Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.6109/JKIICE.2009.13.7.1247

Differential Effectiveness of In-Vehicle Front-to-Rear-End Collision Warnings when Drivers Using Various Electronic Devices during Driving  

Lee, Se-Won (부산대학교 심리학과)
Lee, Jae-Sik (부산대학교 심리학과)
Abstract
The purpose of the present study was to compare and analyze the differential effects of in-vehicle electronic device usage types(searching for targeted destinations in navigational purpose, watching TV in entertain purpose, and dialing a cellular-phone in phone-usage purpose) on driver's front-to-rear-end collision avoidance behavior, and to find effective collision warning format for this behavior. The result indicated that (1) the drivers showed more impaired collision avoidance performances when they were asked to search the name of targeted destination than the other task requirements, and (2) auditory warning appeared to be most effective among the other types of warning. In particular, it was suggested that the "Visual-Only" collision warning could induce most undesirable result when the drivers were engaged in both visual and auditory information processing.
Keywords
Telematics; Driving Simulation; Collision Warnings; Driver Distraction;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 교통안전공단 (2005). 운전 중 주의분산 행동 유형화 및 위험성 분석. http://www.kotsa.or.kr/
2 McGehee, D. V., Brown, T. L., Lee, J. D., & Wilson, T. B. (2002). The effect of warning timing on collision avoidance behavior in a stationary lead vehicle scenario. In Human performance: Models, intelligent vehicle initiative, traveller advisory and information systems. 1-7 Washington DC: Transportation Research Board
3 삼성 교통안전 문화연구소 (2006). 운전 중 DMB 사용의 위험성 및 규제방안 연구보고서. http://sts. samsungfire.com
4 French, R. L. (1990). In-vehicle navigation - status and safety impacts. Technical Papers from ITE's 1990, 1989, and 1988 Conference, Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, DC, 226-235
5 신용균, 임평남, 강수철, 류준범. (2006). 운전 중 TV시청이 운전행동에 미치는 영향. 대한교통학회지, 24, 103-112
6 Liu, Y. C. (2001). Comparative study of the effects of auditory, visual and multimodality displays on drivers' performance in advanced traveler information systems. Ergonomics 44(4), 425-442   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
7 McEvoy, S. P., Stevenson, M. R., & Woodward, M. (2007). The contribution of passengers versus mobile phone use to motor vehicle crashes resulting in hospital attendance by the driver. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 39, 1170-1176   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Lee, J. D., McGehee, D. V., Brown, T. L., & Marshall, D. (2006). Effects of adaptive cruise control and alert modality on driver performance. Transportation Research Record, 1980, 49-56
9 Wierwille, W. W. (1995). Development of an initial model relating driver in-vehicle visual demands accident rate. Proceedings of the Third Annual Mid-Atlantic Human Factors Conference, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, 1-7
10 Zwhalen, H. T., Adams Jr., C. C., & DeBald, D. P. (1988). Safety aspects of CRT panel controls in automobiles. In: Gale, A. G., Freeman, M. H., Haslegrave, C. M., Smith, P., & Taylor, S. P. (Eds.), Vision in Vehicle Ⅱ. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 335-344
11 Redelmeier, D. A., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1997). Association Between Cellular Telephone Calls and Motor Vehicle Collisions. The New England journal of Medicine, 336, 453-458   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Calvert, G. A., Spence, C., & Stein, B. E. (Eds.) (2004) The handbook of multisensory processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
13 McKeown, J. D., & Isherwood, S. (2007). Mapping the urgency and pleasantness of speech, auditory icons, and abstract alarms to their referents within the vehicle. Human Factors, 49, 417-428   DOI   ScienceOn