Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.6109/jkiice.2017.21.10.1862

Performance Evaluation of Hybrid Distributed Mobility Management  

Wie, Sunghong (Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, The Cyber University of Korea)
Jang, Jaeshin (Department of Electronic Telecommunications, Mechanical & Automotive Engineering, Inje University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korea Institute of Information and Communication Engineering / v.21, no.10, 2017 , pp. 1862-1872 More about this Journal
Abstract
To overcome the limitations of the current Central Mobility Management (CMM) protocols, IETF has been discussing about the Distributed Mobility Management (DMM) protocols that the centralized mobility functions of Home Agents (HA) are distributed to network edges closer to mobile users. The DMM protocol has some advantages of low-cost traffic delivery and high scalability. However, it faces several problems such as a high signaling cost and a complex address management. Especially, users moving at a high speed and with long-live sessions can make these problems worse. To reduce the high signaling cost for long-live sessions, we propose a novel hybrid DMM protocol allocating different mobility anchors according to the session durations. In this paper, we analyze the performance of the proposed hybrid DMM protocol and show superior performance with respect to the signaling cost.
Keywords
Hybrid Distributed Mobility Management; Proxy Mobile IP; Performance Analysis; Performance Evaluation;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Cisco Visual Networking Index: Global Mobile Data Traffic Forecast Update, 2016-2021 White Paper [Internet]. Available: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/collateral/service-provider/visual-networking-index-vni/mo bile-white-paper-c11-520862.html.
2 J. C. Zuniga, C. J. Bernardos, A. de la Oliva, T. Melia, R. Costa, and A. Reznik, "Distributed mobility management: A standards landscape," IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 80-87, March 2013.   DOI
3 D. H. Shin, D. Moses, M. Venkatachalam, and S. Bagchi, "Distributed mobility management for efficient video delivery over all-IP mobile networks: Competing approaches," IEEE Network, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 28-33, March/April 2013.   DOI
4 K. S. Kong, W. J. Lee, Y. H. Han, M. K. Shin, and H. R. You, "Mobility Management for All-IP Mobile Networks: Mobile IPv6 vs. Proxy Mobile IPv6," IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 36-45, April 2008.   DOI
5 F. Giust, C. J. Bernardos, and A. de la Oliva, "Analytic Evaluation and Experimental Validation of a Network-based IPv6 Distributed Mobility Management Solution," IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, vol 13, no. 11, pp. 2484- 2497, Nov. 2014.   DOI
6 F. Giust, L. Cominardi and C. J. Bernardos, "Distributed Mobility Management for Future 5G Networks: Overview and Analysis of Existing Approaches," IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 142-149, Jan. 2015.   DOI
7 S. Wie and J. Jang, "A Study for Performance Evaluation of Distributed Mobility Management based on Proxy Mobile IPv6," Journal of Korea Institute of Information and Communication Engineering, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 97-105, Jan. 2015.   DOI
8 J. H. Lee, Z. Yan, J. M. Bonnin and X. Lagrange, "Dynamic tunneling for network-based distributed mobility management coexisting with PMIPv6," in Proceedings of 24th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, London, UK, pp. 2995-3000, Sept. 2013.
9 F. V. Baumann and I. G. Niemegeers, "An evaluation of location management procedures," in Proceedings of the 3rd Annual International Conference on Universal Personal Communications, San Diego: CA, pp. 359-364, 1994.
10 T. T. Nguyen and C. Bonnet, "A Hybrid Centralized-Distributed Mobility Management for Supporing Highly Mobile Users," in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Communications, pp. 3939-3944, June 2015.