Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7837/kosomes.2011.17.1.053

Assessment of Port Development Priority with Conflicts among Decision Makers -From the Perspective of Environment-friendly Port Development-  

Jang, Woon-Jae (Maritime Safety Research Center, Korea Ship Safety Technology Authority)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society of Marine Environment & Safety / v.17, no.1, 2011 , pp. 53-60 More about this Journal
Abstract
In this study, the priority was assessed and the compensation relationships were analyzed with regard to the issue of port development with conflicts among decision makers. First, the assessment factors were selected by the relevant literatures on port development, and fuzzy structure modeling was used to select assessment factors via structuralization analysis. Second, the local residents, port users, and local government were chosen as the main port-development related entities, and the analytic hierarchy process was used to calculate the total assessment value. Third, the justice based on majority power rule method was used as an assessment method that would minimize the amount of complaints according to the total assessment results and the alternative selection when a partnership was formed among the assessment entities. Moreover, the compensation issue according to the alternative selection was quantified, and the compensation relationships were analyzed. As a result, it was found that port development in Busan must be the top priority in terms of port development in South Korea, that awareness of environmental issues must be promoted among the port users, and that the local governments must promote environmental incentive policies for Environment-friendly port development.
Keywords
Port development; FSM(Fuzzy Structure Modeling); AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process); JMPR(Justice based on Majority Power Rule); Compensation relationship;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Baek, I. H., S. H. Moon(2005), A Study on Deciding Port Development Priority, Journal of Korean navigation and port research, Vol.29, No.8, pp. 701-707.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Eiichiro, T., A. Michio(1979), Structural modeling in a class of systems using fuzzy sets theory, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Volume 2, Issue 1, January 1979, pp. 87-103.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Kim, S. J., K. D. Lee, G. I. Cho, D. K. Ryoo(2009), The Motivation of the Strategic Alliance between Ports Using AHP, Journal of Korean navigation and port research, Vol. 33, No. 7, pp. 483-490.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Nabatame, A.(2005), A game theory and evolution dynamics, Moriki publication. pp. 351-355.
5 Nagao,Y.(1984), Settlement Method about Group, Interest and Conflicts in Civil Facility Plans, Kyoto Univ. pp. 12-29.
6 Nakamura, H.(1997), Socioeconomic Evaluation on Road Investment Projects, Toyo Keizai Inc. pp. 240-242.
7 Rawls, J.(1957), Justice as fairness, philosophical review, Vol. 67, pp. 1164-1194.
8 Schemidler, D.(1969), The nucleolus of a characteristic function game, SIAM, Journal of applied mathematics. Vol.17, No. 6, pp. 1163-1170.
9 Suzuki, M. and N. Mikio.(1976), The cost assignment of the cooperative water resource development-A game theoretic approach, Management Science, Vol. 22, No. 10, pp. 1081-1086.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Suzuki, M., S. Muto(1981), The idea of the cooperative game. Toyko Univ. Publication, pp. 23-42.
11 Yang, W., C. Y. Lee(1999), On the Effect of ON-DOCK System to the Sharpening of Competitiveness Edge of the Pusan Port, Journal of Korean port research, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 1-7.
12 Yang, W. J.(2003), Structure Analysis of Ship′s Collision Causes using Fuzzy Structural Modeling, Journal of Korean navigation and port research, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 137-143.   DOI   ScienceOn