Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.26748/KSOE.2018.2.32.1.068

Implementation of Heading Angle and Depth Keeping Control of ROV with Multiple Thrusters by Thrust Allocation  

Yoon, Suk-Min (Marine Robotics Laboratory, KRISO)
Lee, Chong-Moo (Marine Robotics Laboratory, KRISO)
Kim, Kihun (Marine Robotics Laboratory, KRISO)
Publication Information
Journal of Ocean Engineering and Technology / v.32, no.1, 2018 , pp. 68-75 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study deals with the heading angle and depth keeping control technique for an ROV with multiple horizontal and vertical thrusters by thrust allocation. The light work class ROV URI-L, which is under development at KRISO, is a redundant actuating system with multiple thrusters that are larger than the ROV's degree of freedom. In the redundant actuating system, there are several solutions for a specific ROV motion to be performed. Therefore, a thrust allocation algorithm that considers the entire propulsion system should be regarded as important. First, this paper describes the propulsion system of the ROV and introduces the thrust allocation method of each motion controller. In addition, the performance of the controller is examined using a heading angle and depth keeping control test in a stationary state.
Keywords
Light work class ROV; Thrust allocation; Thruster configuration matrix; Redundant actuating system; Propulsion system;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Yoon, S.M., Lee, C.M., Kim, K.H., Kim, S.M., Byun, S.H., Moon, Y.S., 2017. Motion Control of a Light-work-class ROV for Underwater Working: Heading and Depth Control. Proceedings of Fall Conference of the Korean Society of Ocean Engineers 2017, Busan, 244-247.
2 Garus, J., 2004, Optimization of Thrust Allocation in the Propulsion System of an Underwater Vehicle. International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, 14(4), 461-467.
3 Harkegard, O., Glad, T., 2005. Resolving Actuator Redundancy-optimal Control vs. Control Allocation. Automatica, 41(1), 137-144.   DOI
4 Henrik, J., 2005, Optimal Thruster Actuation in High Precision Attitude and Orbit Control Systems. Master of Science Programme in Space Engineering, Lulae University of Technology.
5 Ji, S.W., Kim, Y.B., 2012. Control Allocation and Controller Design for Marine Vessel based on $H{\infty}$ Control Approach. Journal of Ocean Engineering and Technology, 26(3), 20-25.   DOI
6 Johansen, T.A., Fossen, T.I., 2013. Control Allocation - A Survey. Automatica, 49(5), 1087-1103.   DOI
7 Lee, C.M., Kim, K.H., Yoon, S.M., Kim, S.M., Byun, S.H., Moon, Y.S., 2017. A Fundamental Test of The Underwater Construction Light Work Class ROV. Proceedings of Fall Conference of the Korean Society of Ocean Engineers 2017, Busan, 231-235.
8 Oppenheimer, M.W., Doman, D.B., 2007. A Method for Including Control Effector Interaction in The Control Allocation Problems. AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference and Exhibit.
9 Pedrami, R., Wijenddra, S., Baxter, J., Gordon, B.W., 2009. A Control Allocation Approach for Energetic Swarm Control. American Control Conference, 5079-5084.
10 Shen, Q., Wang, D., Zhu, S., Poh, E.K., 2017. Robust Control Allocation for Spacecraft Attitude Tracking Under Actuator Faults. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 25(3), 1068-1075.   DOI
11 Whitcomb, L.L., Yoerger, D.R., 1999. Preliminary Experiments in Model-based Thruster Control for Underwater Vehicle Positioning. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 24(4), 495-506.   DOI
12 Berge, S., Fossen, T.I., 1997. Robust Control Allocation of Overactuated Ship: Experiments with a Model Ship. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 30(22), 193-198.
13 Craven, P.J., Sutton, R., Burns, R.S., 1998. Control Strategies for Unmanned Underwater Vehicles. The Journal of Navigation, 51(1), 79-105.   DOI
14 Fossen, T.I., Johansen, T.A., 2006. A Survey of Control Allocation Methods for Ships and Underwater Vehicles. In 14th Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation.