Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.6109/jkiice.2019.23.12.1710

A Study on the Evaluation Method of Defense Technology Valuation Using the Readability Level Assessment of Core National Defense Technology  

Lee, Hyung-Seog (Institute for National Security Strategy)
Shin, Chung-Jin (Korea University Graduate School of Management of Technilogy)
Kang, Seok-Joong (Korea University Graduate School of Management of Technilogy)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korea Institute of Information and Communication Engineering / v.23, no.12, 2019 , pp. 1710-1719 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study is intended to understand defense technologies that require the convergence of various technologies and the integration of systems, and to propose valuation methods that reflect the characteristics of each field. The measure of technology level, integration (system integration technology) between technologies, preparation of manufacturing, and maturity scale of the weapons system to be valued are measured according to the items of measurement factors to verify system performance, and to present a framework for estimating the quantitative values of core technologies using system maturity. Considering the characteristics of each technology field, the research suggests a proper valuation method. In evaluating the value of defense technologies, A proposal is made to evaluate the value of defense technology by competent technical experts in each field, using SRL, which can be evaluated according to the evaluation criteria reflecting the technical characteristics of each field, and to evaluate the completion of the entire system in quantitative terms.
Keywords
Defense Core Technology; Readiness Assessment; Technology Valuation; Value Prediction;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, Technical Evaluation Standards Operating Guidelines, Article 39 (Cost Approach), 2017
2 Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, "Technical Evaluation Standards Operating Guidelines", Article 37 (market approach), 2017
3 Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, "Technical Evaluation Standards Operating Guidelines", Article 39 (Revenue Approach), 2017
4 DAPA, "Defense Offset Manual", pp. 46, 2018.
5 J. C. Mankins, "Technology Readiness Level: NASA." 1995.
6 W. Tan, B. Sauser, J. E. Marquez, "Monte-Carlo Simulation Approach for System Readiness Level Estimation", Published and used by INCOSE with permission, pp.2, July. 2009.
7 B. Sauser, J. E. Marquez, R. Magnaye, W. Tan, A Systems Approach to Expanding the Technology Readiness Level within Defense Acquisition, International Journal of Defense Acquisition Management, Vol. 1, pp. 39-58 , 2009.
8 W. Tan, J. E. Marquez, B. Sauser, "A Probabilistic Approach to System Maturity Assessment" Systems Engineering Vol 14, No. 3, Wiley Periodicals, Inc. pp. 283, 2011.
9 M. F. Austin, D. M. York, PhD, System Readiness Assessment (SRA) An Illustrative Example, 2015 Conference on Systems Engineering Research, Procedia Computer Science, pp.486-496, 2015.
10 B. J. Sauser, "System Maturity indices for decision support in the defense acquisition process", Stevens Institute of Technology, pp. 21, 2015. TRL, IRL of Robotic Sercicing Mission For The Hubble Space Telescope Tech 1: Remote Manipulator System (RMS), Tech 2: Special Purpose Dexterous Manipulator (SPDM), Tech 3: Electronic Control Unit (ECU), Tech 4: Autonomous Grappling (AG) Tech 5; Autonomous Proximity Operations (APO), Tech 6: Laser Image Detection and Radar (LIDAR)
11 Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, "Technical Value Assessment Practice Guide", pp.4, Dec. 2017.