Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7837/kosomes.2018.24.6.701

Analysis of Bridge Team's Technical Behavior Pattern Appearing in Williamson's Turn  

Yun, Chong-gum (Korea Coast Guard Academy, Graduated school of Mokpo National Maritime University)
Park, Deuk-Jin (Korea Coast Guard Academy, Graduated school of Mokpo National Maritime University)
Yim, Jeong-Bin (Division of Navigation Science, Korea Maritime and Ocean University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society of Marine Environment & Safety / v.24, no.6, 2018 , pp. 701-708 More about this Journal
Abstract
Human error is an important cause of maritime accidents and the identification of human error is fundamental to maritime-accident preventions. In particular, the pattern of technical behavior taken in the circumstance of bridge teams(navigator & helmsman) provides important information to identify human error. The purpose of this study is to identify and analyze technical behavior pattern of bridge teams using Williamson's turn for rescue of persons overboard. The focus of this study is to build and analyze a cognitive model of the human behavior factors of the bridge teams in the process of implementing the experiments. The experimental environment was constructed using a ship-handling simulator and conducted an experiment on participants from 24 bridge teams. As a result of the experiment, it was able to identify the behavior pattern of the ship's maneuvering and maintain trajectory using the rudder and engine. This study is expected to correct human error in the bridge teams application to the certification and training of seafarers.
Keywords
Human error; Bridge team; Technical behavior pattern; Williamson's turn; Course tracking;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Bertel, S., T. Dressel, T. Kohlberg and V. von Jan(2017), Spatial knowledge acquired from pedestrian urban navigation systems, In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, p. 32.
2 Cacciabue P. C.(1997), A methodology of human factors analysis for system engineering: theory and application, Part A, 27(3), pp. 325-326.   DOI
3 Castells Sanabra, M., S. Ordas Jimenez, C. Barahona Fuentes, J. Moncunill Marimon, C. Muyskens, W. Hofman, S. Cross, A. Kondratiev, A. Boran-Keshishyan, A. Popov and S. Skorokhodov(2014), Simulation-based model course to demonstrate seafarers' competence for deck officers' discipline, In Maritime transport VI: 6th International Conference on Maritime Transport: maritime transport '14, pp. 318-331.
4 Inoue, K.(2013), Theory and Practice of Ship Handling, Kobe university, pp. 25-29.
5 Itoh, K., T. Yamaguchi, J. P. Hansen and F. R. Nielsen(2001), Risk Analysis of Ship Navigation by Use of Cognitive Simulation, Cognition, Technology & Work 3, pp. 4-21.   DOI
6 Kim, H. T., S. Na and W. H. Ha(2011), A Case Study of Marine accident Investigation and Analysis with focus on Human Error, Journal of the ergonomics society of Korea, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 137-150.   DOI
7 KIMFT(2010), IAMSAR Manual Vol. III 2010, Haein publisher, pp. 350-357.
8 KMST(2017), Statical Year Book for Maritime Accident, Korean Maritime Safety Tribunals (KMST).
9 Yun, C. G. and D. B. Kim(2016), The Consideration on Change of ship's trajectory in case-by-case initial response to cognitive Situation by SHS, KINPR, Spring Conference in Busan, pp. 199-201.