Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7837/kosomes.2011.17.1.047

Coastal State's Jurisdiction over Suspected Vessels on the High Seas - In relation to the case of F/V Jin Yinn in USA -  

Kim, Jong-Goo (College of Law, Chosun University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society of Marine Environment & Safety / v.17, no.1, 2011 , pp. 47-52 More about this Journal
Abstract
On the high seas, under international law, a ship is subject to the jurisdiction of the state whose flag she flies. Vessels of any flag are free to navigate the high seas without interference from other states. Thus, there are certain limits of coastal state's exercising law enforcement jurisdiction over a foreign flag vessel on the high seas. However, there are exceptions to exclusive flag state jurisdiction. One of them is the theory of constructive presence. The other is theory of partial execution. Korea Coast Guard's law enforcement authority should be exercised more actively based on those theories supported by the international cases.
Keywords
Flag-state jurisdiction; Freedom of navigation; Constructive presence; Coastal state's jurisdiction; Right of hot pursuit; High seas;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 김대순(2006), 국제법론(제12판), 삼영사, p. 863.
2 김영구(2004), 한국과 바다의 국제법(신판), 21세기북스, p. 105.
3 김종구(2007), "접속수역, 배타적 경제수역 및 공해상에서의 형법의 역외적용", 법학연구(한국법학회), 제26집, p. 264.
4 배종대(2005), 형법총론(제8전정판), 홍문사, p. 135
5 변종필(2005), "밀항범죄의 현황과 대책", 비교형사법연, 제7권, 제2호, 한국비교형사법학회, p. 267.
6 오영근(2007), 형법총론(보정판), 박영사, p. 79
7 이석용(2003), 국제법(3정판), 세창출판사, p. 374.
8 이윤철(2006a), "개정 SUA협약의 국제법적 문제점", 2006년도 한국마린엔지니어링학회, 전기학술대회논문집, p. 117.
9 이윤철(2006b), "해상테러의 국제법적 규제 및 국내적 대응방안", 2006년 해양환경안전학회, 추계발표회논문집, p. 95.
10 이재상(2009), 형법총론(제6판), 박영사, p. 43
11 이형국(2007), 형법총론(제4판), 법문사, p 43.
12 임웅(2009), 형법총론(개정판 제2보정), 법문사, p. 59.
13 채이식(2005), "The Revision of the SUA Conventions - A Brief look ahead by a Maritime Lawyer -", 한국해법학회지, 29권, 1호, pp. 167-186.
14 최석윤(2011), ""해적행위에 대한 형사법적 대응방안", 형사법연구, 제22권, 제4호, p. 217.
15 Bardin, Anne(2002), "Coastal States Jurisdiction Over Foreign Vessels", Pace International Law Review, Vol. 14, p. 37.
16 Ostrom, P. Thomas (2006), The United States Coast Guard: 1790 to the Present, p. 137.
17 Barry, Patric Ian(2004), "The Right of Visit, Search and Seizure of Foreign Flagged Vessels on the High Seas Pursuant to Customary International Law: A Defense of the Proliferation Security Initiative", Hofstra Law Review, Vol. 33, p. 305.
18 Canty, Rachel(1999), "Limits of Coast Guard Authority to Board Foreign Flag Vessels on the High Seas", Tulane Maritime Law Journal, Vol. 23, pp. 134-136.
19 Ficken(1975), The 1935 Anti-Smuggling Act Applied to Hovering Narcotics Smugglers Beyond the Contiguous Zone: An Assessment Under International Law, University of Miami Law Review, Vol. 29, p. 700.
20 Postulanza, M. Nicholas(2002), The Right of Hot Pursuit in International Law(2판), Martinus Mijhoff Publishers, p. 71.
21 Raulin, De Arnauld(1997), La Repression dans les Eausx Internationales, in XV Annuaire De Droit Maritime Et Oceanique, pp. 214-216.
22 Reuland, C. Robert(1993), The Customary Right of Hot Pursuit Onto the High Seas: Annotation to Article 111 of the Law of the Sea, Virginia Journal of International Law, Vol. 33, pp. 557-589.
23 林 司宣(2000), 公海上の船泊に對する旗國以外の國による取締り, 早稻田法學 75卷2号, pp. 105-112.
24 Spinelli, Lawrence(2007), Dry Diplomacy: The United States, Great Britain, and Prohibition, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, p. 17.
25 Strati, Anastasia, Maria Gavouneli, Nikolaos Skourtos(2006), Unsolved Issues and New Challenges to the Law of the Sea, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, pp. 149-158.