Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7837/kosomes.2021.27.2.256

Legal Status and Major Issue of Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships (MASS) in International Law  

Chun, Jung-soo (Korea Maritime & Ocean University)
Park, Han-seon (Maritime Safety Department/Maritime Industry & Safety Division of Korea Maritime Institute)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society of Marine Environment & Safety / v.27, no.2, 2021 , pp. 256-265 More about this Journal
Abstract
Ground, sea and air mobility, such as vehicles, ships, and airplanes, are generally operated by people. Based on the innovative development of autonomous decision-making systems and artificial intelligence (AI) following the recent fourth industrial revolution, research and development on maritime autonomous surface ships (MASS) is been actively performed around the world. Before the realization of the commercialization of MASS in international maritime transport, it is urgent to clarify the characteristics of this ship and its international legal status. This paper aims to analyze the concern of whether a ship without crew members will eventually be operated as a fully unmanned ship or can be recognized as a ship under international law as the number of crew members is gradually reduced owing to the development stage of autonomous ships. Consequently, based on the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) and the regulations of the International Maritime Organization (IMO), it was found that MASS has the same international legal status as general ships. In addition this paper presents the working principles of enacting and revising the IMO Conventions and international legal measures necessary for the safe operation of MASS.
Keywords
Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships (MASS); UNCLOS; Maritime Law; IMO; Master; Crew; Remote Operator;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 IMO H.P.(2020), https://www.imo.org/en/About/HistoryOfIMO/Pages/Default.aspx.
2 IMO, MSC 99th Session(2018), Regulatory Scoping Exercise for the Use of Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships (MASS): Comments and Proposals on the way forward for the regulatory, Submitted by IFSMA and ITF (MSC 99/5/1), p. 2.
3 IMSAS H.P.(2020), https://www.imo.org/en/OurWork/MSAS.
4 Kim, C. I. and G. S. Park(2018), A Study on the Roadmap to Develop Unmanned Autonomous Vehicle Systems for the Republic of Korea Navy, Journal of the Korea Naval Academy Maritime Institute, Vol. 51, pp. 31-39.
5 KMI(1997), Research Report on FAL Acceptance Plan, pp. 3-4.
6 KMI(2020a), IMO International Maritime Policy Trends, Vol. 42, pp. 2-6.
7 KMI(2020b), IMO International Maritime Policy Trends, Vol. 47, pp. 2-5.
8 Lim, Y. J. and Y. C. Lee(2018), Issues of IMO Convention of Maritime Autonomous Surface Ship and Its Implications on the Application of Maritime, Law Review, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 166-167.
9 Lee, C. H.(2017), Introduction to Shipbuilding Engineering, pp. 7-9/63-83.
10 MARPOL H.P.(2020), https://www.imo.org/en/About/Conventions/Pages/International-Convention-for-the-Prevention-of-Pollutionfrom-Ships-(MARPOL).aspx.
11 MOFA H.P.(2021), https://www.mofa.go.kr/www/wpge/m-3834/contents.do.
12 Kimst(2019), Results of Technology Impact Assessment for MASS, pp. 68-73.
13 MUNIN H.P.(2018), https://www.unmanned_ship.org/munin/about/the_autonomous_ship.
14 Chong, D. Y.(2006), A Study on the Municipal Response Plan for the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Maritime Navigation, 2005, Maritime Law Review Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 310-316.
15 STCW H.P.(2020), https://www.imo.org/en/About/Conventions/Pages/International-Convention-on-Standards-of-Training,-Certification-and-Watchkeeping-for-Seafarers-(STCW).aspx.
16 Oh, B. C.(2020), Framework for Legal Personhood of Artificial Intelligence Robot, Korean Lawyers Association Journal, Vol. 69, No. 3, pp. 51-55.
17 PSC H.P.(2020), https://www.imo.org/en/OurWork/MSAS/Pages/PortStateControl.aspx.
18 SOLAS H.P.(2020), https://www.imo.org/en/About/Conventions/Pages/International-Convention-for-the-Safety-of-Life-at-Sea-(SOLAS),-1974.aspx.
19 UNCLOS H.P.(2020), https://www.un.org/Depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/closindx.htm.
20 Yang, S. W.(2011), A Study on the Legal Issues on the FIO Clause: Comparison in the Rotterdam Rules with in the Hague-Visby Rules, Journal of Business Administration & Law, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 403-405.
21 CMI(2020), CMI International Working Group Position Paper on Unmanned Ships and the International Regulatory framework, http://www.commitmaritime.org/Upleads/Questionnaires/CM.
22 Choi, J. H. and S. I. Lee(2016), A Study on the Legal Considerations and Major Issues of Unmanned Commercial Ship, Maritime Law Review, Vol. 28, No. 3, p. 317.
23 COLREGs H.P.(2020), https://www.imo.org/en/About/Conventions/Pages/COLREG.aspx.
24 Deketelaere, P.(2017), The legal challenges of unmanned vessels, Master of Science in Maritime Science Master Dissertation (Universiteit Gent, 2017), pp. 9-11.
25 EU Parliament(2017), European Parliament resolution of 16 February 2017 with recommendations to the Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics (2015/2103(INL)).
26 KMC(2021), IMO Introduction, https://www.imokorea.org/imo/imo_summary.asp
27 BLD(2016), Black's Law Dictionary Free Online Legal Dictionary 2nd Ed., http://thelawditionary.org/vessel.