Browse > Article

Uncertainty Analysis of a Coastal Physical Model in Gyeonggi Bay and Han River Estuary  

Kim, Jeong-Dae (Division Civil, Environmental and Urban Engineering, Wonkwang University)
Jeong, Shin-Taek (Division Civil, Environmental and Urban Engineering, Wonkwang University)
Cho, Hong-Yeon (Coastal Development Research Department, KORDI)
Jung, Kyung-Tae (Coastal Development Research Department, KORDI)
Ko, Dong-Hui (Division Civil, Environmental and Urban Engineering, Wonkwang University)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Society of Coastal and Ocean Engineers / v.20, no.3, 2008 , pp. 321-331 More about this Journal
Abstract
A model has been constructed in this study for the investigation of physical characteristics of the Gyeonggi Bay and Han River estuary. MIKE 21 HD (HyDrodynamics) has been used for the uncertainty analysis of the tide of the Gyeonngi Bay and Han River estuary. A total of 15 model experiments have been performed for the hydrodynamic parts and the analysis of results have been made in terms of RMSD (Root-mean square deviation) which has been frequently employed in the suitability analysis of hydrological data since the introduction by NERC(1975), U.K. A smaller value of RMSD indicates the more suitability of a parameter to the model. Analysis of the hydrodynamic results has shown that RMSD of the mean tidal range has the largest value of 0.1148 at Yeomha channel while has the smallest value of 0.0400 at Yeonphyong-do, indicating that the uncertainty in the mean tidal range on near-shore side is larger than that of offshore side. Experiment with reduced water depth by 10% has produced a most significant increase in RMSD. It is therefore implied that the model response changes more sensitively to water depth rather than grid sizes, open boundary forcing and river discharge.
Keywords
Gyeonggi bay; Han river estuary; MIKE21; tide; RMSD;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Natural Environment Research Council(NREC) (1975). Flood Studies Report, Vol. 1-5. NERC, London, pp. 1100
2 이종찬 (2006). 2006년 5월 29일 전자메일교신(jclee@kordi.re.kr), 한국해양연구원
3 성동권 (2003). 격자자료의 리샘플링에 따른 불확실성 정량 화 및 해석에 관한 연구, 박사학위논문, 전북대학교
4 Loucks, D.P. and Beek, E. (2005). Water Resources Systems Planning and Management, UNESCO and WL/Delft Hydraulics
5 이승욱, 김영오, 이동률 (2005). 물수지 분석을 위한 불확실성 정량화, 한국수자원학회논문집 제38권 제4호, pp. 281-292   과학기술학회마을   DOI
6 Faragher, J. (2004). Probabilistic Methods for the Quantification of Uncertainty and Error in Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations, Tech. Report DSTO-TR-1633, DSTO Platforms Sciences Laboratory
7 Brown, L.C. and Barnwell, Jr. T.O. (1987). The Enhanced Stream Water Quality Models QUAL2E and QUAL2EUNCAS, Environmental Research Laboratory Office of Research and Development U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Athens, Georgia
8 Upmanu Lall, Donald L. Phillips, Kenneth H. Reckhow and Daniel P. Loucks(Chair) (2002). Quantifying and Communicating Model Uncertainty for Decision Making in the Everglades, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers South Florida Water Management District West Palm Beach, FL
9 정참삼, 허준행, 배덕효 (2004). 국내 유역에 대한 GCM 정 보의 확률론적 불확실성 분석, 한국수자원학회논문집 제 37권 제2호, pp. 173-184
10 Isukapalli, S.S. (1999). Uncertainty Analysis of Transport- Transformation Models, New Brunswick, New Jersey