Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7837/kosomes.2018.24.1.010

Analysis of Effect of the Ship's Route Exchange through the Ship Handling Simulation  

Paek, Yun-Ji (Graduate School, Mokpo National Maritime University)
Jung, Chang-Hyun (Division of Navigation Science, Mokpo National Maritime University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society of Marine Environment & Safety / v.24, no.1, 2018 , pp. 10-17 More about this Journal
Abstract
To prepare the integrated safety management system 'e-navigation', research is being conducted on the route exchange for sharing intended routes between ship and ship, and between ship and land. But they don't have enough specific grounds for the effects of route exchange and the necessity of its introduction and focus on technical aspects like the implementation of route exchange. This study tried to quantitatively analyze the effects of route exchange on sailing safety with the use of ship handling simulation, integrate simulation performers' subjective evaluations, and investigate the effects of route exchange. The ship-to-ship route exchange resulted in the initial collision avoidance action time was 3.43 minutes faster, the collision avoidance direction change rate was 60 %, the proximity to target A was 31 %, and Mean Rudder Angle Index decreased by 57 %. In addition, 95 % of the survey respondents had an effect on the decision making of collision avoidance, 85 % had a positive impact on safety navigation, 90 % had an accident prevention effect, 70 % reduced the psychological burden of officers, and 70 % should be introduced in practice.
Keywords
e-navigation; Route exchange; Ship Handling Simulation; Safety; Psychological burden; Accident prevention;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 IALA(2012), MonaLisa Project, Testbed 1: Dynamic and proactive route planning, http://academy.iala-aism.org/products -projects/e-navigation/test-bedsprojects/monalisa-1/ (Accessed Aug 2016).
2 IMO(1972), International Regulations for Preventing Collision at Sea 1972.
3 IMO(2008), Strategy for the Development and Implementation of e-navigation, MSC 85/26/Add.1, pp. 1-15.
4 Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries(2015), 2015 Coastal Traffic Map, pp. 18-19.
5 MonaLisa Project(2012), Concept for Activity 1: Dynamic & Proactive Routes or "Green-Routes", Concept Paper Act.1, pp.4-8, http://www.sjofartsverket.se/en/MonaLisa/Archive/Activity -1---Dynamic--Proactive-Route-planning/ (Accessed Aug 2016).
6 Wilske, E. and O. Lexell(2011), Test bed for Evaluation of Methods for Decision Support in Collision Avoidance, e-Navigation Underway, International Conference on e-Navigation, pp. 72-85.
7 ACCSEAS Project(2015), Tactical Exchange of Intended Routes, EVAV17-10.5.8, pp. 7-12, http://www.accseas.eu/publ ications/ (Accessed Aug 2016).
8 Arkadiusz Tomczak, Paweł Zalewski, and Rafal Gralak(2012), Simulation Analysis of ECDIS's Route Exchange Functionality Impact on Navigation Safety, Annual of navigation, pp. 109-120.
9 EfficienSea Project(2011), Development of an e-navigation stratagy implementation plan, COMSAR 16/INF.2, p. 9.