Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.6109/jkiice.2015.19.8.1780

Labeling network applicaion study policy settings for optimized transmission of multimedia internet  

Gu, Hyun-Sil (Department of Information & Communication Engg., Chosun University)
Hwang, Seong-kyu (Department of Information & Communication Engg., Chosun University)
Abstract
Traditional IP routing, see only the Destination Address When Forwarding Layer 3 routing and exchange information and Destination-Based Routing Lookup is required for all Hop. Thus, all routers Full Internet routing information, the route information of more than about 120,000 may require. Therefore, the router configuration, which can be dispersed in the environment, the traffic load is required in accordance with this congestion. In this study, a unique characteristic of the Internet in the environment of an existing network Best Effect for QoS guarantee and hardware high speed switching of large multimedia data transmitted using a Labeling for forwarding a packet environment configuration is required. Video Stream Broadcast Transport Labeling rather than in much of the higher performance of the multi-step policy to most of the Video Stream Packet deulim was fixed to Labeling Header Format proposes a method of applying an effective QoS policy to a more simplified policy.
Keywords
Labeling; Applied Policy; EXP; QoS;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Schulzrinne, H., et al, "RTP: A Transport Protocol for Real-Time Applications", IETF RFC 1889, January 1996.
2 Tom Taylor, “Megaco/H.248: A New Standard for Media Gateway Control”, IEEE Communications Magazine, pp.124-132, 2000.   DOI
3 IETF RFC 2475, “An Architecture forDifferentiated Services,” S. Blake, Dec. 1998.
4 Xipeng Xiao, etc., “Traffic engineering with MPLS inthe Internet,” IEEE Netwrok, Mar/Apr. 2000.
5 Kent and Atkinson, "Security Architecture for the Internet Protocol", RFC 2401, November 1998.
6 Uyless Black, “MPLS and Label Switching Networks”, Prentice Hall, 2001.
7 Christian E. Rothenberg et. al., "Revisiting Routing Control Platforms with the Eyes and Muscles of Software-Defined Networking", HotSDN'12, August 13, 2012, Helsinki, Finland.
8 Handley, M. and V. Jacobson, “SDP:Session Description Protocol”, RFC 2327, April 1998.
9 F. Cuervo, N. Greene, A. Rayhan, C. Huitema, B. Rosen, J.Segers, “Megaco Protocol Version 1.0”, RFC 3015, November 2000.
10 Matt Holdrege, Ilya Akramovich, C. Michael Brown, “Megaco MIB” Internet Draft, May 2001.