi, J.H., Cho, Y.C, Seol, E.S., Oh, W.S., Park, SA, Lee, S.M. 2007a. Which Environmental Factors Caused Lammas Shoot Growth of Korean Red Pine? J. Ecol. Field Biol. 30: 101-105   과학기술학회마을   DOI
23 Hill, M.O. 1979. DECORANA-A FORTRAN program for detrended correspondence analysis and reciprocal averaging-. Cornell University Ithaca, New York, 52pp
24 Noss, R.F. 1983. A regional landscape approach to maintain diversity. Bioscience 33: 700-706   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Saunders, D.A., Hobbs, R.H., Margules, C.R. 1991. Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: a review. Conservation Biology 9: 18-32
26 Liu, J, Taylor, W.W. 2002. Coupling landscape ecology with natural resource management: Paradigm shifts and new approaches. In: Integrating Landscape Ecolgoy into Natural Resource Management (Liu J, Taylor WW, eds). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 3-19
27 Swanson, F.J., Franklin,J.F. 1992. New forestry principles from ecosystem analysis of Pacific Northwest forests. Ecological Applications 2: 262-274   DOI
28 산림청. 2002. 임업통계연보. 산림청. 서울
29 Miller, R.W. 1998. Urban forestry: planning and managing urban green spaces. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey
30 산림청. 1971. 임업통계연보. 산림청. 서울
31 Lee, C.S. 1989. A study on the succession of pine forests damaged b pine gall midge (PhD dissertation). Seoul National University, Seoul
32 Vogelmann, J.E, 1995. Assessment of forest fragmentation in southern New England using remote sensing and geographic information systems technology. Conservation Biology 9: 439-449   DOI   ScienceOn