Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.11003/JPNT.2022.11.3.163

A Comparison of Meta-learning and Transfer-learning for Few-shot Jamming Signal Classification  

Jin, Mi-Hyun (GNSS R&D Center, Danam Systems)
Koo, Ddeo-Ol-Ra (GNSS R&D Center, Danam Systems)
Kim, Kang-Suk (GNSS R&D Center, Danam Systems)
Publication Information
Journal of Positioning, Navigation, and Timing / v.11, no.3, 2022 , pp. 163-172 More about this Journal
Abstract
Typical anti-jamming technologies based on array antennas, Space Time Adaptive Process (STAP) & Space Frequency Adaptive Process (SFAP), are very effective algorithms to perform nulling and beamforming. However, it does not perform equally well for all types of jamming signals. If the anti-jamming algorithm is not optimized for each signal type, anti-jamming performance deteriorates and the operation stability of the system become worse by unnecessary computation. Therefore, jamming classification technique is required to obtain optimal anti-jamming performance. Machine learning, which has recently been in the spotlight, can be considered to classify jamming signal. In general, performing supervised learning for classification requires a huge amount of data and new learning for unfamiliar signal. In the case of jamming signal classification, it is difficult to obtain large amount of data because outdoor jamming signal reception environment is difficult to configure and the signal type of attacker is unknown. Therefore, this paper proposes few-shot jamming signal classification technique using meta-learning and transfer-learning to train the model using a small amount of data. A training dataset is constructed by anti-jamming algorithm input data within the GNSS receiver when jamming signals are applied. For meta-learning, Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning (MAML) algorithm with a general Convolution Neural Networks (CNN) model is used, and the same CNN model is used for transfer-learning. They are trained through episodic training using training datasets on developed our Python-based simulator. The results show both algorithms can be trained with less data and immediately respond to new signal types. Also, the performances of two algorithms are compared to determine which algorithm is more suitable for classifying jamming signals.
Keywords
jamming; meta-learning; transfer learning; classification;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Koch, G. 2015, Siamese neural networks for one-shot image recognition, M.S. Dissertation, University of Toronto
2 Moore, T. D. 2002, Analytic study of space-time and space-frequency adaptive processing for radio frequency interference suppression, PhD Dissertation, The Ohio State University.
3 Munkhdalai, T. & Yu, H. 2017, Meta netw orks, In Proceedings of the 34th International conference on machine learning, Sydney, Australia, 6-11 Aug 2017, PMLR, 70, pp.2554-2563
4 Ravi, S. & Larochelle, H. 2017, Optimization as a model for few-shot learning, In ICLR, Toulon, France, 24-26 Apr. 2017
5 Schmidt, R. 1986, Multiple emitter location and signal parameter estimation, IEEE transactions on antennas and propagation, 34, 276-280. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAP.1986.1143830   DOI
6 Ferre, R. M., da La Fuente, A., & Lohan, E. S. 2019, Jammer classification in GNSS bands via machine learning algorithms, Sensors, 19, 4841. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19224841   DOI
7 Smith, J. & Abel, J. 1987, Closed-form least-squares source lo-cation estimation from range-difference measurements, IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 35, 1661-1669. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASSP.1987.1165089   DOI
8 Wang, Y., Yao, Q., Kwok, J. T., & Ni, L. M. 2021, Generalizing from a few examples: A survey on few-shot learning, ACM Computing Surveys, 53, 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1145/3386252   DOI
9 Ward, J. 1994, Space-Time Adaptive Processing for Airborne Radar, Technical Report 1015, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Lincoln Laboratory
10 Jin, M. H., Koo, D. O. R., & Kim, K. S. 2021, Meta-learning Based Few-shot Jamming Signal Classification Technique, 2021 IPNT conference, Gangneung, Korea, 3-5 Nov 2021.
11 Gross, J. N. & Humphreys, T. E. 2017, GNSS spoofing, jamming, and multipath interference classification using a maximum-likelihood multi-tap multipath estimator, In Proceedings of the 2017 International Technical Meeting of the Institute of Navigation, Monterey, California, January 2017, pp.662-670. https://doi.org/10.33012/2017.14919   DOI
12 Jin, M. H., Choi, Y., Choi, H. H., & Lee, S. J. 2018, Jammer identification: spectral correlation function and wavelet coherence, Journal of Positioning, Navigation, and Timing, 7, 147-153. http://doi.org/10.11003/JPNT.2018.7.3.147   DOI
13 Kingma, D. P. & Ba, J. 2015, Adam: A method for stochastic optimization, In ICLR, San Diego, CA, USA, 7-9 May 2015. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1412.6980   DOI
14 Lee, Y. J., Lee, G. J., & Ra, S. W. 2019, A study on GPS jamming detection using support vector machine, Journal of KIIT, 17, 11-20. https://doi.org/10.14801/jkiit.2019.17.1.11   DOI
15 Yoo, S. S. 2020, An improved GNSS jamming classification scheme using convolutional neural network, Journal of Institute of Control, Robotics and Systems, 26, 1016-1027. http://doi.org/10.5302/J.ICROS.2020.20.0112   DOI
16 Pan, S. J. & Yang, Q. 2010, A survey on transfer learning, IEEE Transactions on knowledge and data engineering, 22, 1345-1359. https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2009.191   DOI
17 Santoro, A., Bartunov, S., Botvinick, M., Wierstra, D., & Lillicrap, T. 2016, Meta-learning with memory-augmente d neural netw orks, In International conference on machine learning, PMLR, New York, USA, 20-22 Jun 2016, 48, pp.1842-1850. https://proceedings.mlr.press/v48/santoro16.html
18 Settles, B. 2009, Active learning literature sur vey, Computer Sciences Technical Report 1648, University of Wisconsin-Madison. http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1793/60660
19 Vinyals, O., Blundell, C., Lillicrap, T., Kavukcuoglu, K., & Wierstra, D. 2016, Matching networks for one shot learning, In NIPS, Barcelona, Spain, 5-10 Dec. 2016
20 Bazec, M. & Dimc, F. 2018, GNSS Jammer detection, classification and spectrum analysis, In Proceeding of the International Conference on Transport Science, Portoroz, Slovenia, 14-15 June 2018.
21 He, H. & Garcia, E. A. 2009, Learning from imbalanced data, IEEE Transactions on knowledge and data engineering, 21, 1263-1284. https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2008.239   DOI
22 Fadaei, N. 2016, Detection, characterization and mitigation of GNSS jamming interference using pre-correlation methods, PhD Dissertation, University of Calgary. https://doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/25598   DOI
23 Finn, C., Abbeel, P., & Levine, S. 2017, Model-agnostic meta-learning for fast adaptation of deep networks, In Proceedings of the 34th International conference on machine learning, Sydney, Australia, 6-11 Aug 2017, PMLR, 70, pp.1126-1135. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1703.03400   DOI