Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14346/JKOSOS.2022.37.2.43

Risk-Informed Optimization of Operation and Procedures for Korea Research Reactor  

Lee, Yoon-Hwan (Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute)
Jang, Seung-Cheol (Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society of Safety / v.37, no.2, 2022 , pp. 43-53 More about this Journal
Abstract
This paper describes an attempt to improve and optimize the operational safety level of a domestic research reactor by conducting a probabilistic safety assessment (PSA) under full-power operating conditions. The PSA was undertaken to assess the level of safety at an operating research reactor in Korea, to evaluate whether it is probabilistically safe and reliable to operate, and to obtain insights regarding the requisite procedural and design improvements for achieving safer operation. The technical objectives were to use the PSA to identify the accident sequences leading to core damage, and to conduct sensitivity analyses based thereon to derive insights regarding potential design and procedural improvements. Based on the dominant accident sequences identified by the PSA, eight types of sensitivity analysis were performed, and relevant insights for achieving safer operation were derived. When these insights were applied to the reactor design and operating procedure, the risk was found to be reduced by approximately ten times, and the safety was significantly improved. The results demonstrate that the PSA methodology is very effective for improving reactor safety in the full-power operating phase. In particular, it is a highly suitable approach for identifying the deficiencies of a reactor operating at full power, and for improving the reactor safety by overcoming those deficiencies.
Keywords
probabilistic safety assessment, PSA; core damage frequency, CDF; research reactor;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 AIMS-PSA S. H. Han, H. G. Lim and J. E. Yang, AIMS-PSA: A Software for Integrating Various Types of PSA, PSAM 9, 2008.
2 FTREX 1.9 Beta User Manual, EPRI and KAERI: 3002008108, 2016.
3 US NRC, Industry-Average Performance for Components and Initiating Events at U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Plants, NUREG/CR-6928, 2007.
4 IAEA, Generic Component Reliability Data for Research Reactor PSA, IAEA-TECDOC-930, 1997.
5 US NRC, Common-Cause Failure Parameter Estimations, NUREG/CR-5497, October 1998.
6 US NRC, "CCF parameter estimation, 2007 Update," http://nrcoe.inl.gov/results/CCF/ParamEst2007/ccfparamest.htm, September, 2008.
7 KAERI, Development of A Standard Method for Human Reliability Analysis (HRA) of Nuclear Power Plants: Level I PSA Full Power Internal HRA, KAERI/TR-2961, KAERI, 2005.
8 Y. H. Lee, "Design Improvement to a Research Reactor for Safety Enhancement using PSA," J. Korean Soc. Saf., Vol. 33, No. 3, 2018.
9 Y. H. Lee, "Internal Event Level 1 Probabilistic Safety Assessment for Korea Research Reactor", J. Korean Soc. Saf., Vol. 36, No. 4, 2021.
10 Y. H. Lee, "Initiating Event Selection and Analysis for Probabilistic Safety Assessment of Korea Research Reactor," J. Korean Soc. Saf., Vol. 36, No. 2, 2021.
11 KAERI, Analysis of Generic Common Cause Failure Event Data for Domestic Nuclear Power Plant, KAERI/TR-5296/2013, KAERI, 2013.
12 KAERI, KMRR Safety Analysis Report, KAERI/TR-710/ 1996, KAERI, 2018.
13 ALWR PRA Key Assumptions and Ground Rules, Rev. 7, EPRI, December 1997.