Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5574/KSOE.2014.28.3.218

Design Optimization and Reliability Analysis of Jacket Support Structure for 5-MW Offshore Wind Turbine  

Lee, Ji-Hyun (Samwon Millennia Inc.)
Kim, Soo-Young (Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Pusan National University)
Kim, Myung-Hyun (Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Pusan National University)
Shin, Sung-Chul (Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Pusan National University)
Lee, Yeon-Seung (Division of Ocean Systems Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology)
Publication Information
Journal of Ocean Engineering and Technology / v.28, no.3, 2014 , pp. 218-226 More about this Journal
Abstract
Since the support structure of an offshore wind turbine has to withstand severe environmental loads such as wind, wave, and seismic loads during its entire service life, the need for a robust and reliable design increases, along with the need for a cost effective design. In addition, a robust and reliable support structure contributes to the high availability of a wind turbine and low maintenance costs. From this point of view, this paper presents a design process that includes design optimization and reliability analysis. First, the jacket structure of the NREL 5-MW offshore wind turbine is optimized to minimize the weight and stresses, while satisfying the design requirements. Second, the reliability of the optimum design is evaluated and compared with that of the initial design. Although the present study results in a new optimum shape for a jacket support structure with reduced weight and increased reliability, the authors suggest that the optimum design has to be accompanied by a reliability analysis during the design process, as well as reliability based design optimization if needed.
Keywords
Offshore wind turbine; Jacket support structure; Sensitivity analysis; Optimum design; Reliability analysis;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Saleem, Z., 2011. Alternatives and Modifications of Monopile Foundation or Its Installation Technique for Noise Mitigation. TUDelft Report, TUDelft University.
2 Youn, B.D., Xi, Z., Wang, P., 2008. Eigenvector Dimension Reduction (EDR) Method for Sensitivity-Free Probability Analysis. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 37(1), 13-28.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Lee, J.H., Kim S.Y., 2014. Design Sensitivity and Optimum Design of Monopile Support Structure in Offshore Wind Turbine, Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea, 51(1), 78-87.   DOI
4 IEC-61400-3, 2009. Wind Turbines-Part 3: Design Requirements for Offshore Wind Turbines. Edition 1.0, International Electrotechnical Commission.
5 Jonkman, J., Butterfield, S., Musial, W., Scott, G., 2009. Definition of a 5-MW Reference Wind Turbine for Offshore System Development. NREL/TP-500-38060, NREL: Golden CO.
6 Jonkman, J, Musial, W., 2010. Offshore Code Comparison Collaboration (OC3) for IEA Task 23 Offshore Wind Technology and Deployment. Contract 2010;303:275-3000.
7 Kim, J.Y., Oh, K.Y., Kang, K.S., Lee, J.S., 2013. Site Selection of Offshore Wind Farms around the Korean Peninsula through Economic Evaluation. Renewable Energy, 54, 189-195.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Krishnakumar, K., 1989. Micro-Genetic Algorithms for Stationary and Non-Stationary Function Optimization. Proceedings of Intelligent Control and Adaptive Systems, 1196, 289.
9 Lee, D.Y., Kim, J.H., Lee, Y.S., Lee, J.H., 2012. Sensitivity Analysis and Optimization of Monopile Transition Piece in 5 MW Offshore Wind Turbines. Proceedings of the KWEA Spring Conference, KWEA, 2012.
10 Musial, W., Butterfield, S., Ram, B., 2006. Energy from Offshore Wind. the Offshore Technology Conference, 1888-1898.
11 PIAnO (Process Integration, Automation and Optimization), 2012. User's Manual. PIDOTECH Inc.
12 Garrad Hassan GL., 2010. Bladed Ttheory Manual Version 4.1, Garrad Hassan & Partners Ltd.
13 de Vries, W., Vemula, N.K., Passon, P., Fischer, T., Kaufer, D., Matha, D., Vorpahl, F., 2011. Final Report WP4. 2: Support Structure Concepts for Deep Water Sites. Tech. Report, Project UpWind.
14 Han, K.M., Kang, S.H., Lee, J.C., Lee, J.H., Kang, D.H., Shin, S.C., Kim, S.Y., 2011. Optimum Design of Substructure in Floating Wind Turbine. Proceedings of the Annual Autumn Meeting, SNAK, Mokpo, 3-4 November, 2011.
15 Americal Instutute of Steel Consturction(AISC), 1989. Specification for Structural Steel Builidngs, Allowable Stress Design and Plastic Design.
16 American Petroleum Institute(API), 1993. Recommended Practice for Planning, Designing and Constructing Fixed Offshore Platforms-Working Stress Design. API Recommended Practice 2A-WSD (RP 2A-WSD).
17 Det Norske Veritas (DNV), 1992. Structural Reliability Analysis of Marine Structures, Classification Notes No.30.6.
18 Det Norske Veritas (DNV), 1996. Joint Industry Project, Guideline for Offshore Structural Reliability Analysis: Examples for Jacket Platforms, Report No. 95-3204.
19 Bentley Systems, 2011. SACS Users Manual 5.3, Bentley Systems Incorporated.
20 Sailby, E., 1990. Descriptive Sampling: A Better Approach to Monte Carlo Simulation. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 41(12), 1133-1142.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Hess, P.E., Bruchman, D., Assakkaf, I.A., Ayyub, B.M., 2002. Uncertainties in Material and Geometric Strength and Load Variables. Naval engineers journal, 114(2), 139-166.   DOI