Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.11003/JPNT.2015.4.1.033

Performance Analysis of Low-Order Surface Methods for Compact Network RTK: Case Study  

Song, Junesol (Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering and the Institute of Advanced Aerospace Technology, Seoul National University)
Park, Byungwoon (Department of Aerospace Engineering, Sejong University)
Kee, Changdon (Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering and the Institute of Advanced Aerospace Technology, Seoul National University)
Publication Information
Journal of Positioning, Navigation, and Timing / v.4, no.1, 2015 , pp. 33-41 More about this Journal
Abstract
Compact Network Real-Time Kinematic (RTK) is a method that combines compact RTK and network RTK, and it can effectively reduce the time and spatial de-correlation errors. A network RTK user receives multiple correction information generated from reference stations that constitute a network, calculates correction information that is appropriate for one's own position through a proper combination method, and uses the information for the estimation of the position. This combination method is classified depending on the method for modeling the GPS error elements included in correction information, and the user position accuracy is affected by the accuracy of this modeling. Among the GPS error elements included in correction information, tropospheric delay is generally eliminated using a tropospheric model, and a combination method is then applied. In the case of a tropospheric model, the estimation accuracy varies depending on the meteorological condition, and thus eliminating the tropospheric delay of correction information using a tropospheric model is limited to a certain extent. In this study, correction information modeling accuracy performances were compared focusing on the Low-Order Surface Model (LSM), which models the GPS error elements included in correction information using a low-order surface, and a modified LSM method that considers tropospheric delay characteristics depending on altitude. Both of the two methods model GPS error elements in relation to altitude, but the second method reflects the characteristics of actual tropospheric delay depending on altitude. In this study, the final residual errors of user measurements were compared and analyzed using the correction information generated by the various methods mentioned above. For the performance comparison and analysis, various GPS actual measurement data were collected. The results indicated that the modified LSM method that considers actual tropospheric characteristics showed improved performance in terms of user measurement residual error and position domain residual error.
Keywords
network RTK; RTK; low-order surface methods; tropospheric delay;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Gao, Y., Li, Z., & McLellan, J. F. 1997, Carrier phase based regional area differential GPS for decimeter-level positioning and navigation, in the 10th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation, Kansas City, MO, 16-19 Sep 1997, pp.1305-1313.
2 Park, B. & Kee, C. 2010, The Compact Network RTK Method: An Effective Solution to Reduce GNSS Temporal and Spatial Decorrelation Error, Journal of Navigation, 63, 343-362. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0373463309990440   DOI
3 Schaer, S., Beutler, G., Rothacher, M., Brockmann, E., Wiget, A., et al. 1999, The impact of the atmosphere and other systematic errors on permanent GPS networks, in IAG Symposium on Positioning, Birmingham, UK. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59742-8_61
4 Song, J., Park, B., & Kee, C. 2014, Comparative Analysis of Height-Related Multiple Correction Interpolation Methods with Constraints for Network RTK in Mountainous Area, Journal of Survey Engineering, submitted.
5 Varner, C. C. 2000, DGPS Carrier Phase Networks and Partial Derivative Algorithms, PhD Dissertation, University of Calgary.
6 Wanninger, L. 1995, Improved Ambiguity Resolution by Regional Differential Modelling of the Ionosphere, in the 8th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation, Palm Springs, CA, 12-15 Sep 1995, pp.55-62.
7 Bean, B. R. & Dutton, E. J. 1966, Radio Meteorology, National Bureau of Standards Monograph 92, Boulder, Colorado (Washington: US Government Print Office)
8 Black, H. D. & Eisner, A. 1984, Correcting satellite Doppler data for tropospheric effects, JGR, 89(D2), 2616-2626. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/JD089iD02p02616   DOI
9 Collins, J. P. & Langley, R. B. 1999, Nominal and extreme error performance of the UNB3 tropospheric delay model, Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering Technical Report No. 204. University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada.
10 Dai, L., Han, S., Wang, J., & Rizos, C. 2003, Comparison of Interpolation Algorithms in Network-Based GPS Techniques, Navigation, 50, 277-293. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-4296.2003.tb00335.x   DOI
11 Euler, H. J., Keenan, R., & Zebhauser, B. 2001, Study of a Simplified Approach in Utilizing Information from Permanent Reference Station Arrays, the 14th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation, Salt Lake, UT, Sep 2001, pp.379-391.
12 Fotopoulos, G. & Cannon, M. E. 2001, An Overview of Multi-Reference Station Methods for Cm-Level Positioning, GPS Solutions, 4, 1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/PL00012849