Browse > Article

Numerical Analysis of Nonlinear Shoaling Characteristics over Surf Zone Using SPH and Lagrangian Dynamic Smagronsky Model  

Cho, Yong-Jun (Department of Civil Engineering, University of Seoul)
Lee, Heon (Department of Civil Engineering, University of Seoul)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Society of Coastal and Ocean Engineers / v.19, no.1, 2007 , pp. 81-96 More about this Journal
Abstract
Nonlinear shoaling characteristics over surf zone are numerically investigated based on spatially averaged NavierStokes equation. We also test the validity of gradient model for turbulent stresses due to wave breaking using the data acquainted during SUPERTANK LABORATORY DATA COLLECTION PROJECT(Krauss et al., 1992). It turns out that the characteristics length scale of breaking induced current is not negligible, which firmly stands against ever popular gradient model, ${\kappa}-{\varepsilon}$ model, but favors Large Eddy Simulation with finer grid. Based on these observations, we model the residual stress of spatially averaged NavierStokes equation after Lagrangian Dynamic Smagorinsky(Meneveau et al., 1996). We numerically integrate newly proposed wave equations using SPH with Gaussian kernel function. Severely deformed water surface profile, free falling water particle, queuing splash after landing of water particle on the free surface and wave finger due to structured vortex on rear side of wave crest(Narayanaswamy and Dalrymple, 2002) are successfully duplicated in the numerical simulation of wave propagation over uniform slope beach, which so far have been regarded very difficult features to mimic in the computational fluid mechanics.
Keywords
smooth particle hydrodynamics(SPH); Lagrangian Dynamic Smagronsky model(LDS); plunging type wave breaking; surf similarity parameter; sub particle scale stress; Navier Stokes equation;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Batchelor, G.K., 1967. An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK
2 Dean, R.G. and Dalrymple, R.A., 1991. Water wave mechanics for engineers and scientists, World Scientific
3 Kraus, N.C., Smith, J.M. and Sollitt, C.K., 1992. SUPERTANK laboratory data Collection project, Proceedings of the 23rd Coastal Engineering Conference, ASCE, 2191-2204
4 Menevenau, C., Lund, T.S. and Cabot, W. H., 1996. A Lagrangian dynamic subgridscale model of turbulence. Journal of Fluid Mech., Vol. 319, 353-385   DOI
5 Narayanaswamy, M. and Dalrymple, R.A., 2002. An experimental study of surface instabilities during wave breaking. Proc. of 28th ICCE, ASCE, 344-355
6 Pope, Stephen B., 2004. Ten questions concerning the largeeddy simulation of turbulent flows. New Journal of Physics, Vol. 6, No. 35, 1-24   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Rodi, Wolfgang, 1993. Turbulence models and their application in hydraulics a state of art review, International Association for Hydraulic Research, Delft, 3rd edition 1993, Balkema
8 Smagorincky, J., 1963. General circulation experiments with primitive equations, I. the Basic Experiment, Monthly Weather Review, Vol. 91, 99-164   DOI
9 Airy, G.B., 1945. Tides and waves. Encycl. Metrop., Section VI
10 Gingold, A. and Monaghan, J.J., 1977. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics: theory and application to nonspherical stars, Mon. Not. R. Astr. Soc. 181, 375-389   DOI
11 Veeramony, J. and Svendsen, I. A., 1999. Modeling the flow in surf zone waves. Research Report NO. CACR9904, Center for applied coastal research, Univ. of Delaware, Newark, Delaware
12 Komar, P.D., 1976. Beach processes and sedimentation, Prentice Hall
13 Morris, J.P., Fox, P.J. and Zhu, Y., 1997. Modeling low Reynolds number incompressible flows using SPH. Journal of Computational Physics 136, 214-226   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Yoshizawa, A., 1986. Statistical theory for compressible turbulent shear flows with application to subgrid modeling, Physics of Fluids A 29, 2152-2164   DOI
15 GomezGesteira, M., Cerqueiro, D., Crespo, C. and Dalrymple, R.A., 2005. Green water overtopping analyzed with a SPH medel, Ocean Engineering, Vol. 32, 223-238   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Lucy, L.B., 1977. A numerical approach to the testing of the fission hypothesis. Astronomical Journal 82, 10131024
17 Tennekes, H., and Lumley, J. L., 1992. A first course in turbulence, The MIT Press, Cambridge
18 Kolmogorov, A.N., 1942. The equations of turbulent motion in an incompressible fluid. Izvestia Acad. Sci., USSR; Phys., 6, 56-58
19 Dalrymple, R.A. and Knio, O., 2000. SPH Modeling of water waves, Proc. Coastal Dynm., Lund 2000
20 Germano, M., Piomelli, U., Moin, P. and Cabot, W.H., 1991. A dynamic subgridscale eddy viscosity model, Phys. Fluids, A3, 1760-1765
21 Takeda, H., Shoken, M. M, and Minoru, Sekiya, 1994. Numerical simulation of viscous flow by smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Progress in Theoretical Physics 92, 939-959   DOI
22 Peregrine, D.H. and Svendsen, I.A., 1978. Spilling breakers, bores and hydraulic jumps. Proc. of 16th ICCE, ASCE, 540-550
23 Dalrymple, R.A., Knio, O., Cox, D.T., GomezGesteira, M. and Zou, S., 2001. Using a Lagrangian particle method for deck overtopping, Proc. Waves, ASCE , 1082-1091
24 Dalrymple, R.A. and Rogers, B.D., 2006. Numerical modeling of water waves with the SPH method, Coastal Engineering, Vol. 53, 141-147   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Elgar S., Gallagher E.L. and Guza R.T., 2001. Nearshore sandbar migration. Journal of Geophysical Research., Vol. 106, 11,623-11,627
26 Monaghan J.J., 1994. Simulating free surface flows with SPH. Journal of Computational Physics 110, 399-406   DOI   ScienceOn