Browse > Article

Difference in Growth, SOD Activity and MDA Content Between Ozone Tolerant and Sensitive Families of Open-Pollinated Pinus densiflora  

Lee, Jae-Cheon (Department of Forest Genetic Resources, Korea Forest Research Institute)
Oh, Chang-Young (Department of Forest Genetic Resources, Korea Forest Research Institute)
Han, Sim-Hee (Department of Forest Genetic Resources, Korea Forest Research Institute)
Kim, Jang-Su (Department of Forest Genetic Resources, Korea Forest Research Institute)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Society of Forest Science / v.95, no.3, 2006 , pp. 323-327 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study was conducted to understand response of damage and tolerance to ozone between ozone tolerant and sensitive families of P. densiflora which had been selected by the based on visual injury and growth. Five individuals were selected in each group, and were exposed to 100ppb ozone for 90 days. Every 30 days after ozone fumigation, diamter at root collar (ORC), superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity, and malondialdehyde (MDA) content were measured. In early state of ozone fumigation tolerant families showed three times higher relative DRC growth rate than sensitive families. And during whole fumigation period growth rate of tolerant families was superior to growth rate of sensitive families. SOD activity in sensitive families was increased 30 days after fumigation, and in accordance with fumigation period extended it was decreased continuously. MDA content in ozone treatment showed higher than in control, and MDA content of tolerant families was higher than that sensitive families. In our results tolerant families has higher antioxidative activity than sensitive families. Therefore tolerant families can restrain lipid peroxidation and damage on physiological activity.
Keywords
Pinus densiflora; relative growth rate; SOD; MDA; ozone sensitivity;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 이재천, 김장수, 한심희, 김판기. 2004. 오존에 노출된 자작나무류의 기공개폐와 광합성 반응. 한국농림기상학회 6: 11-17
2 이재천, 오창영, 한심희, 김판기. 2005b. 오존 노출시간에 따른 버즘나무와 백합나무의 광합성과 SOD 활성 변화. 한국농림기상학회지 7: 156-163
3 이재천, 김인식, 여진기, 구영본. 2001. 잎의 가시적 피애에 따른 오존에 대한 미루나무(Populus deltoides) 클론간 감수성 비교. 한국임학회지 90: 10-18
4 Ferdinand, J.A., T.S. Fredericksen, K.B. Kouteric and J.M. Skelly. 2000. Leaf morphology and ozone sensitivity of two open pollinated genotypes of black cherry (Prunus serotina) seedlings. Environmental Pollution 108: 297-302   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Heath, R.L. 1980. Initial events in injury to plants by air pollutants. Annual Review of Plants Physiology 31: 395-431   DOI
6 Heath, R.L. and G.E. Taylor. 1997. Physiological processes and plant responses to ozone exposure. pp. 317-368. In : Sandermann, H., A.L. Wellburn and R.L. Heath, ed. Forest Decline and Ozone, Ecological Studies. Springer-Verlag
7 Bergmann, E., J. Bender, and H.J. Weigel. 1999. Ozone threshold doses and exposure-response relationships for the development of ozone injury symptoms in wild plant species. New Phytologist 144: 423-435   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Bungener, P., G.R. Balls, S. Nussbaum, M. Giessman, A. Grub and J. Furher. 1999. Leaf injury characteristics of grassland species exposed to ozone in relation to soil moisture condition and vapour pressure deficit. New Phytologist 142: 271-282   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Esterbauer, H. and K.H. Cheeseman. 1990. Determination of aldehydic lipid peroxidation products: malonaldehyde and 4-hydroxynonenal. Methods in Enzymology 186: 407-42l   DOI
10 Hippeli, S. and E. Elstner. 1996. Mechanisms of oxygen activation during plant stress: biochemical effects of air pollutants. Journal of Plant Physiology 148: 249-257   DOI
11 Guidi, L., M. Tonini, and G.F. Soldatini. 2000. Effects of high light and ozone fumigation on photosynthesis in Phaseolus vulgaris. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 38: 717-725   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Paakkonen, E., J. Vahala, T. Holopainen, R. Karjalainen and L. Karenlampi. 1996. Growth responses and related biochemical and ultrastructural changes of the photosynthetic apparatus in birch (Betula pendula) saplings exposed to low concentrations of ozone. Tree Physiology 16: 597-605   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Li, Y., Y. Zu, J. Chen, H. Chen, J. Yang and Z. Hu. 2000. Intraspecific differences in physiological response of 20 wheat cultivars to enhanced ultraviolet-B radiation under field conditions. Environmental and Experimental Botany 44: 95-103   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Bennet, J.H., E.H. Lee and H.E. Heggestad. 1984. Biochemical aspect of plant. pp. 413-424. In : Koziol, M.J. and F.R. Whatley, ed. Gaseous Air Pollutants and Plant Metabolism. Butterworth. England
15 이재천, 오창영, 한심희, 김장수. 2005a. 소나무 풍매차 대묘의 가계간 오존에 대한 민감성 반응. 한국임학회지 94: 191-196
16 Asada, K., M. Takahashi and M. Nagate. 1974. Assay and inhibitors of spinach superoxide dismutase. Agricultural and Biological Chemistry 38: 471-473   DOI
17 Bortier, J., K. Vandermerien, L. De Temmerman and R. Ceulemans. 2001. Growth, photosynthesis and ozone uptake of young beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) in response to different ozone exposures. Trees 15: 75-82   DOI
18 Beauchamp, C. and I. Fridovichi. 1971. Superoxide dismutase: Improved assays and an assay applicable to acrylamide gels. Analytical Biochemistry 44: 276-287   DOI   ScienceOn
19 한심희, 이재천, 장석성, 홍용표. 2002. 탄수화물 배분과 분할 패턴을 기초로 한 자작나무류 4수종의 오존 민감성 비교. 한국임학회지 91: 449-456
20 Karnosky, D.F., G.K. Podila, Z. Gagnon, P. Pechter, A. Akkapeddi, Y. Sheng, D.E. Riemenschneider, M.D. Coleman, R.E. Dickson and J.G. Isebrands. 1998. Genetic control of responses to interacting tropospheric ozone and $CO_{2}$ in Populus tremuloides. Chemosphere 36: 807-812   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Shannon, J.G. and C.L. Mulchi. 1974. Ozone damage to wheat varieties at anthesis. Crop Science 14: 335-337   DOI
22 Beadle, C.L. 1993. Growth analysis. pp. 36-46. In : D.O. Hall, J.M.O. Scurlock. H.R. Bolhar-Nordenkampf, R.C. Leegood, and S.P. Long, ed. Photosynthesis and Production in a Changing Environment, A Filed and Laboratory Manual. Chapman & Hall. London
23 Pye, J.M. 1988. Impact of ozone on the growth and yield of trees: a review. Journal of Environmental Quality 17: 347-360   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Sheng, Y., G.K. Podila and D.F. Karnosky. 1997. Differences in $O_{3}$-induced superoxide dismutase and glutathione antioxidant expression in 03 tolerant and sensitive trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) clones. Forest Genetics 4: 25-33
25 Knox, J.P. and A.D. Dodge. 1985. Singlet oxygen and plants. Phytochemistry 24: 889-896   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Jiri, S., M. Gilbert, I. Weingart and C. Wilhelm. 2003. Thermoluminescence as a tool for monitoring ozone-stressed plants. Environmental Pollution 123: 15-20   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Steiner, K.C. and D.D. Davis. 1979. Variation among Fraxinus families in foliar response to ozone. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 9: 106-109   DOI