Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14346/JKOSOS.2011.26.6.104

Risk Evaluation Based on the Time Dependent Expected Loss Model in FMEA  

Kwon, Hyuck-Moo (Department of Systems Management and Engineering, Pukyong National University)
Hong, Sung-Hoon (Department of Industrial & Information Systems Engineering, Chonbuk National University)
Lee, Min-Koo (Department of Information and Statistics, Chungnam National University)
Sutrisno, Agung (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sam Ratulangi University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society of Safety / v.26, no.6, 2011 , pp. 104-110 More about this Journal
Abstract
In FMEA, the risk priority number(RPN) is used for risk evaluation on each failure mode. It is obtained by multiplying three components, i.e., severity, occurrence, and detectability of the corresponding failure mode. Each of the three components are usually determined on the basis of the past experience and technical knowledge. But this approach is not strictly objective in evaluating risk of a given failure mode and thus provide somewhat less scientific measure of risk. Assuming a homogeneous Poisson process for occurrence of the failures and causes, we propose a more scientific approach to evaluation of risk in FMEA. To quantify severity of each failure mode, the mission period is taken into consideration for the system. If the system faces no failure during its mission period, there are no losses. If any failure occurs during its mission period, the losses corresponding to the failure mode incurs. A longer remaining mission period is assumed to incur a larger loss. Detectability of each failure mode is then incorporated into the model assuming an exponential probability law for detection time of each failure cause. Based on the proposed model, an illustrative example and numerical analyses are provided.
Keywords
FMEA; RPN; homogeneous poisson process; time dependent loss model;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Eubanks, C. F., Kmenta, S. and Ishii, K., "Advanced FMEA Using behavior Modeling", ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, Sacramento, California, 1-10, 1997.
2 Jeegadeshan, C., Arunachalam, V. P., Devadasan, S. R. and Srinivasan, P. S. S., "Design and Development of Modified Service FMEA Model", International Journal of Services and Operations Management, Vol. 3, No. 1, 111-126, 2007.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Narayanagounder, S. and Karuppusami, G., "A New Approach for Prioritizing Failure Mode in Design FMEA Using Anova", World Academy of Science, Engineering, and technology, Vol. 49, 524-531, 2009.
4 Oolkalkar, A. D., Joshi, A. G. and Oolkalkar, D. S., "Quality Improvement in Haemodialysis Process Using FMEA", International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, Vol. 26, No. 8, 817-830, 2009.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Sawhney, R., Subburaman, K., Sonntag, C., Rao, P. R. V. and Capizzi, P., "A Modified FMEA Approach to Enhance Reliability In Lean Systems", International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, Vol. 24, No. 5, 525-546, 2010.
6 Senol, S., "Poisson Approach to Determine the Occurrence Degree in Failure Mode and Reliability Analysis", The Quality Management Journal, Vol. 14, No. 2, 12-24, 2007.
7 Chrysler LLC, Ford motor Company, and General Motors Corporation, FMEA Reference Manual, 4thed, 2008.
8 Agung, S. and Kwon, H., "An Expected Loss Model for Risk Prioritization in Service FMEA", California Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 8, No. 2, 27-38, 2010.
9 Bertolini, M., Braglia., M. and Carmignani, G., "An FMECA-based Approach to Process Analysis", International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking, Vol. 1, No. 20, 127-145, 2006.   DOI
10 Blivband, Z., Grabov, P. and Nakar, O., "Expanded FMEA(EFMEA)", Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, 31-36, 2004.