1 |
Tanaka Y (2015) Reflections on the advisory opinion of ITLOS as a full court: the ITLOS advisory opinion of 2015. Law Practice Int Court Trib 14:318-339
DOI
|
2 |
Wolfrum R (2012) Panel II: advisory opinions: are they a suitable alternative for the settlement of international disputes? In: Wolfrum R, Gatzschmann I (eds) International dispute settlement: room for innovations. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 33-123
|
3 |
You K-J (2008) Advisory opinions of the international tribunal for the law of the sea: article 138 of the rules of the tribunal revisited. Ocean Dev Int Law 39(4):360-371
DOI
|
4 |
Burke C (2017) Article 191. In: Prowless A (ed) Unted nations convention on the law of the sea. C.H.Beck, Munchen, 97 p
|
5 |
d'Argent P (2019) Article 65. In: Zimmermann A, Tams C-J (eds) The statute of the international court of justice: a commentary. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1795 p
|
6 |
ICJ (1975) Western Sahara, advisory opinion. International Court of Justice, 12 p
|
7 |
ICJ (1996) Legality of the threat or use of nuclear weapons, advisory opinion. International Court of Justice, 234 p
|
8 |
ICJ (2004) Legal consequences of the construction of a wall in the occupied palestinian territory, advisory opinion. International Court of Justice, p 148
|
9 |
ITLOS (2011) Responsibilities and obligations of States with respect to activities in the area, advisory opinion. 1 Feb 2011. International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea. https://www.itlos.org/fileadmin/itlos/documents/cases/case_no_17/17_adv_op_010211_en.pdf Accessed 1 May 2022
|
10 |
ICJ (2010) Accordance with international law of the unilateral declaration of independence in respect of Kosovo, advisory opinion. International Court of Justice. https://www.icj-cij.org/en/case/141 Accessed 1 May 2022
|
11 |
ITLOS (2013a) Request for advisory opinion submitted by the sub-regional fisheries commission, advisory opinion. 28 Nov 2013. International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea. https://www.itlos.org/fileadmin/itlos/documents/cases/case_no.21/written_statements_round1/C21_Response_Round_1_Australia.pdf Accessed 1 May 2022
|
12 |
ITLOS (2013b) Request for advisory opinion submitted by the sub-regional fisheries commission, advisory opinion. 28 November 2013. https://www.itlos.org/fileadmin/itlos/documents/cases/case_no.21/written_statements_round1/C21_Response_Round_1_Ireland.pdf Accessed 1 May 2022
|
13 |
ITLOS (2013c) Request for advisory opinion submitted by the sub-regional fisheries commission, advisory opinion. 18 November 2013. https://www.itlos.org/fileadmin/itlos/documents/cases/case_no.21/written_statements_round1/C21_Response_Round_1_Germany.pdf Accessed 1 May 2022
|
14 |
ITLOS (2013d) Request for advisory opinion submitted by the sub-regional fisheries commission, advisory opinion. https://www.itlos.org/fileadmin/itlos/documents/cases/case_no.21/written_statements_round1/C21_Response_Round_1_China.pdf Accessed 1 May 2022
|
15 |
Kim D-Y (2010b) Advisory proceedings before the international tribunal for the law of the sea as an alternative procedure to supplement the dispute-settlement mechanism under part XV of the United Nations convention on the law of the sea. Issues in Legal Scholarship 7(1):8-9
|
16 |
ITLOS (2013e) Request for advisory opinion submitted by the sub-regional fisheries commission, advisory opinion. https://www.itlos.org/fileadmin/itlos/documents/cases/case_no.21/written_statements_round1/C21_Response_Round_1_UK.pdf Accessed 1 May 2022
|
17 |
ITLOS (2015a) Declaration of judge cot, request for advisory opinion submitted by the sub-regional fisheries commission, advisory opinion. International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea. https://www.itlos.org/fileadmin/itlos/documents/cases/case_no.21/advisory_opinion_published/2015_21_Decl_Cot-E.pdf Accessed 1 May 2022
|
18 |
Jesus J-L (2006) Article 138, In: Rao P-C, Gautier P (eds) The rules of the international tribunal for the law of the sea: a commentary. Martinus Nijhoff Publisher, Leiden, 394 p
|
19 |
ITLOS (2015b) Request for advisory opinion submitted by the sub-regional fisheries commission, advisory opinion. 2 Apr 2015. International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea. https://www.itlos.org/fileadmin/itlos/documents/cases/case_no.21/advisory_opinion_published/2015_21-advopE.pdf Accessed 1 May 2022
|
20 |
Kim D-Y (2010a) Advisory proceedings before the international tribunal for the law of the sea as an alternative procedure to supplement the dispute-settlement mechanism under part XV of the United Nations convention on the law of the sea. Issue Legal Scholar 7(1):4
|
21 |
ICJ (1989) Applicability of article VI, section 22, of the convention on the privileges and immunities of the United Nations, advisory opinion. International Court of Justice, 191 p
|
22 |
Rao P-C, Gautier P (2006) The rules of the international tribunal for the law of the sea: a commentary. Martinus Nijhoff Publisher, Leiden, 393 p
|
23 |
Kolb R (2013) The international court of justice. Hart Publishing, Oxford, 1362 p
|
24 |
Ndiaye T-M (2010) The advisory function of the international tribunal for the law of the sea. Chin J Int Law 9(1):565-587
DOI
|
25 |
Oller-Frahm K (2012) Article 96. In: Simma B, Khan D-E, Nolte G, Paulus A, Wessendorf N (eds) The charter of the United Nations: a commentary. Volume II. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1985-1986
|
26 |
Serdy A (2017a) Article 297. In Prowless A (ed) United Nations convention on the law of the sea, C.H.Beck, Munchen, 132 p
|
27 |
Serdy A (2017b) Article 298. In Prowless A (ed) Unted Nations convention on the law of the sea, C.H.Beck, Munchen, 134 p
|